Cascading ambiguity

[TonyLB]

Peter, I'm interested too.  I have no idea how much the player was deliberately presenting ambiguity in order to fish for input, and how much he was doing it for stylistic reasons.  It's a question worth asking him.

I think that what I'm largely missing is a clear notion in the Social Contract of when players should feel free to interfere with the actions of other players.  I thought far enough ahead to make it clear that the GMs actions were always up for revision and hijacking, but I didn't know (at the time) to ask what the rules should be about player actions.