The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 08:59:13 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
56
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Archive
RPG Theory
Primal situation
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Primal situation (Read 1369 times)
Callan S.
Member
Posts: 3588
Primal situation
«
Reply #15 on:
December 07, 2003, 04:17:31 PM »
Okay, so I tried it yesterday. I think it did give more insight to each character so I'll be using it in future. Asking about feeling before the PC's put their plan into action was almost like a chance for them to forshadow thing in a way, too. I think it added a lot to a game which was essentially a one shot where people wouldn't otherwise express much about their characters. But I think some changes are due.
The sub optimal thing: One of the players was pursuing the suboptimal bonus for the bonus only. I feel in the long run that'll mean he would be placing feelings on his character that really don't mesh with what he wants. So he's gamist desire and PC narrative desire would end up clashing. I think I'll just use an honesty system instead. I'll ask 'Is what you said really important to your PC?' and if they say yes they get the bonus. If they abuse it, they'll be abusing their own character concept by saying things which aren't important to them are. Well, it'll sort of police itself.
XP: Although I asked a few times, it wasn't as often as I expected. The XP amount wasn't all that much, one player commented, and still felt that way after I explained its for the minimal effort of expressing what you should already know is in your PC's head. Anyway, I bumped up the XP.
Be careful, Callan!: Duh, I did this twice, instead of one at a time I just asked both players (yeah, small group yesterday) what their PC felt. Must knock into my own head, do it one at a time. Otherwise they both go to speak at the same time and it sort of squelches the quieter ones portrayal.
Logged
Philosopher Gamer
<meaning></meaning>
qxjit
Member
Posts: 20
Primal situation
«
Reply #16 on:
December 07, 2003, 08:53:48 PM »
Cool, I'm glad to hear it worked out well over all. I'm considering trying this in an upcoming short game, though I'll probably give bonus dice instead of XP. I do think that the honesty system is a bit better that favoring suboptimal feelings, though I'm inclined to assume that players want to express what their character is really feeling anyway. As long as you don't penalize them for the fear (or whatever) they just narrated of course.
Logged
--Dave
Callan S.
Member
Posts: 3588
Primal situation
«
Reply #17 on:
December 08, 2003, 02:36:43 PM »
Quote from: qxjit
Cool, I'm glad to hear it worked out well over all. I'm considering trying this in an upcoming short game, though I'll probably give bonus dice instead of XP. I do think that the honesty system is a bit better that favoring suboptimal feelings, though I'm inclined to assume that players want to express what their character is really feeling anyway. As long as you don't penalize them for the fear (or whatever) they just narrated of course.
Yeah, but I just wanted to encourage characters to not always feel confident and okay. A bit of fear is okay, as is just feeling happy sometimes (gah, they're so grim sometimes!). An honesty system is better, but it doesn't give them the message 'its okay for your male PC to actually feel fear or uncomfortableness sometimes' every time. You can tell them that before the game, but they may be inclined to forget in game, especially if no one else does it.
And god no, penalise them for the fear or whatever? Any faint idea on my behalf that it would be 'realistic' to do are blown away by just how much that would choke this whole idea up, not to mention RP in general.
Logged
Philosopher Gamer
<meaning></meaning>
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum