The Forge Archives

Yesterday I posted my first draft of my combat rules and so far I have received no feedback; which is I suppose feedback in and of itself.

I though rather then bump that thread I would try to explain my goals in designing a new system and hopefully that will be more interesting to people and maybe even get someone interested enough to critique the rules.

What I am trying to do is create a system that better simulates not real combat but the type of fights you see in anime like Ghost in the Shell, Hong Kong action movies, and the Matrix.

To better model those fights I've largely done away with the idea of passive defense.  So characters have no armor class or defensive value that attacks must exceed in order to hit.

Instead the system is built around having a large pool of active defenses options and follow-ups to attacks called, respectively, Defensive and Offensive counters.

So every time someone attacks you you have the option to do something.

It could be something as simple as trying to avoid the attack:
Side Step
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Dodge [Dex].  Each success removes one success from the triggering attack roll.  Using Side Step against a firearm imposes a 2 dice penalty of your roll.

or a dodge/move:
Back Flip
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter, Persistent
Effect: Roll Dodge [Dex].  For each success rolled you may move 1 square away from the triggering attacker in a straight line.  For each inch moved remove one success from the triggering attack roll.  Until the beginning of your next turn all other attacks against you suffer a 2 dice penalty to hit.

a dodge/counter attack:
Riposte
Melee Defensive Counter
Effect: Parry the triggering attack.  After the attack is fully resolved Strike the triggering target.
            Special: If the triggering attack did damage to you you suffer a 1 die accuracy penalty to the
                          Strike for each level of damage you took.

or something even more interesting:
Face Off
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter,  Interrupt
Effect: Roll Firearms [Per].  Remove 1 level of damage from the triggering attack  for each success rolled. Before he is allowed to use an Offensive Counter Aim at the triggering target and Ready a Head Shot.  Make a contested Dex roll with the triggering target.  If you lose he may immediately Ready an attack against you.
            Special: You may only use Stand Off once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
                          of the weapon used.

The idea being instead of taking your turn and standing around while other people take theirs every time someone interacts with you you interact with them.

On your turn you can also follow up basic attacks with Offensive Counters, which can do many thing.

Allow you to move:
Shift
Melee/Ranged Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Move up to 2 inches.

Set yourself up for a stronger attack:
Opening
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: You gain a 2 dice bonus to accuracy and a 1 dice bonus to damage on your next melee attack made against the triggering target.

Add some effect to the attack you just made:
Nerve Strike
Melee Offensive Counter
Effect: If the triggering attack hit make an Martial Arts[Dex] roll opposed by a Constitution or Willpower roll.  If you score more successes then your target he is Stunned.

or make another attack:
Hail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter
Effect: Recover 1 Offensive Counter and make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.
            Special: You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
                          of the weapon used.

The limiting factor to counters is that while you have a lot of them each time you use one it is gone for the encounter.  However you can also get some of them back during a fight; if they have the Recoverable keyword.

This is to encourage players to use something other then their most powerful moves over and over.

For example here are three basic Brawl attacks:
Punch: Accuracy: +2 , Damage: 3 [Str]
Jab: Accuracy: +2, Damage: 1 [Str]
        Special: Recover 1 Defensive Counter 
Kick: Accuracy: +0, Damage: 5 [Str]

Punch and Kick are your basic trading accuracy for damage attacks.  Jab however is worse then Punch in every way except it allows the player to recover a defensive counter.  So hopefully the decision of when to punch/kick and when to use something like jab adds another layer of strategy to the combat.

Anyways that is what I'm going for/working on.  Any and all feedback is appreciated and thanks for your time!

The mechanics thread can be found here:
http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=29597.0 (http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=29597.0)

And basic setting info here:
http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=29551.0 (http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=29551.0)

I like the idea of anime combat, and I also like your game setting (God disappearing is interesting, and a little similar to my Melkrin setting).

How much "colorful narration" would there be involved in these fights?  The actual description, or in the case of manga and animation- the visuals, of anime battles are what makes me really interested in them.  Is the onus to narrate interesting gun play/sword play and insane situations more on the player or the DM? 

I can kind of picture this as a card game, where someone is saying "My feet leave the ground as I levitate up into the air and rain down a HAIL OF LEAD on the angel, then I narrowly SHIFT my position to avoid his return fire!"  Is this sort of how it works?  Are these maneuvers on cards, or do you just call them out as keywords to aid the dice?

I'd really be interested in seeing an example of combat from a narrative standpoint.  Like, what the players saying/doing at the table when combat goes off.

Quote from: FetusCommander on April 02, 2010, 05:45:26 PM
I like the idea of anime combat, and I also like your game setting (God disappearing is interesting, and a little similar to my Melkrin setting).

How much "colorful narration" would there be involved in these fights?  The actual description, or in the case of manga and animation- the visuals, of anime battles are what makes me really interested in them.  Is the onus to narrate interesting gun play/sword play and insane situations more on the player or the DM? 

I can kind of picture this as a card game, where someone is saying "My feet leave the ground as I levitate up into the air and rain down a HAIL OF LEAD on the angel, then I narrowly SHIFT my position to avoid his return fire!"  Is this sort of how it works?  Are these maneuvers on cards, or do you just call them out as keywords to aid the dice?

I'd really be interested in seeing an example of combat from a narrative standpoint.  Like, what the players saying/doing at the table when combat goes off.

Thanks!

To answer your question I am shamelessly stealing the idea of Stunting from White-Wolfs Exalted game.  So whenever yo take an action you would get a 1 or 2 dice bonus to it if you describe it in a cool or interesting way.

A chard game is a very good analogy,and your almost exactly right.

If someone said "I counter with Hail of Lead" they would get to make all the checks as written with no bonus or penalty.

If they use Hail of Lead said something like "I whip around firing as I go" they would get a 1 die bonus to the attack roll.

If they use Hail of Lead and really get into it "as the Angle ducks to the right and begins to take flight to avoid my last shot I leap up against the wall and fire off a burst as I flip over him" they would get a two dice bonus.

In all cases they use Hail of Lead but the more they add to the game the more they get out.  They also have the ability to make minor additions alterations to the powers based on stunting.  It's would be perfectly fine to describe Haymaker as a powerful Axe Kick for example.

I would recommend you check out the Wushu RPG. It is very similar to what you have going on--a wire-fighting combat system that gives bonuses for detailed narration.

Quote from: SAW on April 02, 2010, 09:46:55 PM
I would recommend you check out the Wushu RPG. It is very similar to what you have going on--a wire-fighting combat system that gives bonuses for detailed narration.

