Greed...But not really

[Jake Norwood]

Removal of SAs is something in the rules, at least in the first edition.

-Jeff

You amaze me, Jeff. If it's in first printing, its probably in 2nd, too. Dang...

Jake

[Jaif]

I'll have to work on my stage name then.  "The Amazing Jeff" just doesn't have much zing. :-)

Removal of SAs is something I agree with also.  Otherwise the SAs become convient situation modifiers.  The whole point with SAs, to me, is that they should tug at a character just as much as a character can use them.

-Jeff

[Thirsty Viking]

Removal of SAs is something I agree with also.  Otherwise the SAs become convient situation modifiers.  The whole point with SAs, to me, is that they should tug at a character just as much as a character can use them.
-Jeff

I think a Wise GM  would announce the Removal siultaneous with a granting in another SA...  perhaps Granting easier  because it is compensated for by the judged  Lack of playing a different one.

Of course once it reaches Zero....   the judge might announce a change in the SA  to an SA the judge thinks the Player has been playing and that fits the ongoing game...  still at Zero  so if the charachter doesn't like it  he can still change it.  Possibly the charachter might change back to his old SA  but now he knows he has to do better playing it to keep it.