*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2014, 05:18:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: What is IIEC?  (Read 8627 times)
Logan
Member

Posts: 153


« on: January 22, 2002, 09:26:10 AM »

..
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2002, 09:30:43 AM »

Logan,

IIEC refers to intent, initiation, execution, and completion; it's a followup on one of the "talk about it later" topics in my essay. The thread, begun by Manu, is http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=774">here.

A related thread, a similar followup and also begun by Manu, concerns task/conflict resolution and similar stuff, http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=773">here.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2002, 09:34:16 AM »

Yoicks!

Looking over the history of the discussion, I discover a terminological shift!

It was, intent, initiation, completion, and effect; now, for some reason I and others have been calling it intent, initiation, execution, and completion!

Damn! I call a terminology conference. I like the "execution" part for step 3 (I think Fang commented about how "completion" was too, well "over with" to be just right). I also think "effect" or "result" or "outcome" would be right for the last step.

So, IIEE? IIER? IIEO? Damn! All comments welcome.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Gordon C. Landis
Member

Posts: 1024

I am Custom-Built Games


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2002, 10:19:03 AM »

I was going to guess IIEC was acronym-speak for "If I Even Care" . . .

I like Intent, Initiation, Execution, Effect - double-I, double-E.  IIEO ("Outcome" at the end) works too, but makes me want to turn it into EIEIO. :-)
Logged

www.snap-game.com (under construction)
Paul Czege
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 2341


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2002, 10:36:06 AM »

Hey,

I think Outcome is probably more precise than Effect, in that it eliminates any hidden Narrativist bias toward resolution systems that always move the narrative along, always produce an effect. In some games, the Outcome is "no effect".

Paul
Logged

My Life with Master knows codependence.
And if you're doing anything with your Acts of Evil ashcan license, of course I'm curious and would love to hear about your plans
Le Joueur
Member

Posts: 1367


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2002, 04:04:18 PM »

Quote from: Ron Edwards
It was, intent, initiation, completion, and effect; now, for some reason I and others have been calling it intent, initiation, execution, and completion!

Damn! I call a terminology conference. I like the "execution" part for step 3 (I think Fang commented about how "completion" was too, well "over with" to be just right). I also think "effect" or "result" or "outcome" would be right for the last step.

So, IIEE? IIER? IIEO? Damn! All comments welcome.

I always prefered IIAC: Intent, Initiation, Action, Completion.

Fang Langford
Logged

Fang Langford is the creator of Scattershot presents: Universe 6 - The World of the Modern Fantastic.  Please stop by and help!
Manu
Member

Posts: 57


« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2002, 12:24:50 AM »

I root for IIEOC (Intent, Initiation, Execution, Outcome, Consequence).

I choose to separate Outcome (the localized impact of the action) from Consequences (the big picture); Let's say it's all about swinging a swort at a troll: O would be the possible wound to it, and C would be the impact on its morale, and maybe on the morale of  surroundings goblins.

Another example: a character tries to seduce a noble lady: O would be the efect of the smooth talker on the lady, and her reaction to it, and C would be the triggered consequences on the Relationship Map surrounding her.

Note that in both cases, the action might have been initiated with the initial intent of reaching the goal of C, and O is just a "side effect". Narrativist gamegroups might have a field day with this kind of way to look at things, and I even see it in Ron's Elfs, personally. (palyer's action as O, and character's action as C)

Just my 2 cents.

Manu
Logged

-------------
Manu
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!