Thanks for the tip.  I'll look it up!

Mobius,

Your system appears easy to understand, fast-paced, and vivid.  Can you present us with a combat example so that we can get a feel of the narrative and mechanical aesthetics?

Quote from: Ar Kayon on April 04, 2010, 11:05:09 PM
Mobius,

Your system appears easy to understand, fast-paced, and vivid.  Can you present us with a combat example so that we can get a feel of the narrative and mechanical aesthetics?

I'd be happy to.

David Tiberian an H-sec* agent is walking down a dark alley one rainy night when the GM asks his player to make an Awareness or Perception roll.  Knowing that cannot be good the player thinks for a second and comes up with the following stunt.

"Something does not feel quite right so I stop wait for a flash of lightning to drive back the shadows."  The GM decides that is worth one die so David's player rolls 6 dice (5 for hisAwareness plus one for the stunt) with a difficulty of 6 (10 - 4, his Perception).  He gets three successes so the GM tells him that as he blinks away the white afterimages from the lightning  sees the shadows of three men darting out of a small side alley about 15 meters ahead.  David pulls his gun, and auto-pistol, and holds it to his side concealing it in the folds of his trench coat.

David Tiberian:
Strength: 3 [7]
Constitution: 4 [6]
Dexterity: 5 [5]
Perception: 4 [6]
Intelligence: 3 [7]
Willpower: 4 [6]
Presence: 2 [8]
(Target numbers set by the attribute are in [])

Relevant Skills (Attribute 1/Attribute 2)
Firearms: 6 (Dex/Per)
Dodge: 5 (Dex/-)
Martial Arts: 4 (Dex/Str)
Awareness: 5 (Per/-)
Computer, Wired: 5 (Int/-)
Persuasion 4 (Pre/-)

Relevant Gear
Auto Pistol:  Accuracy: +1, Damage: 6L(Per), Range: 5/15/30/50
                      Recoil: 3, Standard Clip:12 rounds
Heavy Armor Weave:  12-1[0]
Trench coat with a full, if wrinkled, suit.
High End Cyber-modem: With advanced Data Wards, multitasking, and surveillance/anti-surveillance programs.

Counters:
I'm not going to list them all but David would have 29 Defensive Counters (11 from Firearms, 10 from Dodge, and 8 from Martial Arts) and 15 Offensive Counters (6 from Firearms, 5 from Dodge, and 4 from Martial Arts).

Health Levels:
Non-Lethal: 4 -> 4 (1 die wound penalty, Stun Roll) -> 4 (2 dice wound penalty, K.O. Roll)
Lethal: 4 (1 die wound penalty, Stun Roll)  -> 4 (2 dice wound penalty, Stun Roll) -> 4 (3 dice wound penalty, K.O. Roll) -> [Overflow]

He also makes a quick mental list of people who might want him dead and writes it to a text file through his cyber-modem and then sets it to record what he sees and hears in the next few minutes.  If his heart stops it will automatically forward the files to command as well as a few friends he's made along the way.

Thinking for a second he decides to do a sweep of the local Wired paying particular attention to any time-stamp anomalies that could indicate a hacker about.  The GM decides that too is a 1 die stunt so he rolls 9 dice (5 for his computer skill, 1 for the stunt, and 3 more for his surveillance package) against a difficulty of 7 (set by his intelligence).  He rolls 5 successes and the GM informs him that he sees nothing out of the ordinary although there is a camera in the alley ahead he could  try hacking into to get a better view.

Never much for computer's Davids player decides take a quick look around for cover instead and the GM informs him that there is a large rusty metal dumpster about 3 meters ahead.

David makes a break for it as his three assailants step out of the shadows and the GM calls for initiative rolls.

The Attackers: Local muscle 2 are normals (not credible threats on their own and do not use abbreviated stats) and one killer for higher.   

Normals/Thugs:
Strength: 4 [6]
Constitution: 4 [6]
Dexterity: 3 [7]
Perception: 3 [7]
Intelligence: 3 [7]
Willpower: 3 [7]
Presence: 3 [7]

Relevant Skills (Attribute 1/Attribute 2)
Brawl: 3 (Dex/Str)
Firearms: 3 (Dex/Per)
Dodge: 3 (Dex/-)

Relevant Gear
Auto Pistol:  Accuracy: +1, Damage: 6L(Per), Range: 5/15/30/50
                      Recoil: 3, Standard Clip:12 rounds
Medium Armor Weave:  10-1[0]
Leather Jacket with jeans and t-shirt.

Counters: To keep the GM's paperwork manageable normals to not have a full set of counters.  Instead they have 1 or 2 Defensive Counters they can use without limit and rarely an Offensive Counter.

Block
Melee Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Brawl [Str].  Each success reduces the damage done by the triggering attack one level.  Blocking a non-lethal melee weapon imposes a 1 die penalty.  Blocking a lethal weapon takes a 2 dice penalty.

Street Tough
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter, Persistent, Recoverable
Effect: Convert the damage of the triggering attack from lethal to non-lethal.  Until the beginning of your next round all non-lethal attacks, including the triggering attack, do one less level of damage.

Health Levels: Normals have fewer health levels then full characters.
Non-lethal: 4 (1 die penalty, Stun Check)
Lethal: 4 (1 die penalty, K.O. Check) -> 4 (Auto K.O.) -> [Overflow]

The Killer:
Strength: 4 [6]
Constitution: 3 [7]
Dexterity: 4 [6]
Perception: 4 [6]
Intelligence: 3 [7]
Willpower: 3 [7]
Presence: 4 [6]

Relevant Skills (Attribute 1/Attribute 2)
Brawl: 4 (Dex/Str)
Firearms: 4 (Dex/Per)
Dodge: 4 (Dex/-)

Relevant Gear
Sub-machine Gun: Accuracy: +1, Damage: 6L(Per), Range: 10/25/45/70
                                  Recoil: 3, Standard Clip: 36 rounds
Medium Armor Weave:  10-1[0]
Full Suit and Jacket.

Counters:
Again I am not going to list them all but he'd have 24 Defensive Counters and 12 Offensive Counters.

Health Levels:
Non-Lethal: 3 -> 3 (1 die wound penalty, Stun Roll) -> 3 (2 dice wound penalty, K.O. Roll)
Lethal: 3 (1 die wound penalty, Stun Roll)  -> 3 (2 dice wound penalty, Stun Roll) -> 3 (3 dice wound penalty, K.O. Roll) -> [Overflow]

Next: The Fight!

*H-sec is a paramilitary/law enforcement branch of the Federal Government formed in 3 A.B. out of fear of possible incursions by Hell into our world.  Since then their mandate has expanded to include Angelic, Nephilim, and sometimes Soul-Hacker related crimes as well.

Round 1

Initiative is a d10 + Dex + Highest Combat Skill.

So David rolls a d10 + 11 and gets a 17.
The thugs roll a d10 + 6 and get 11.
The Hired Killer rolls a d10 + 8 and gets a 16.

David goes first and decides to Dodge while he makes a break for cover.  His player describes the following stunt "Anticipating the crack of gunfire around me I do a diving roll for the end of the trash bin and come up in a thigh crouch, weapon ready."  The GM decides that is worth 2 dice so David's Player rolls 7 dice (5 from the Dodge skill + 2 for the stunt) against a target number of 5 and rolls poorly only getting gets 3 successes.  Until the beginning of David's next turn all attacks against him take a 3 dice penalty and had he used any he could recover 1 Defensive Counter.

Dodge: Recover 1 Defensive Counter and roll Dodge [Dex] after an attack has been declared but before the roll to hit.  Each success imposes a 1 die penalty to all attack rolls made against you until the beginning of your next turn.
             Special: To use dodge you must have a held action or give up your next available action.  You
                           may use Defensive Counters normally while dodging.

The Hired Killers goes next but the GM decides to have him delay so he can see what he's up against.  So the 2 thugs rush forward covering 5 meters and open fire each with a burst from their auto pistols.  The GM describes "the shots cracking past David as he dives Pop, Pop, Pop, and the ping against the dumpster as David rolls behind it."  The GM gives himself a 2 dice for the stunt.

Burst Fire: Shoot the target with a +1 dice bonus to accuracy and damage.  This attack takes 3 rounds.
                    Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used.

Their attack rolls are:
3 (Skill) + 1 (The weapons accuracy) + 2 (stunt) + 1 (Burst Fire) - 3 (David's Dodge) - 1 (range) - 2 (effective cover) = 1 die with a difficulty of 7 (set by their Dexterity).

Both roll with one failing and the other rolling a 10 and getting two successes.  So the first attack misses and the second will hit unless David uses a Defensive Counter.  David's player decides to use Weave and describes himself "ducking back behind the dumpster just as one of the bullets hits where my head was a second before."  There is no roll to Weave so he does not get a stunt bonus but it two successes from the attack roll are negated and all further ranged attacks suffer an additional 1 die penalty until the beginning of David's next turn.

Weave
Ranged Defensive Counter, Persistent, Recoverable
Effect: Remove 2 success from the triggering attack roll.  Until the beginning of your next turn all ranged attacks suffer a 1 dice penalty to hit you.

The Hired Killer now goes and advances behind his help laying down a long burst from his Sub-machine Gun.  The GM stunts saying "David's pinned by the earlier shoots and he takes the opportunity to open up with a long burst that cuts lights up the alley."  The GM decides that worth 1 die and rolls to hit.

His attack roll is:
4 (skill) + 1 (accuracy) + 1 (stunt) + 2 (long burst) -  3 (David's Dodge) - 1 (Weave) - 2 (effective cover) = 2 dice vs a target number of 6 (again set by Dex).

The GM rolls and gets one success.

David's player is tired of taking fire so he declares he is going to use Hand-Eye Coordination.  "I figure he's going to try something like that so I wait for him to get line of sight on me then I hit the asphalt landing in a dirty mud puddle and line up a quick shot at him".  The GM gives David's player 2 dice for the stunt.

Hand-Eye Coordination
Ranged Defensive Counter
Effect: Duck the triggering attack.  After that attack is fully resolved Shoot the triggering attacker with a 3 dice penalty to accuracy.

Duck removes damage from the triggering attack so the GM adds up the damage dice: 6 (base) + 1 (successes on the attack roll) + 2 (long burst) for a total of 9 dice.

This is less then the Penetration Resistance of David's armor (12) so the damage is converted to non-lethal.  The GM rolls 9 dice with a target number of 6 (set by the killer's perception) and gets 5 successes.

David's armor removes 1 leaving 4.  David now rolls for his defensive counter Duck. He rolls 8 dice (skill plus stunt) vs a target number of 6 and get 5 successes.  The attack grazes his armor weave trench coat but does not damage.

Duck
Ranged Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Firearms [Per].  Remove 1 level of damage from the triggering attack  for each success rolled.

Knowing that David is a good shoot the GM decides to have his Killer use an Offensive Counter, Snap Shot.  Because David's counter was not an interrupt this is resolved first.  "Before you can get off your shot he drops his aim and fires off a round at you."  Again he gives the killer 1 die for the stunt.

His attack roll is:
4 (skill) + 1 (accuracy) + 1 (stunt) - 3 (snap shot penalty) - 3 (David's Dodge) - 1 (Weave) - 2 (effective cover) = 0 dice, so the attack automatically misses.

David gets to resolve the attack granted by Hand-Eye Coordination now. 

His attack roll is:
6 (skill) + 1 (accuracy) +2 (stunt) -3 (Hand-Eye Coordination penalty) -1 (range) = 5 dice with a target number of 5.  David's player rolls and gets 4 successes.

The GM decides to have his Killer use Evasion "his eyes go wide and you see fear in them as he looks down the barrel of your gun.  He steps sideways and does a half spin as you fire."  The GM gives himself 2 dice so he rolls 6 dice with a target number of 6 and gets 3 successes.

Evasion
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter
Effect: Roll Dodge [Dex].  Each success removes 1 success from the triggering attack roll. If the attack hits each success also removes 1 die of damage.

David's shot barely hits doing 4 dice of damage. (6 +1 for the success - 3 for evasion).  This is less then Penetration Resistance of the Killer's armor (which is 10) so it becomes non-lethal. 

David's player rolls 4 dice with a difficulty of 6 (set by David's Perception) and gets 3 successes. 

The Killer's armor removes 1 of those so he takes 2 levels of non-lethal damage.  The GM makes that down but it is not enough to force a Stun Check.

Round 2

Again David goes first. 

He decides to Double Tap one of the thugs.  "I roll to my side and put two rounds into the nearest attackers chest."  The GM gives him 1 die for the stunt.

His attack roll is:
6 (skill) + 1 (accuracy) +1 (stunt) -1 (Double Tap penalty) -1 (range) = 6 dice with a target number of 5.  Double Tap allows David to make two attacks against the same target, the first gets 3 successes the second 5.

Double Tap: Make two attack rolls against your target as if you were Shooting, each with a 1 die penalty to accuracy.  Both attacks are resolved simultaneously. Any bonuses to damage or accuracy only applies to one attack and your target's Defensive Counter applies to both attacks.  After your targets Defensive Counter is resolved you may only use one Offensive Counter which also takes a 1 die penalty to accuracy.
                     Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used.

The first shot does 9 dice of damage which is less then the thug' armor's penetration resistance so it becomes non-lethal.  David's player rolls against a target number of 6 and gets 5 successes.

The thugs armor removes 1 of those leaving 4.  The GM has him use Street Tough which takes off another level of damage leaving 3. 

The Thug must now make a Stun check which is a Willpower check. The GM rolls 2 dice (his Willpower with a 1 die penalty for the injury) vs a target number of 7 and gets 1 success, he passes and is not stunned by the first shot.

The second shot does 11 dice of damage which is more then the Thugs armor penetration so it stays lethal damage.   David's player rolls against a target number of 6 and gets 6 successes.

The thugs armor removes 1 of those leaving 5.  The GM again has him use Street Tough converting it to non-lethal and taking off another level of damage leaving 4.

This shot takes the last level of non-lethal damage the thug has so 3 stage up to lethal damage.  Now he must make a K.O. check which is again a Willpower Check.  The GM rolls 2 dice (his Willpower with a 1 die penalty for the injury.  Only the highest injury penalty applies) vs a target number of 7 and gets no successes.  The thug falls unconscious and is bleeding from a small hole in his chest but with medical attention will probably live.

David's player wants to end this fight quickly so he decides to take another shot at the killer using Hail of Lead.  Still prone on the ground he decides to keep it simple and stunts " I adjust my aim and fire a rapid burst at the guy with the sub-machine gun."  The GM gives him 1 die for the stunt.

His attack roll is:
6 (skill) + 1 (accuracy) +1 (stunt) +1 (Burst) -1 (range) = 8 dice with a target number of 5.  David's player rolls and gets 6 successes.

The only Offensive Counters David has used are not Recoverable so he cannot get any of them back this fight.

Hail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter
Effect: Recover 1 Offensive Counter and make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.
            Special: You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
                          of the weapon used.

Knowing that David has a lot more offensive counters and not wanting his guy to go down without a fight the GM has his killer use Defensive Roll.  "He continues the spin he made to avoid your last attack and rolls behind the other end of the dumpster out of your line of sight."  The GM decides this is a 1 die stunt.  David still gets to make the damage roll but he'll lose line of sight on the killer after that.

David's attack does 13 dice of damage (6 base + 6 successes +1 burst) against a target number of 6.  Again this is more then the killer's armor's penetration resistance so it is lethal.

David's player rolls and gets 7 successes, ouch!  The killer's armor removes 1 leaving 6 levels of lethal damage.  That forces him to make a stun roll at a 2 dice penalty.  The GM rolls 1 die (3 for his Willpower -2 for the wound) and fails, he is stunned and loses his next turn.

David's player decides to end his turn on a high note so it is the remaining thugs turn.

The GM has him close 5 of the remaining 8 meters with his free move and then has him Bull Rush David.  He describes the thugs "desperate charge to close the distance and keep David from firing again."  The GM gives himself 1 die for the stunt and rolls to hit.

Bull Rush: Accuracy: +0, Damage: 4[Str]
                   Special: Before making the attack you may move up to your speed in a straight line.  If
                                 Bull Rush hits you and the target make an opposed Str check, the loser is knocked                         
                                 prone.  You must move at least one inch in order to Bull Rush.  You may only Bull
                                 Rush once per turn.   

His attack roll is:
3 (skill) + 1 (stunt) +2 (David is prone against a melee attacker) = 6 dice vs a target number of 7 (set by his Dexterity).  The GM rolls and gets 3 successes.

The GM then rolls damage:
7 Dice with a target number of 6 (set by Strength), getting 4 successes.  Because this starts as non-lethal damage no armor check is needed.

Davis armor removes 1 of those successes leaving 3.

David cannot use a ranged counter against a melee attack so his player decides to Martial Block.  "I cross my arms and ex-hail before he lands to keep the wind from being knocked out of me."  The GM decides that is a nice detail and gives David 2 dice.

David rolls 7 dice (5 from his MA skill and 2 from the stunt) with a target number of 5 and gets 4 successes which is enough to negate the remaining damage.

Martial Block
Melee Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Martial Arts [Dex].  Each success reduces the damage done by the triggering attack one level.  Blocking a non-lethal melee weapon imposes a 1 die penalty.  Blocking a lethal weapon takes a 2 dice penalty.

Normally there would be an opposed Strength check as part of Bull Rush but the GM rules that because David was already prone the thug automatically drops prone too as he basically threw himself at David.

The Killer spends his turn recovering from stun.

Round 3

David Goes first and uses the Martial Arts maneuver Flip to get up without using his turn. "I shove the big oaf off of me and using one hand push myself backwards into a half roll before jumping up."  The GM awards him a 2 die stunt so he rolls 6 dice with a target number of 5 and gets 3 successes.  David gets up and will take a no penalty. 

Flip: Roll Martial Arts [Dex].  If you get at least one success you may stand up from prone and act this turn with a 2 dice penalty to any attack rolls you make until the beginning of your next turn.  For each additional success rolled this penalty is reduced by 1.

David goes after the thug with a Double-Kick "I kick him one in the face and then stomp on him."  The GM awards 1 die for the stunt and David gets to make 2 attacks.

Double-Kick: Make a Snap Kick attack against your target.  After that attack is fully resolved make a Side Kick attack against the same target.
                        Special: Until the start of your next turn all attack rolls against you gain a 2 dice bonus

Snap Kick: Accuracy: +1, Damage: 4 [Str]
Side Kick: Accuracy: +0, Damage: 6 [Str]

David rolls 6 dice for the first and 5 for the second each with a target number of 5 getting 3 successes on both of them.

The snap kick to the face does 7 dice of non-lethal damage and the side kick/stomp does 9.  Both are against a target number of 7 set by David's strength.  David rolls and gets 3 successes on the snap kick's damage roll and 5 on the side kick's.

The thugs armor reduces the damage of each attack by 1 level leaving 2 and 4 respectively.

