*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 08:14:24 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 56 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: Statistics for Profiling, Fall 2003  (Read 2146 times)
Lxndr
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 1113

Master of the Inkstained Robes


WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2003, 04:46:09 PM »

Very few peopel are running the game.
I plan on running in #indierpgs after my fastlane playtesting is complete.
Logged

Alexander Cherry, Twisted Confessions Game Design
Maker of many fine story-games!
Moderator of Indie Netgaming
Emily Care
Member

Posts: 1126


WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2003, 09:08:54 AM »

Quote from: John Kim
As for it being surprising -- well, D&D is an enormously popular game in general.  I think this just shows that Forge-ites aren't totally separated from the general gaming community.

That is what I was surprised about. But given how large a percentage of all rpg gaming that has ever been done (in this country at least) has been d&d, it does make sense. Especially with all variants lumped, and as Ron pointed out, the local variation.

Quote
It doesn't surprise me at all that homebrewing is popular in a forum of game designers.

It's like asking micro-brewers about their favorite ale.

Interesting that the two tops are such broad categories, and can be seen to be at the extreme of the spectrum from traditional to non-traditional systems.  I bet the variability of each category accounts in large part for the fact that they beat out single systems.  

--Em
Logged

Koti ei ole koti ilman saunaa.

Black & Green Games
jrients
Member

Posts: 65


WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2003, 12:39:28 PM »

Quote from: Jonathan Walton
It's also interesting that Nobilis is consistently in the top 5 of games people want to play, often for the same people.  Is nobody running this game, or is nobody willing to fork over the $40 for the book?


Based upon discussions at rpg.net and elsewhere there seems to be an intimidation factor about GMing Nobilis.  The expansive setting, high power level of play, diceless mechanics, and sheer arty-ness seem to combine into a tough nut for some prospective GMs to crack.

I could be partially projecting my own insecurities onto others (I ran the game once primarily to overcome my own skittishness about doing so), but I've seen several explicit "I wish I could run it but it's so overwhelming" comments.
Logged

Jeff Rients
John Kim
Member

Posts: 1805


WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2003, 05:04:09 PM »

Just a notice that I have again updated the profiling stats to include the latest responses.  

http://www.darkshire.net/~jhkim/rpg/theory/theforge/

It might be interesting to do some studies on how these change over time.  Do the "Want to Try" actually make their way into "Last Played"?  I'd like to maybe do some study following people's choices over time.  It looks like there are currently 43 people with responses for both spring and fall.  It may be enough to be of some interest.
Logged

- John
arxhon
Member

Posts: 254


« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2003, 10:25:11 AM »

I just wandered into Actual Play because i was bored....

Nobilis is on my want to play list, and i have another person in my usual suspects list who also wants to play, but we're both afraid.

Despite that, i'm going to run a game of it soon, probably after Feng Shui (which is coming up in a couple of weeks).

Why did i not list it in my 3 Most Want to Play? Because i want to run the others more than i want to run Nobilis.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!