The Forge Archives

General Forge Forums => Site Discussion => Topic started by: Ron Edwards on September 04, 2002, 02:22:10 PM

Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Ron Edwards on September 04, 2002, 02:22:10 PM
Yup, Clinton and I have the same birthday - today. I'm 38.

Makes you just look up at the starry sky and say, "H'm," doesn't it? At least it would if I were still living in California.

Best,
Ron
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Balbinus on September 04, 2002, 02:36:36 PM
Well happy birthday to you both.

Have a great day, hope you're both still gaming in another 38 years.
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Clinton R. Nixon on September 04, 2002, 03:04:25 PM
And I'm 26. (And incidentally, my girlfriend's mother's birthday is today, too. Synchroncity is odd.)
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Ferry Bazelmans on September 04, 2002, 03:39:18 PM
Congrats! :)
Title: Another Thing You Beat Me to, Ron
Post by: Le Joueur on September 04, 2002, 03:46:57 PM
Congratulations!

Fang Langford

p. s. Who turns thirty-seven in October.  Hey!  That means Ron is a 'boomer and I still retain my title as 'The Elder Statesman of Generation X'  (which I keep on the wall right below my framed 'notice of promotion' to Executive Regional Director of the Devil's Advocacy Department at Large, for the Midwest).
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: GreatWolf on September 04, 2002, 03:48:50 PM
Congratulations, guys!

Seth Ben-Ezra
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: xiombarg on September 04, 2002, 03:57:54 PM
Happy birthday, guys. Consider my recent purchases of Paladin, Donjon, and Trollbabe to be your birthday presents. ;-)
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Seth L. Blumberg on September 04, 2002, 04:16:32 PM
Happy birthday.

Damn, Clinton, you're only 26? Make me feel old, why don't you.
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Jared A. Sorensen on September 04, 2002, 04:44:27 PM
Both born today? What are the odds?

Quick, get Ken Hite to run a numeroligical study...

- J
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: C. Edwards on September 04, 2002, 05:05:00 PM
Happy Birthdays!
Title: Re: Another Thing You Beat Me to, Ron
Post by: Gordon C. Landis on September 04, 2002, 07:49:12 PM
Quote from: Le JoueurCongratulations!

Fang Langford

p. s. Who turns thirty-seven in October.  Hey!  That means Ron is a 'boomer and I still retain my title as 'The Elder Statesman of Generation X'  (which I keep on the wall right below my framed 'notice of promotion' to Executive Regional Director of the Devil's Advocacy Department at Large, for the Midwest).

Hey, congrats from me as well - enjoy your birthdays!

Now I get to prove what a geek I am by lecturing Fang about generational labels . . . wait, I can provide quotes and links to do it for me!  Here we go:

"Douglas Coupland's [sic] 1991 bestseller Generation X:  Tales For An Accelerated Culture was dedicated to 'the generation born in the late 1950s and 1960s'"

That one's taken from this link (http://www.babybusters.org/debunk.htm).

And this link (http://www.uta.fi/FAST/US7/REF/genguide.html) has some good info too.

As I turn 39 in December, I'm afraid that "Elder Statesman of Generation X" title is reassigned.  I've no delusions I'll get to keep it, though - I'm sure there's a 40-41 year old lurking about here someplace to snatch it from me, using the 1961 + definition.  And if we start allowing Mr. Copeland's vague "late 50's" into the equation, all bets are off . . .

Gordon
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Paul Czege on September 04, 2002, 08:36:49 PM
Hey Gordon,

...was dedicated to 'the generation born in the late 1950s and 1960s'

Typically the Baby Boom generation is associated with the years between 1946 and 1964. The birth rate spiked after the end of WWII. Are you sure Coupland wasn't dedicating his book about Generation X to the prior generation?

Paul
Title: Those Are the Numbers I was Given
Post by: Le Joueur on September 04, 2002, 09:21:17 PM
Hey Gordon,

Quote from: Paul Czege
Quote from: Gordon C. Landis...was dedicated to 'the generation born in the late 1950s and 1960s'
Typically the Baby Boom generation is associated with the years between 1946 and 1964. The birth rate spiked after the end of WWII. Are you sure Coupland wasn't dedicating his book about Generation X to the prior generation?
Paul, as well as both articles you link, cite the 46-64 number that I have found most common.  Likewise, few people our ages seem inclined to include themselves in "generation X."  As a Field Director of the local Devil's Advocacy Department, you have to understand it's my job to stretch labels right up to their breaking point.  Here, I feel I'm on pretty solid ground, virtually every American commercial press reference uses the 46-64 range for the 'boomers; I'm of 1965 making me clearly in 'that generation.'

Besides, why so much effort to defeat what was no more than a (questionably) witty afterward?

Fang Langford
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Ron Edwards on September 04, 2002, 09:55:03 PM
Hey! Dame Logic is stopping her ears with horror. This is a "happy birthday" thread, not a debate about Gens and Xes.

Oh yeah, if you feel like giving a present, then donate a buck or two to the Forge.

Best,
Ron
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Adam on September 04, 2002, 10:30:25 PM
Happy Birthday, gentlemen.... I mean, Ron and Clinton... ;-)
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: wyrdlyng on September 04, 2002, 11:00:14 PM
Happy Freakin Birthday(s)!

Umm, that's all I have.
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Gordon C. Landis on September 05, 2002, 01:03:04 AM
Quote from: Ron EdwardsHey! Dame Logic is stopping her ears with horror. This is a "happy birthday" thread, not a debate about Gens and Xes.

Oh yeah, if you feel like giving a present, then donate a buck or two to the Forge.

Great Galloping Ghost, he's right!  About . . . everything!  Well, *these* things, anyway :-)   But I'll let the everything comment stand since it's his birthday.  Not that a "debate" was ever what I intended - questionably witty is apparently a widely applicable label.

Paul & Fang, PM me if you really care about Gen Boom/Bust/X/Y/2000 stuff, and Clinton, since it's also your birthday, you're right about everything too.  As is your mom.  If you were still a teenager, that would no doubt create some interesting paradoxes!

Gordon
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: greyorm on September 05, 2002, 02:36:59 AM
Happy Birthday, you two!

I'd teasingly call you a couple of old farts, but as I just celebrated my 26th last week, and I have more kids than Ron and Clinton combined (any number is bigger than zero!), I think it might be hypocritical! ;D
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Fabrice G. on September 05, 2002, 12:07:06 PM
Hello oldies !!!

...well technically Clinton you're younger than me...but I welcome you in the "past the quarter of a century" very non-private club.

Fabrice.
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Blake Hutchins on September 05, 2002, 05:56:57 PM
Hell, I'm older than both of you.  Happy belated birthday, y'all.

Best,

Blake
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: greyorm on September 06, 2002, 05:48:46 AM
Quote from: Blake HutchinsHell, I'm older than both of you.

Combined?  ;D

-Rev. Raven
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Eric J. on September 06, 2002, 07:59:53 AM
You know... I'd donate a dollar, if I had one... Actaully, my birthday is on 9/11, so for a present, donate to one of thoes charities.  I know you would anyway.
Title: Personal note: Clinton & me are older
Post by: Jason L Blair on September 06, 2002, 02:11:19 PM
Happy belated birthday to yas.

Incidentally, I was actually in Chicago on Ron's birthday on my flight layover. And again on the day after during another flight layover.