The GM has him Block both attacks "He throws his arms over his face to stop your first viscous blow and then rolls to his right."  The GM decides that is a 1 die stunt and rolls 4 dice (3 from Brawl and 1 from the stunt) against a target number of 6.

He rolls 3 successes against the first attack leaving no damage and 2 vs the second so the thug takes 2 levels of non-lethal damage.  The thug rolls 2 dice for his stun check against a difficulty of 7 and makes it so he is not stunned.

Block
Melee Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Brawl [Str].  Each success reduces the damage done by the triggering attack one level.  Blocking a non-lethal melee weapon imposes a 1 die penalty.  Blocking a lethal weapon takes a 2 dice penalty.

Davis decides to use the Offensive Counter Cobra Strike so his next melee attack will gain a damage bonus against this guy.

Cobra Strike
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Your next successful melee attack against the triggering target gains a 3 dice bonus to damage.

The GM has the thug spend his turn getting to his feet.

Having recovered from being stunned the killer steps around the side of the dumpster and opens up with another Burst.  "Blood dripping from the side of his mouth and staining his jacket he curses at you as he fires."  The GM gives himself 1 die for the stunt.

Before the attack is rolled David decides to Dodge.  "I leap up and alternating between the dumpster and the alley wall jump above his line of fire."  The GM thinks that is cool and gives David 2 dice for the stunt.  David also recovers one of the Defensive Counters he used, Martial Block.

Dodge: Recover 1 Defensive Counter and roll Dodge [Dex] after an attack has been declared but before the roll to hit.  Each success imposes a 1 die penalty to all attack rolls made against you until the beginning of your next turn.
             Special: To use dodge you must have a held action or give up your next available action.  You
                           may use Defensive Counters normally while dodging.

David's player rolls 7 dice with a target number of 5 and gets 4 successes.

The Killer's attack roll is now:
4 (skill) + 1 (stunt) + 2 (long burst) - 4 (dodge) - 2 (wound penalty) = 1 die with a target number of 6.  The GM rolls and misses.

Even though the attack missed David decides to use Face Off which has the Interrupt counter so it is resolved before the killer has a chance to use an Offensive Counter.

Face Off
Melee/Ranged Defensive Counter,  Interrupt
Effect: Roll Firearms [Per].  Remove 1 level of damage from the triggering attack  for each success rolled. Before he is allowed to use an Offensive Counter Aim at the triggering target and Ready a Head Shot.  Make a contested Dex roll with the triggering target.  If you lose he may immediately Ready an attack against you.
            Special: You may only use Stand Off once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
                          of the weapon used.

Because the attack missed David does not have to roll to reduce the damage so he simply Aims and readies a Head Shot.

Head Shot: Shoot the target.  Each success on the attack roll increases the damage rolled by two dice instead of the usual one.
                    Special: You must be Aiming at your target and able to handle the recoil of the weapon
                                  used.  The target must have some identifiable vulnerable point to use this attack.

Davis and the Killer each roll Dexterity.  David rolls 5 dice with a target number of 5.  The killer rolls 2 dice (4 - 2 for his wound) against a target number of 6.  Not surprisingly David rolls more successes and the Killer is not able to ready an attack in response.

Instead of immediately taking the shoot David gives them a chance to surrender "Drop your weapons and I let you live.  Keep fighting and die."

The GM decides this is a Persuasion check.  He gives Davis 1 die for the stunt and a 2 dice bonus for the situation.  David rolls 7 dice against a target number of 8 getting 3 successes.

Both of his opponents roll their Willpower reduced by their respective wound penalties.  The killer rolls 1 dice vs a target number of 7 and fails so he drops his gun.  The thug rolls 2 dice also vs a target number of 7 and manages to get 3 successes.  The GM has him declare "I'll never go back to jail!".

Round 4
Unfortunately for him it is David's turn so "without taking my eyes or gun off of the man in front of me I backhand this idiot."

David's player stunts a punch as a backhand and gets a die for it.  The GM also decides he can maintain his readied action to shoot the Killer.

Punch: Accuracy: +2, Damage: 3[Str]

David rolls 7 dice with a target number of 5 and gets 5 successes.  Seeing that the fight is over the GM just has his last man Block without a stunt. 

David would normally roll 8 dice damage against a target number of 7 but Cobra Strike adds 3 more for a total of 11.  Rolling he gets 6 successes. 

The thug's armor removes one of those and the he rolls 2 dice with a target number of 6 to Block  and gets 2 successes.

David does 3  level of non-lethal damage to the thug who fails his K.O. check and the fight is over.

Turning to his prisoner David smiles behind the gun still pointed at his head "Lets talk".

After reading your description of a fight scenario, I have a few thought-out opinions of your system.  I'll start off with the things I like and why.


1.  I think your counters are well-devised and add not only descriptive flavor, but measurable tactical diversity to your system.

2.  I like how the narrative "cool-factor" encourages robust role-playing during an exchange without unbalancing it.

3.  Overall, the system combined with the setting looks fun and grasps the energy of Shadowrun (fantasy cyberpunk) without ripping it off.


The things I don't like are a combination of personal preference/bias (so feel free to ignore these) and mechanical critique (at least take those into consideration).


Preference:
1.  The amount of dice rolling in the above combat example is intimidating.  Even though dice pools are tempting because they offer a simple way to increase the complexity of any given system, in my opinion, they are cumbersome and inefficient.  I honestly believe you can pull off the same results for your system using a single d20 roll instead (using degree of success to model # of successes).  Or you can meet in the middle with the 3d6, which offers a sexy bell-curve.

2.  I think the "Bull-Rush" counter is too Dungeons and Dragons.  Perhaps renaming it to tackle or some actual fighting maneuver would effectively remove that association from anyone else's head.

3.  The "Street-Tough" counter seems cheap.  I think it should only subtract non-lethal damage, and instead maybe some superhuman ability (from being an angel or being a high-powered martial arts chi master or having implants) would subtract lethal damage.


Mechanical Critiques:
1.  There are a lot of different counters in your game.  This is not a problem in of itself.  However, it seems as if each one is its own special rule rather than a flourish of the core rules.  This will make the counters difficult to memorize and slow down combat by constant referencing.
Examples:

QuoteSpecial: You may only use Stand Off once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
of the weapon used.

Shouldn't a counter category already dictate how many times per turn this counter may be used?  Shouldn't the firearms section of combat already dictate that recoil-handling must precede all firearms techniques?

QuoteSpecial: You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
of the weapon used.

Do you see a pattern of redundancy here?

QuoteDouble Tap: Make two attack rolls against your target as if you were Shooting, each with a 1 die penalty to accuracy. Both attacks are resolved simultaneously. Any bonuses to damage or accuracy only applies to one attack and your target's Defensive Counter applies to both attacks. After your targets Defensive Counter is resolved you may only use one Offensive Counter which also takes a 1 die penalty to accuracy.
Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used.

The technique is cool, but is not described elegantly.  Keep refining your core rules so you can pare down all of your counters into easily-digestible formats.

QuoteBlock
Melee Defensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: Roll Brawl [Str]. Each success reduces the damage done by the triggering attack one level. Blocking a non-lethal melee weapon imposes a 1 die penalty. Blocking a lethal weapon takes a 2 dice penalty.

Perfect.  Clean and easy to memorize.

Instead of this:

QuoteHail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter
Effect: Recover 1 Offensive Counter and make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.
Special: You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
of the weapon used.

Try this:

Quote
Hail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter / recoverable
Effect: Make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.

The "recoverable" category makes it immediately apparent that you get back an offensive counter, and by making the recoil-handling to precede firearms techniques as a core rule, you can cut out that part of the special note.  "You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn" should already be covered in its appropriate counter category of rules.

2.  Conservation of combat time seems off.  What I mean is that in some parts of your combat example, it seems as if the two thugs are in suspended animation while the PC and Killer are going back and forth with their exchange.  I think it would be best to re-examine your counter rules and impose an absolute limit on how many you may use per round.  At some point, a combatant is going to get overwhelmed with so many things happening at once that an attack made against him is going to be unopposed.

Thank you for taking the time to read over all that and give feedback, I really appreciate it.

Some thoughts on what you said.

Quote1.  The amount of dice rolling in the above combat example is intimidating.  Even though dice pools are tempting because they offer a simple way to increase the complexity of any given system, in my opinion, they are cumbersome and inefficient.  I honestly believe you can pull off the same results for your system using a single d20 roll instead (using degree of success to model # of successes).  Or you can meet in the middle with the 3d6, which offers a sexy bell-curve.

An early attempt at building a system for this game used a d20 but I was not happy with the results and abandoned it.  While multiple dice are more complex they also allow me to model certain things in a much cleaner way then I was able to do under using a single die, especially some of the things I want to do with the supernatural systems.

Quote2.  I think the "Bull-Rush" counter is too Dungeons and Dragons.  Perhaps renaming it to tackle or some actual fighting maneuver would effectively remove that association from anyone else's head.

I can see that.  How does "Slam" strike you?

Quote3.  The "Street-Tough" counter seems cheap.  I think it should only subtract non-lethal damage, and instead maybe some superhuman ability (from being an angel or being a high-powered martial arts chi master or having implants) would subtract lethal damage.

Brawl, which Street-Tough comes from, is all about raw strength, giving and taking a beating.  If it helps there is a mechanic for converting non-lethal damage to lethal.  After everything is said and done if you take more levels of non-lethal damage then your Constitution it stages up to lethal damage.

I have a play test up in about two weeks so I'll be sure to get feedback on that one and see if they feel the same way.

QuoteShouldn't a counter category already dictate how many times per turn this counter may be used?  Shouldn't the firearms section of combat already dictate that recoil-handling must precede all firearms techniques?

Do you see a pattern of redundancy here?

Some firearms attacks you can make even though the recoil is to high, you just take a penalty.  However it may be they are the minority as should be the special case, I'll check on that.

Quote

QuoteDouble Tap: Make two attack rolls against your target as if you were Shooting, each with a 1 die penalty to accuracy. Both attacks are resolved simultaneously. Any bonuses to damage or accuracy only applies to one attack and your target's Defensive Counter applies to both attacks. After your targets Defensive Counter is resolved you may only use one Offensive Counter which also takes a 1 die penalty to accuracy.
Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used.

The technique is cool, but is not described elegantly.  Keep refining your core rules so you can pare down all of your counters into easily-digestible formats.

Agreed. This is very much a first draft.

QuoteInstead of this:

QuoteHail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter
Effect: Recover 1 Offensive Counter and make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.
Special: You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn and you must be able to handle the recoil
of the weapon used.

Try this:

QuoteHail of Lead
Ranged Offensive Counter / recoverable
Effect: Make an attack against any valid target using any basic Firearms attack you know.

The "recoverable" category makes it immediately apparent that you get back an offensive counter, and by making the recoil-handling to precede firearms techniques as a core rule, you can cut out that part of the special note.  "You may only use Hail of Lead once per turn" should already be covered in its appropriate counter category of rules.

That would not work because Hail of Lead is not recoverable (almost none of the extra attacks are).  Instead it allows you to recover one offensive counter that has the recoverable key word.

I may try and come up with a keyword system for that but I suspect it would end up being more complex then it is worth.  Only using a given extra attack once per turn was a late addition to the rules to deal with the issue you bring up next.  As you suggest I'll likely try and make a global rule about that.

Quote2.  Conservation of combat time seems off.  What I mean is that in some parts of your combat example, it seems as if the two thugs are in suspended animation while the PC and Killer are going back and forth with their exchange.  I think it would be best to re-examine your counter rules and impose an absolute limit on how many you may use per round.  At some point, a combatant is going to get overwhelmed with so many things happening at once that an attack made against him is going to be unopposed.

This is something I am going to be watching very closely in my play tests. I am not very concerned about the thugs standing around, as they exist mostly to eat up resources and make the players look cool.

The main characters and NPCs getting overwhelmed is a concern although that is why persistent counters exist and some a very potent.

Some examples:
Street Defense
Melee Defensive Counter, Persistent
Effect: Block the triggering attack.  Until the beginning of your next turn you may choose to Block any valid attack.  This counts as your Defensive Counter for the attack.

Spinning Dodge
Ranged Defensive Counter, Persistent
Effect: Duck the triggering attack and recover 1 Defensive Counter.  Until the end of your next turn all ranged attacks made against you suffer a 1 die penalty to their to hit roll for each success you rolled and all melee attacks suffer a 2 dice penalty.
            Special: On your next turn if you attack using Shoot you may maintain this counter until the end
                          of your following turn.

Also Dodge is a basic maneuver (in the Dodge skill, go figure) not a counter.  Early in the fight David combined Dodge with a persistent counter to make himself very hard to hit and relied on defensive counters that allowed him to attack for offense. I expect that will be a common tactic when people are outnumbered.

Again thank you for taking the time to post.  Typing up that example was very valuable and I'll look closely at some of the thing you suggested.

mobius,
  I got why some moves said "Must be able to handle recoil" and others did not.
  I was concerned about rolling for DMG, but I see why it is done.
  the one part that confused me was, it seems like David is able to do multiple attacks per turn without penalty. Particularly in Round 2, he does double-Tap and Hail of Lead. The rules aren't clear to me when you can or can't do multiple attacks like that.
  Other than that, it is a good system that has a real CCG feel without being bogged down by cards.

Quote from: dindenver on April 05, 2010, 03:15:03 PM
mobius,
  I got why some moves said "Must be able to handle recoil" and others did not.
  I was concerned about rolling for DMG, but I see why it is done.
  the one part that confused me was, it seems like David is able to do multiple attacks per turn without penalty. Particularly in Round 2, he does double-Tap and Hail of Lead. The rules aren't clear to me when you can or can't do multiple attacks like that.
  Other than that, it is a good system that has a real CCG feel without being bogged down by cards.

Hi Dave,

Thank you for taking the time to review my system.  I'm glad you like it.

To answer your question he's making one basic attack, Double-Tap, and then using an Offensive Counter.  Although looking back his Hail of Lead attack should have taken a 1 die penalty due to him using Double Tap before it.

At it's core the system plays like this:
Basic Attack --> Defensive Counter --> Offensive Counter

If the Offensive Counter is an extra attack then the target has the option of using another Defensive Counter and the attacker has the option of using another Offensive Counter. 

The cycle stops when either:
a) The attacker has no more valid Offensive Counters or target.
b) The attacker decides to stop.
c) The defender uses a Defensive Counter with the Interrupt keyword and the attacker (his target) uses a Defensive Counter.

While the chain can go on for a while, how long is something I am going to look at very closely in play tests, almost no Offensive Counters that include an attack are recoverable so they are a limited resource.

I hope that clears things up.  If not please let me know--its always easier to picture these things in my head then convey then in writing.

1.  What's the difference between a basic maneuver and a counter?  When can these things be used and when can they not be used?  Can a counter be used in lieu of a basic maneuver?

2.  Defensive counters make sense, but offensive counters sounds vague.  Would "follow-up" be a more appropriate term for these special offensive maneuvers?

3.  There are some counters in there that appear passive, like street tough.  Do you think all passive counters could be separated into a new category, such as "abilities"?

The reason why I'm stressing the subject of categorizing so much is because with well-defined categories, you can have clean-cut rules that apply to every object within the category.  This means that you do not have to reiterate rules and you do not have to incorporate "special" notes that make those objects appear as mechanics independent of the core system.  Therefore, players and game masters will be able to retain those rules more effectively so that they need not reference the manual as much.

Basically, what I'm trying to do is give you some insight on the streamlining process.  The following is an example of a conceptual model that, although complex, would do away with a lot of fluff in the actual maneuver descriptions, thus having a positive net streamlining effect:

Turn Maneuvers
   Attack
      "Opening"
      "Slam"
      "Punch"
      "Kick"
   Defend (Passive)
      "Dodge"
Response Maneuvers - You may only use x maneuvers per round (conservation of combat time).
   Follow-ups -  Can only be used after your own triggering attack.
         "Double Tap"
         "Double Kick"
         Throws or takedowns after grabs can be put here too.
         Also: sustained burst fire
   Defend (Active) - Can only be used after an opponent's triggering attack.
      Standard
         "Back Flip"
         "Block"
         "Side Step"
         "Weave"
         "Duck"
         "Evasion"
         "Martial Block"
Free Counters - Can only be used after a successful Defend (Active).  There are no use limitations.
      "Riposte"
      "Face Off"
      "Hand-Eye Coordination"
Abilities - Does not need to be bound by time conservation rules, although may have a finite number of uses per fight or be based on a contingency (such as head shot).
   "Street Tough"
   "Cobra Strike"
   "Head Shot"
   "Nerve Strike"

Result: the "recoverable" keyword can probably be eliminated completely, including rules that decide when the chain actually stops (it will be immediately apparent).  Also, the "suspended animation" effect has been addressed.

Error: "face off" would probably be an active defensive response instead, since no defense precedes it.

Hello again Ar Kayon,

Thank you for the suggestions.  Some thoughts.

Quote1.  What's the difference between a basic maneuver and a counter?  When can these things be used and when can they not be used?  Can a counter be used in lieu of a basic maneuver?

Basic attacks are actions that you can only do on your turn and that take your action for that turn.  Their is no limit to the number of times they may be used in a fight.  In addition you automatically receive them as you rank up a given combat skill.

Basic maneuvers are similar to basic attacks in that they can be used any number of times in a combat and you get them automatically at the given skill ranks.  They are never attacks and may or may not take an action or be restricted to your turn.

Counters are also gained by increasing your combat skills but differ from basic attacks and maneuvers in the following ways:
1) They are limited, each time you use one it is expended for the fight.
2) You choose which counters you want to take with each rank of your skill.  You get 2 Defensive Counters and 1 Offensive Counter per rank of skill at ranks 1-5.  For rank 6+ you gain 2 Counters of any type.
3) Counters can only be used in response to something. Either an attack made against you or an attack you made.

Counter cannot be used in lieu of a basic maneuver.

Quote2.  Defensive counters make sense, but offensive counters sounds vague.  Would "follow-up" be a more appropriate term for these special offensive maneuvers?

I agree that Offensive Counter sounds vague.  Follow-up is certainly more reflective of what they actually are so yes I think I'll make that change.  Thank you.

Quote3.  There are some counters in there that appear passive, like street tough.  Do you think all passive counters could be separated into a new category, such as "abilities"?

I'll have to think about this some.  Limiting the number of Defensive Counters a character can use per turn, while realistic, has the potential to be very dangerous and heavily encourages focused fire which is not necessarily in keeping with the sorts of shows/movies I'm trying to simulate. 

Limiting the amount of Follow-ups is something I am/have considered and would likely be my first step. At one point I was going to limit them to one Follow-up per basic attack but that makes multi-attacks like Double Kick much more powerful. 

I suppose I could limit all characters to no more then X attacks each turn.  So if the limit was say 4 and you spent 2 of them doing a Double Kick as your basic attack you could only make 2 more through counters/follow-ups.

The down side of that is it is one more value players and the GM must track throughout the turn.

Adding an abilities category would require a lot of restructuring to how these powers are gained.  It may be worth doing but I'll want to get a few play tests down with the current system first to see if it would be beneficial.

Two thoughts I have had about this:

- Working back through a chain of attacks, counters, follow ups, defencive riposts, attacker defences, etc might get confusing and there is nothing more annoying than working through five actions only to forget the details of the initial attack. You might be better off providing the players with cards for each of their abilities so that they can move the cards into a central play area giving a visual representation of the combat sequence. The cards can also be a valuable reference for the different attacks. (I realise that D&D4and WFRP3 may already do something like this but I'm not sure as I have played neither - I am simply remembering chains of instants and interrupts twelve years ago in Magic: The Gathering)

- The basic dice mechanic is roll as many dice as you have points in the skill and each that rolls over a target (determined by deducting your stat from 10) is a success. Why not remove a level of complexity and have the dice pass if they roll equal to or less than your stat? You would need to increase all stats by 1 during character gen but that shouldn't be a problem.

Quote from: brianbloodaxe on April 05, 2010, 05:55:06 PM
Two thoughts I have had about this:

- Working back through a chain of attacks, counters, follow ups, defencive riposts, attacker defences, etc might get confusing and there is nothing more annoying than working through five actions only to forget the details of the initial attack. You might be better off providing the players with cards for each of their abilities so that they can move the cards into a central play area giving a visual representation of the combat sequence. The cards can also be a valuable reference for the different attacks. (I realise that D&D4and WFRP3 may already do something like this but I'm not sure as I have played neither - I am simply remembering chains of instants and interrupts twelve years ago in Magic: The Gathering)

I do visualize this system almost like playing cards.  Many of the powers are resolved immediately so hopefully that will reduce the need to work back through things.  Having said that I can see some spots in my example where I forgot to add a modifier provided by a counter so some sort of system of tracking that may be needed. Or perhaps as Ar Kayon  suggests a simplification of the system.

Quote
- The basic dice mechanic is roll as many dice as you have points in the skill and each that rolls over a target (determined by deducting your stat from 10) is a success. Why not remove a level of complexity and have the dice pass if they roll equal to or less than your stat? You would need to increase all stats by 1 during character gen but that shouldn't be a problem.

I'd not thought of that, I guess because I am used to a high roll being good.  I wonder which is harder for most players; to use a derived number which needs to be calculated once or adjust to wanting to roll a 1.  Anyone else have an opinion on that?

Oh and because I forgot to say it thank you for the feedback!  I really appreciate everyone's thoughts and time. 

Going through my game with an eye towards simplifying the system one of the first things that jumped out at me is the number of  penalties and modifiers I gave a large number of abilities in order to balance them.  Right now they are very add hock but I'd like to standardize them into a few easy to remember status conditions.

This requires some minor changes in the abilities but overall I think it is worth it.

Right now I am thinking:
Bleeding: A character who is bleeding takes 1 level of irresistible damage at the start of his turn, after which he may make a Con check to stop the bleeding. He continues to bleeding until he heals at least one level of lethal damage, a successful Medical check is made on him, or he succeeds at the Con check.
Bleeding profusely: A character who is bleeding profusely takes 5 dice [7] of irresistible damage at the start of each turn. He continues to bleeding profusely until he heals at least one level of lethal damage or a successful Medical check is made on him at a 3 dice penalty.
Crippled  All rolls made while crippled take a 1 die penalty and all natural movement is reduced by 3 inches.
Exposed: All defensive counter rolls made while exposed take a 2 dice penalty.
Off Balance: All attack rolls made take a 2 dice accuracy penalty.
Slow:  Any Defensive Counter roll made against a slow attack gains a 1 die bonus.
Staggered: All rolls made while staggered take a 1 die penalty.
Vicious: Any stun or K.O. checks made as the result of a vicious attack take a 1 die penalty.

Another thing I want to do is standardize multiple attacks into two categories. 
Combined Attack: When you make a combined attack two or more attack rolls are resolved simultaneously.  All attacks made must be against the same target and  bonuses to damage or accuracy only applies to one attack. Your target's Defensive Counter applies to both attacks. You may only make one Follow-up to a combined attack regardless of the number of attack rolls you make.

Multiple Attack: When making multiple attacks each attack is fully resolved before moving on to the next.  You may only make a Follow-up to the last attack roll.

Some examples of what the changes would look like.

QuoteDouble Tap: Make two attack rolls against your target as if you were Shooting, each with a 1 die penalty to accuracy.  Both attacks are resolved simultaneously. Any bonuses to damage or accuracy only applies to one attack and your target's Defensive Counter applies to both attacks.  After your targets Defensive Counter is resolved you may only use one Offensive Counter which also takes a 1 die penalty to accuracy.
                     Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used. 

Becomes

QuoteDouble Tap: Shoot your target twice with a 1 die penalty to accuracy.  This is a Combined Attack.
                     Special: You must be able to handle the recoil of the weapon used. 

Quote
Double-Kick: Make a Snap Kick attack against your target.  After that attack is fully resolved make a Side Kick attack against the same target.
                        Special: Until the start of your next turn all attack rolls against you gain a 2 dice bonus

Becomes

Quote
Double-Kick: As a Multiple Attack make a Snap Kick followed by a Side Kick.  Using Double-Kick leaves you Exposed until the beginning of your next turn.

QuoteCrippling Wound
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: If the triggering attack hit and did at least one level of damage your target takes a 2 dice penalty to attack rolls and a 3 inch penalty to any movement until the end of his next turn.

Becomes

QuoteCrippling Wound
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect: If the triggering attack hit and did at least one level of damage your target is Crippled until the end of his next turn.

And

QuoteBleeding Wound
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect:  If the triggering attack hit and did at least one level of lethal damage then at the beginning of your target's next turn he takes 1 level of irresistible lethal damage, after which he may make a Con check to stop the bleeding. He continues to take damage at the beginning of each turn until he heals at least one level of lethal damage, a successful Medical check is made on him, or he succeeds at the Con check.
             Special: The target must be able to bleed in some way for this counter to be effective.

Becomes:

QuoteBleeding Wound
Melee Offensive Counter, Recoverable
Effect:  If the triggering attack hit and did at least one level of lethal damage the target is Bleeding.

Immunity to bleeding would then be handled in the creatures description.

Does anyone see a reason not make this update?

Also does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement term for Multiple Attack?  I'm finding it awkward to work into ability descriptions.

Quote from: Mobius on April 07, 2010, 04:16:45 PM
Also does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement term for Multiple Attack?  I'm finding it awkward to work into ability descriptions.

Flurry?
Barrage?
Blitz?