The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
February 18, 2019, 10:31:57 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
137
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Archive
RPG Theory
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits (Read 3643 times)
daMoose_Neo
Member
Posts: 890
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
on:
May 24, 2005, 07:21:21 PM »
Hmmkay, as I'm unsure how to summarize this in a couple words to search by, I'd like to ask the assistance of Forgites.
A system/setting sprung to mind earlier today and I'm still picking it all out. As of now entitled "Return to Innocence", gameplay will feature characters of rival (re: Hate each other with the passion of the nine hells) nations/clans forced to adventure together for a greater good, with part of the overall question being "Can they grow past their own differences to succeed?"
To do this, characters will have Traits and Taints, at the moment starting out at an equalibrium or slight edge to the Taints. Taints will allow an awesome edge in certain situations, and may indeed be neccesary upon first analysis, but at a steep cost: loss of Trait effectiveness and distancing self further from the rest of the party. Traits will also bestow skills and abilities, but at a weaker or less desirable effect than the Taint, but it lowers the Taint as used, becoming more effective over time.
So, I want/need to know: where else is a similar mechanic used, so as to avoid stepping on toes as well as gauge the effectiveness of my own ideas?
*edit* Discussion of such mechanics is also welcome, outside of the setting itself. Without that I realized this may be more a Design thread than a Theory thread.
Logged
Nate Petersen / daMoose
Neo Productions Unlimited!
Publisher of Final Twilight card game, Imp Game RPG, and more titles to come!
TonyLB
Member
Posts: 3702
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #1 on:
May 24, 2005, 07:49:30 PM »
Most people have a
very
good intuition for such systems. It's basically delayed gratification, right? Be really cool today, or ultra-cool tomorrow.
About the only way I've ever seen people flub such things is when they misjudged how long the campaign would last: I've seen folks who invested too much early effectiveness, then had the campaign fold before they cashed in. Likewise, I've seen people who played for today then found that the character became comparatively boring when the game lasted longer than they thought it would.
Logged
Just published:
Capes
New Project: Misery Bubblegum
daMoose_Neo
Member
Posts: 890
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #2 on:
May 24, 2005, 08:03:40 PM »
In my own application, I'd be especially keen on making both ends of the spectrum actually cool, but one closer to a stated goal than the other.
I suppose I'm thinking a Jedi/Sith arrangement, at least externally- we as fans for the most part think the Sith rock, but in the world of Star Wars it is widely considered a "Bad Thing". It also grants some awesome powers, but at that cost of a little bit of your 'soul' until its sucked you in.
Logged
Nate Petersen / daMoose
Neo Productions Unlimited!
Publisher of Final Twilight card game, Imp Game RPG, and more titles to come!
GB Steve
Member
Posts: 429
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #3 on:
May 25, 2005, 12:31:03 AM »
I've written up a mechanism along those lines in
Necronomicon
, my take on roleplaying H.P. Lovecraft.
It's a bit sketchy at the moment but the basic idea is that Mythos knowledge is so mind-bending and corrupting that to learn of it is to loose something of yourself, and to cross out one of your regular traits for ever. That's possibly a bit more brutal than you'd want but as the game is all about getting forbidden knowledge and using that to resolve a situation it ties in well with the background.
Logged
Callan S.
Member
Posts: 3588
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #4 on:
May 25, 2005, 03:58:06 PM »
Heya Tony,
It almost makes me think such effects should be on a per session basis, rather than being left to the meta game winds that control how long a campaign lasts.
So something like be cool now, at the start of the session, or ultra cool near the end of the session.
Logged
Philosopher Gamer
<meaning></meaning>
Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member
Posts: 10459
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #5 on:
May 26, 2005, 09:19:04 AM »
I dunno, Callan. Given pacing, I think everyone will wait. Unless you put important conflicts up front. But then you risk the session peak being anti-climactic.
Moose, thing is that what's bad for the character isn't neccesarily bad for the player. You have to look at the player incentives to see what will happen. For example, in narrativism play you frequently see players driving their characters to do things that seem unwise from an in-game persepective, but from the player perspective mean more fun.
Waaay back, somebody was working on a fantasy heartbreaker, and I told him that he had a problem - his chaos mages (or somesuch - ones that dealt with demonic energy) were supposedly disincentivized because of the negative repercussions of using the bad magic, like growing horns. I told him that this wasn't a negative repercussion for the player, and that, in fact, having a character with horns, no matter how inconvenient for the character, was just gravy for the player in most cases.
If you choose to play a character with a certain sort of issue, then the negative effects of that issue are just as fun as the positive ones, and represent an
incentive
, not a disincentive to play said sort of character.
Why are the Sith cool? Because they have made a deal with the devil for their powers. We know that they have issues that can be played. The Jedi, on the other hand, don't have an issue present, except, perhaps, whether or not they'll become Sith (or otherwise fall to the dark side).
Kewl powerz are only half of the equation.
So, you want to make the "weaker" option relatively more attractive? Well, don't go about it by giving the stronger option negative repercussions. Because it'll only make the problem worse. To "balance" options, just forget about the characters and what they think, and balance out what the players think is cool.
Mike
Logged
Member of
Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
daMoose_Neo
Member
Posts: 890
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #6 on:
May 31, 2005, 09:24:00 PM »
Quote from: Mike Holmes
You have to look at the player incentives to see what will happen.
Just to clear a weird brain-fart before hitting the hay, I'm pondering somehow quantifying a player's desires as well as a characters desires.
To further use the Anakin example, Anakin the character has traits such as "Protect those I love", "Uphold the law of the Republic", "Become a Master Jedi" but Anakin the player has desires such as "Lure to Dark Side", "Defeat former Master".
*Possible* idea might bea character generation whereby the Character and Player goals are at a little bit of odds with each other, so you're not only bartering/competing against a GM/World, but your character as well...or maybe this is bizzare rambling...
Logged
Nate Petersen / daMoose
Neo Productions Unlimited!
Publisher of Final Twilight card game, Imp Game RPG, and more titles to come!
Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member
Posts: 10459
Enticing drawback vs. weaker-but-desireable Traits
«
Reply #7 on:
June 01, 2005, 08:34:04 AM »
Sounds promising. Work on it when you're awake! :-)
Mike
Logged
Member of
Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum