The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 10:22:39 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
56
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
General Forge Forums
Actual Play
[T&T] A crowd of teenagers & way too many leprechaun
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [T&T] A crowd of teenagers & way too many leprechaun (Read 3984 times)
Callan S.
Member
Posts: 3588
[T&T] A crowd of teenagers & way too many leprechaun
«
Reply #15 on:
May 25, 2005, 04:44:07 PM »
Heya,
Quote
That being said, I don't think I'll change the decision I made.
That's cool. Once you decide to head in a certain direction, you'll also be concious of needing to decide to stop at some point. But when you haven't really decided to head in a direction and are just drawn to it, it never prompts you to stop. And you end up eating a whole bowl of chips and feeling sick.
Quote
The second option is, admittedlly, sloppier, and not supported by any other mechanics except group precedent (which you could maybe consider a Resource!),
Maybe a resource!? :) Man, it is THE resource! You might have stats for an axe given by a book, but its group precedent that determines if that axe exists in any given place.
I think mechanics to pick at those group resources directly haven't been developed much. Once you have determined a resource is there, we have plenty of rules for what it mechanically does. So once you know the axe is there, you have plenty of numbers to play with. But when it comes to picking at those resource, the rules out there for that seem to drift toward 'okay, everyone should just try really hard to judge it as it really is, otherwise their a poopy head'. And everytime I think, "To do that properly, I'd have to be playing simulationist in the first place". It's quite uncomfortable trying to be a good gamist, when you know the backbone of play (the group resource precedents) sum total mechanical support requires you to be a good simulationist.
Ranting...sorry!
Logged
Philosopher Gamer
<meaning></meaning>
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum