*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 12, 2022, 07:26:44 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4285 Members Latest Member: - Jason DAngelo Most online today: 76 - most online ever: 565 (October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: A worthwhile exercise  (Read 3739 times)
TonyLB
Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 3702


WWW
« on: August 24, 2006, 07:29:45 PM »

Check out this AP thread and then maybe this one and this one.  You know what they had in common?  They all started from a common ground of strong preparation, and everyone took some time at the beginning of the session (and in some cases at the beginning of the scene) to get on the same page about what the scene was about and what it wasn't about.

So here's something I recommend.  It'll only cost you 15 mintues.  The next time you sit down to play Capes, take fifteen minutes and use it to talk about the scene you're about to play.  Not what's going to happen, and who should win which conflict, but "What's this scene going to be about?  What are these people, fundamentally, about?"

Then play the game.

I'd really like to hear what kind of results people get from such an addition.
Logged

Just published: Capes
New Project:  Misery Bubblegum
oreso
Member

Posts: 67


« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2006, 12:12:40 PM »

prepping beforehand doesnt have the benefit of the rules negotiating people's input, so if there's a guy with a strong vision, and its not something the other players can get into then you could do more harm than good. In a no prep game the play itself guides the play so everyone is involved.

Saying that though, i havent had this problem myself because my players are easy going and i know what they like, and as your AP showed, even strangers get on fine. 

This kinda thing can easily be discussed when the comics code is made though, so maybe i'd do it after the first session when everyone has an opinion on things.
Logged
Andrew Cooper
Member

Posts: 724


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2006, 07:09:35 PM »

Tony,

I did this at GenCon and I've done it at home before GenCon.  I didn't think it was that novel an idea so I never really just hammered on it here though.  In my Fantasy Capes game we spend 15 or 20 minutes discussing genre and setting conventions before playing.  It worked out really well.  The game was coherent and fun.  At GenCon this year I had 4 or 5 players and we discussed the style and the characters we wanted before playing.  It took about 15 minutes or so.  The game gelled a lot easier this way for us and didn't take off into the land of the silly.  I'm a fan of Capes prep.  While it isn't as intensive as many games, I'm surprised people get serious, coherent games without it.

Logged

Eric Provost
Member

Posts: 581


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2006, 07:42:58 PM »

I think that the failed game that we played would have benefited quite a bit from something like that.  We were really all over the board, having no clue where the game was taking us.  Fifteen minutes seems like a long time.  And I suppose that kind of illuminates a potential issue with our pacing too.

-Eric
Logged

Hans
Member

Posts: 576


« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2006, 08:26:55 AM »

The Capes in Missassauga project also began with this kind of process, and I think it benefited, even though in the end it was not completely successful.
Logged

* Want to know what your fair share of paying to feed the hungry is? http://www3.sympatico.ca/hans_messersmith/World_Hunger_Fair_Share_Number.htm
* Want to know what games I like? http://www.boardgamegeek.com/user/skalchemist
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!