News:

Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.

Main Menu

some info on TROS shields

Started by gmouser, May 22, 2003, 06:40:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

gmouser

Please correct me if I'm misinterpreting something:

1) Buckler: a small, usually circular, hand held shield not strapped to the forearm (that is a target or targa shield, uh?)

2) Round shield: well, just a round shield about 20''-24'' in diameter

3) Heater shield: a triangular shaped shield or a reduced size kite shield about 22''-28'' long

4) kite shield: the classical kite shield like this: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/MedNormK.jpg

Grey Mouser

Durgil

That looks right to me, just don't forget that the kite shield and even some heaters (knight shields) had a leather strap that went around the neck or around the neck and shoulder of the arm that it was on.
Tony Hamilton

Horror has a face... and you must make a friend of horror.  Horror and moral terror are your friends.  If they are not then they are enemies to be feared.  They are truly enemies.

Anthony I

Quote from: gmouserPlease correct me if I'm misinterpreting something:

1) Buckler: a small, usually circular, hand held shield not strapped to the forearm (that is a target or targa shield, uh?)

The targa/target/targe is just another name for shield, and one that comes out of antiquity-it appears to be old norse/germanic in origin, then used by the French [Franks] and later adopted by the English.  It means any type of small, light shield.  Di Grassi shows the targa to be a square medium sized shield gripped in the center (much like a buckler), Marozzo shows the targa to be a much smaller shield shaped more like a roof tile, but also used one handed.  I'd say trying to reduce  targa/target/targe to anything other than a generic term for a light shield will only work if you are also specifying a specific time and place, other wise the term is too broad.
Anthony I

Las Vegas RPG Club Memeber
found at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lv_rpg_club/

sirjaguar

I always thought a heater was a large, curved rectangular shield, as opposed to being tapered.  Maybe this is just because that's the way they were depicted in UO. :)
Lawson
 
             "Blue is my favorite color."

Lance D. Allen

UO's Heaters are totally wrong. I don't recall the exact name of that sort of shield, but a heater is your classical "shield" shape, as seen with coats of arms; ie, flat on the top, rounded down to a point on the bottom.
~Lance Allen
Wolves Den Publishing
Eternally Incipient Publisher of Mage Blade, ReCoil and Rats in the Walls

gmouser

thank you for your answers.
Now I'm wondering why in TROS the 'roman' rectangular large shield isn't reported  ); perhaps the rectangular one was a kind of shield not much used in the Middle Age,  or it was less manoeuvrable, or just a matter of taste....   (rounded things are prettier, you know.... ;-)))) )

Sorry for all these questioning, but I want to make use of the richness of this forum, since some of you have a great knowledge of the real historical period and know TROS too... an explosive mixture!

Grey Mouser

Salamander

The Roman Great Shield, or Scutum I believe was its official name, came out of use as the armour and weapons increased in effectiveness. As with many things, as the armour improved, the shields became smaller and/or more mobile. Of course we cannot discount the fact that the formation tactics of the Occidental Romans fell by the wayside as the Germaninc victors danced on their graves. Clearly defined formation tactics would not be seen in any appreciable degree again until the 1300's with the Swiss & German Mercenaries and the Italian Condotierre of the 1400s. Then they would be around until the advent of modern warfare (ca. 1936).
Just a theory. Anybody more learned is welcome to correct me.
"Don't fight your opponent's sword, fight your opponent. For as you fight my sword, I shall fight you. My sword shall be nicked, your body shall be peirced through and I shall have a new sword".

Valamir

Actually Sal, I think you're mixxing several different centuries of warfare together into "roman".  Not an uncommon mistake.  The armies of the late Roman Empire bore scant resemblance to the disciplined legions of citizen solidiers who had carved the empire.   In fact, in terms of numbers most of the troops in the legions of the late empire were as ethnically germanic as the barbarians they opposed.

Salamander

Quote from: ValamirActually Sal, I think you're mixxing several different centuries of warfare together into "roman".  Not an uncommon mistake.  The armies of the late Roman Empire bore scant resemblance to the disciplined legions of citizen solidiers who had carved the empire.   In fact, in terms of numbers most of the troops in the legions of the late empire were as ethnically germanic as the barbarians they opposed.

Good point. However I still believe that the scutum did fall by the way side due to a combination of the socio-political and technological upheaval of the time.
"Don't fight your opponent's sword, fight your opponent. For as you fight my sword, I shall fight you. My sword shall be nicked, your body shall be peirced through and I shall have a new sword".