The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 09:49:02 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
56
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Archive
Indie Game Design
(Moderator:
Ron Edwards
)
Diceless resolution mechanic
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Diceless resolution mechanic (Read 2217 times)
simon_hibbs
Member
Posts: 678
Diceless resolution mechanic
«
Reply #15 on:
October 01, 2002, 08:40:58 AM »
Quote from: Mike Holmes
???
I thought that by diceless, that you were actually looking for a "fortuneless" resoluton system.
What's wrong with dice? Assuming you're going to allow in fortune at all?
I suppose I got thinking about throwing in Plot Points as being a bit like throwing in chips in a poker game, and then thought, why not use cards, like in a poker game?
It's realy just a matter of what's the best way to preserve tension and suspense in conflict resolution. In less important contest you could just look at who's got the best skill, or stat. In medium-improtance contests you also take into acccount how many 'Fate Cards' cards each player threw in (a good time to dump your low cards), but in the most critical and suspenseful contests the values on the cards might be critical too.
It gives a nice sliding scale in terms of detail and tactical options in contest resolution.
Simon Hibbs
Logged
Simon Hibbs
Le Joueur
Member
Posts: 1367
I Like the Sound of That
«
Reply #16 on:
October 01, 2002, 10:14:12 AM »
Quote from: Mike Holmes
Why not instead use positive reinforcement? Have no PP, but just give "bonus dice" to any role that follows genre (or whatever you're trying to incentivize). As in Sorcerer, for example, or
a few other games that use such mechanics
. This is very similar in effect, really, but psychologically it's much more potent, and has no down side. I see players forget their Plot Points all the time, or feel afraid to lose them, and thus refrain from using them. But if a GM gives out "Bonus Dice" with regularity, the players grab for them on every roll like they were crack cocaine. As then the question is only how many dice do I get.
That sounds quite like what we're intending for
Scattershot's Genre Expectations Mechanix
and the "Bonus Dice" are Experience Dice, which also function as the Persona Development resource and Plot Device Mechanix. (Although we also leave open the 'refund idea' too, seeing that it
might
get used once in awhile.)
I hope another example is helpful.
Fang Langford
Logged
Fang Langford is the creator of
Scattershot presents: Universe 6 - The World of the Modern Fantastic
. Please stop by and help!
RPGuru59
Member
Posts: 5
Diceless Combat Resolution
«
Reply #17 on:
March 10, 2004, 02:32:07 PM »
I am designing a storytelling game called SAGE (Story Advanced Game Engine) that uses diceless combat resolution. I use a point based system, allowing the characters to give away points to get things resolved. Yet Resisted actions are of coarse a problem. Would anyone care to discuss the mechanics of diceless combat resolution?
Our points are called Karma points and a player uses them to do anything from pick a lock to open a door. I do not want anything too complicated in my game, thus I plan (only plan) on using nothing but Karma points. I know that some other games use stats and that would include separating the points. But I want it simple.
Yet how do you do this for combat with NPC's is it a barder system, whoever gives away the highest percentage of points wins, or is it skill plus the addition of points? Do let me know...
Logged
RaconteurX
Member
Posts: 262
Diceless resolution mechanic
«
Reply #18 on:
March 11, 2004, 07:45:36 AM »
I recommended checking out several other diceless games using resource-allocation
here
. All are well-done, but the latter two would probably be of greater inspiration.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum