Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Started by Emily Care, August 26, 2005, 02:25:03 PM
QuoteIf we are going to do this together, how do we do it so we don't hurt one another? Can we? And if so, how do we write our games so that other people can do the same?
Quote from: Meguey on August 26, 2005, 03:27:30 PMIt sounds like everyone was being fairly careful to check things first, and then it hit a wall. I hope other players can add more light to this.
Quote from: Ron Edwards on August 26, 2005, 03:02:37 PMAnd it strikes me very firmly, after discussing this game with a number of people who were involved, that at least a couple people were approaching playing Dogs as if it were in the other "superfamily." They assumed that if they were uncomfortable with what a given PC was about to be doing, that they had a say in vetting that stated action. Whereas, bluntly, the game is set up for exactly the opposite.Best,Ron
Quote from: lumpley on August 26, 2005, 04:00:21 PMThe game was problematic. Here's my free advice: think hard before you decide to bring two brothers raping a 14 year old girl into your game, and then think hard again before you actually go through with it. And yeah, I worked that out all by myself.
Quoteexecuting the boys without trial in cold blood
Quote from: Paka on August 26, 2005, 08:10:19 PMI don't understand why Ben is uncomfortable with Clinton's character's actions. Shouldn't he be allowed to author his own character's actions?