*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 19, 2014, 07:41:37 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 87 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: Structured Game Design (Warning: Long Post)  (Read 32490 times)
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2005, 07:03:43 PM »

Hello,

Scuse me folks - this thread isn't a discussion venue.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Tomas HVM
Member

Posts: 244


WWW
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2005, 01:11:38 AM »

Once I've got my list of assumptions and questions, I'll go through and make a list of what I consider to be the important elements of the game.  This is the first stage where I start making decisions about my design.
Roy, this is great thinking. I believe most successful game designers do this one way or another, but they (we) are more often than not unconscious about the "system" they are working by. You put words to it, and that is very useful. I've designed games for almost two decades, and still had some real eyeopeners reading your posts here. Thank you!
Logged

Tomas HVM
writer, storyteller, games designer
www.fabula.no
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2005, 09:15:45 AM »

Sigh.

This thread is not open for discussion.
Logged
jc_madden
Member

Posts: 37


« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2005, 09:20:26 AM »

Quote from: Roy
Ron thought it would be interesting to develop the idea further, so I'm starting a new thread dedicated to exploring this idea.  I would love for everyone to jump in and help us flesh this idea out.

Quote from: Roy
To the rest of you:  Is this thread helpful?  Do you agree with the advice here or disagree with it?

No rudeness intended; how is do this statement and questions fail to open this topic for discussion?  It seems like discussion has been initiated and approved by the original poster. If this is not the case, what about this topic should indicate that it is in fact not open for discussion so that I may avoid making the mistake of responding to something that is rhetorical? 

Logged
jc_madden
Member

Posts: 37


« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2005, 09:22:57 AM »

**how is do this statement....

Cannot edit orginal post.
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2005, 10:37:51 AM »

I will explain. When I say "do not post any more," then no one posts to the thread again. How you interpret the first post, what you quote from it, how you see it, and what you feel about it are of no importance at all. Don't post.

If you have a question about why not, then you send me a private message and ask.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!