News:

Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.

Main Menu

Gamism not for Game masters?

Started by Stefan / 1of3, April 19, 2005, 07:25:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

komradebob

Hmm. If you're making a game that is mostly meant to be played as one-shots AND there are rotating gamemaster possibilities, you might consider a reward system that rewards the //players, rather than their characters. If the same reward system is used for both the players and the gm, and the reward currency transfers with the player to new characters or a session as gm, you could have a very gamist game indeed.
Robert Earley-Clark

currently developing:The Village Game:Family storytelling with toys

Walt Freitag

Sven, and 1of3, you might both want to check out this thread which examined a similar issue. There seemed to be consensus at the time that gamist participation by a GM (referred to in that thread as the "esteem game") was quite possible, and quite common, with or without specific rules bringing it to the fore. That is, a GM can indeed "compete" with players despite having seemingly unlimited resources within the game. The key is understanding what the GM's socially understood victory and defeat conditons really are. If you think about real players' real reactions in play, it's clear that in the vast majority of cases, a GM victory is not a total party kill, and a hard-fought success by the player-characters is not a GM defeat.

Sven's prescription of "hard but not impossible" is the crux of it. I've likened this form of GM competition to a game of Blackjack -- or Chicken. You get cred for verging as close as possible to the threshold of disaster without going past it.

- Walt
Wandering in the diasporosphere

Stefan / 1of3

Intriguing.

What about that:

Normally the GM does not only create and controll the antagonists, but also controlls parts of setting, that are important in the conflict.

- The GM can grant the allies, clues and equipment - or deny them.
- The GM can use the environment against the players.
- The GM can attack, whenever he wants. (The PCs have to approach the antagonists first. Enemies do just appear.)

Before the session starts players and GM can spent points to controll these aspects.
That not only limits the the GM's power, but also helps to shape the session. If the players spend all their points for allies, the game might be about helping in defending a fortress.