News:

Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.

Main Menu

Narrativist Wargaming

Started by amiel, January 23, 2002, 12:49:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ben Morgan

A couple of days ago, my brother and I were thinking along almost the very same lines for a similar premise: a mob war.

Each player would be in charge of not a single character, but an organized crime faction.

There would have to be some kind of currency, that would govern not only the general influence of the faction, but also allow you to bring in specific characters (which, if simple enough in and of themselves, could be generated on-the-fly) and play them (at least part-time) like regular RPG characters.

Like Amiel, I would also want to keep a Narrativist bent to the whole affair.

No hard & fast mechanics yet, just a few basic ideas. I'll keep working on it. Later...
-----[Ben Morgan]-----[ad1066@gmail.com]-----
"I cast a spell! I wanna cast... Magic... Missile!"  -- Galstaff, Sorcerer of Light

contracycle

The matrix game principle I posted a little while ago works quite well in this regard, IMO.  In fact there is a tendency for RPG-like character identification which was not an intent for which the mechanics were conceived.
Impeach the bomber boys:
www.impeachblair.org
www.impeachbush.org

"He who loves practice without theory is like the sailor who boards ship without a rudder and compass and never knows where he may cast."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Mithras

Quote from: hardcoremoose
So what are the qualities of a war story that we find engaging?  

Well straight away I see the possibilities of dramatic storylines developing before the battle and being played out during the fight. The relationship of the commander with his aides and advisors, his relationship with his unit commanders. Their relationships with their men. The rivalries of the units. All this can be sketched out in a relationship map (of course) and the strengths of relationships under pressure mapped.

Now apply the pressure - battle.

Loyalties, rivalries, old scores, grudges, competition, honour and duty, sacrifice. The battlefield is a boiling arena for the clashing personalities of an army.

I think this is a grand idea!
Paul Elliott

Zozer Game Designs: Home to ultra-lite game The Ladder, ZENOBIA the fantasy Roman RPG, and Japanese cyberpunk game ZAIBATSU, Cthulhu add-ons, ancient Greeks and more -  //www.geocities.com/mithrapolis/games.html

amiel

Quote from: Mithras

Well straight away I see the possibilities of dramatic storylines developing before the battle and being played out during the fight. The relationship of the commander with his aides and advisors, his relationship with his unit commanders. Their relationships with their men. The rivalries of the units. All this can be sketched out in a relationship map (of course) and the strengths of relationships under pressure mapped.

Now apply the pressure - battle.

Loyalties, rivalries, old scores, grudges, competition, honour and duty, sacrifice. The battlefield is a boiling arena for the clashing personalities of an army.

Thank you, my god, thank you. Sometimes when I'm talking, I wonder if I'm communicating.
Thank you again to everyone else...I'll see what I can do with what I've got so far. I think just going over this has made it a lot more clear to me what it is I'm wanting to do.
-Jeremiah J. Davis
"Girl you know I love you. now ya gotta die." ICP