*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 08:42:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 56 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Print
Author Topic: When Can We Stop Making "Games"?  (Read 3999 times)
simon_hibbs
Member

Posts: 678


« Reply #30 on: September 30, 2003, 06:22:00 AM »

Quote from: xechnao
While games directly force to respcect the rules and this could be considered education, art educates by teaching, which stands for showing you experiences of some* else's (hi)story or simply, experiences of some* else. Some* that is not yet you, that is still out and away of you.


I disagree. I think the experience of playing My Life With Master can be very illuminating. You are playign a characetr that is more than human in some ways, and less than human in others. In Shelly's masterpiece we empathise with the dilemas the moster faces through the artistry of her writing. In the game we empathise with our characters through the artistry of the game design.


Simon Hibbs
Logged

Simon Hibbs
xechnao
Member

Posts: 108


« Reply #31 on: September 30, 2003, 09:04:06 AM »

Quote from: simon_hibbs
Quote from: xechnao
While games directly force to respcect the rules and this could be considered education, art educates by teaching, which stands for showing you experiences of some* else's (hi)story or simply, experiences of some* else. Some* that is not yet you, that is still out and away of you.


I disagree. I think the experience of playing My Life With Master can be very illuminating. You are playign a characetr that is more than human in some ways, and less than human in others. In Shelly's masterpiece we empathise with the dilemas the moster faces through the artistry of her writing. In the game we empathise with our characters through the artistry of the game design.


Simon Hibbs


So where does your disagreement stand?
Logged
Marco
Member

Posts: 1741


WWW
« Reply #32 on: September 30, 2003, 09:52:53 AM »

Quote from: Jonathan Walton


Roleplaying is different.  Board & card games are differerent.  Until recently, comics was different too.  Within the general audience of people appreciating them, they were/are pure entertainment and nothing else.  I imagine that most people on the Forge would be willing to contest this view and say that, yes, roleplaying can have other motives too.  But I feel like we're a pretty strong minority and we don't really speak up much because we feel a bit silly.  The only way we really push for "meaningful" games is by designing ones that directly address certain issues.


I don't think this veiw is especially narrow or unusual (I see reference to it all the time on RPGnet). I know many people who consider RPG's to be in that category (and, as I said,  not just here).

I think a more pragmatic way to propogate such meaningful games is simply to run them.

-Marco
Note: Boardgames and card games lack a real narrativie structure of any sort. They can, as in some chess games, still be 'art' but not in the sense I think you mean here. But role-playing is a narrative expereince--even as an interactive one--and that doesn't in any way limit it.

Also Note: When talking about comics, what do you mean by "recently?"
Logged

---------------------------------------------
JAGS (Just Another Gaming System)
a free, high-quality, universal system at:
http://www.jagsrpg.org
Just Released: JAGS Wonderland
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!