*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 02:13:15 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Layering Conflict Resoultion over Task Res.  (Read 983 times)
David Chunn
Member

Posts: 34


« on: April 25, 2005, 04:41:08 PM »

Does anyone have suggestions and methods for or experiences with layering conflict resolution over a task resolution system without changing the existing game mechanics? In other words, I don't want to change how the published game works (die rolls, techniques used, etc.), only how the results are interpreted.

I have some general ideas about how to do this by defining what's at stake with each roll. But since I've never tried doing this before, I'm seeking the wisdom of others. (Feel free to point me at any old threads relating to this. I couldn't find any.)

Thanks.
Logged
Adam Cerling
Member

Posts: 159

WhiteRat


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2005, 08:13:50 PM »

David --

Which published game are you interested in 'layering'? This thread has some notes on using conflict resolution and scene framing with Third Edition D&D.
Logged

Adam Cerling
In development: Ends and Means -- Live Role-Playing Focused on What Matters Most.
Ben Lehman
Member

Posts: 2094

Blissed


WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2005, 10:27:03 PM »

David:  Welcome to the Forge!

Quote from: David Chunn
Does anyone have suggestions and methods for or experiences with layering conflict resolution over a task resolution system without changing the existing game mechanics?


BL> No.

(but see below)

Quote
In other words, I don't want to change how the published game works (die rolls, techniques used, etc.), only how the results are interpreted.

I have some general ideas about how to do this by defining what's at stake with each roll...


BL>  This would work.  It is a pretty significant change to the existing game mechanics -- way bigger than, I don't know, changing from 1d20 to 2d10.  Apparently, Burning Wheel Revised has a really great section about this under "GM Advice" called Let it Ride.  You might want to check it out.

What game are you doing, why are you modifying it, and to what purpose?  If I have some context, it will be a lot easier for me to help you.

yrs--
--Ben
Logged

David Chunn
Member

Posts: 34


« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2005, 01:59:22 PM »

Thanks, Adam. That was exactly the sort of thing I was looking for as far as experiences go. Somehow I missed that one. I guess I don't check Actual Play often enough.

I'm using d6 Fantasy. My primary purposes in employing conflict resolution:

1. to facilitate player-character protagonism
2. limit GM fiat on my part
3. to add meaning and tension to every roll instead of an endless series of mostly meaningless task rolls.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!