The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Why not just lock the damn things?
Started by: ethan_greer
Started on: 3/26/2004
Board: Moderators


On 3/26/2004 at 5:19am, ethan_greer wrote:
Why not just lock the damn things?

Hey folks,

There's a bit of a snafu going on over in the Long Term Game thread I started over in RPG Theory. I completed a post, hit Preview, and I saw Ron had closed it, but I was actually posting to encourage that the thread be closed anyway, so I figured I'd just leave a last message as a sort of final summary. I even explained for the benefit of the newbies (one of whom I encouraged to join) NOT TO POST TO A CLOSED THREAD.

So what happens? The newbies post. Now I'm irritated and a bit embarrassed. Grrr.

So the question is, why not just lock the threads in the first place? In a recent thread, Ron stated something to the effect that if locking threads was necessary the Forge wouldn't be something worth preserving. I disagree, and I'm interested in hearing the thoughts behind the statement and the current policy of verbally closing threads.

Message 10403#109653

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ethan_greer
...in which ethan_greer participated
...in Moderators
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 3/26/2004




On 3/26/2004 at 5:36am, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: Why not just lock the damn things?

Hi Ethan,

The last time we discussed this was in Locking things, as a foundation.

Best,
Ron

Forge Reference Links:
Topic 2344

Message 10403#109658

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Moderators
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 3/26/2004




On 3/26/2004 at 5:48am, ethan_greer wrote:
RE: Why not just lock the damn things?

Interesting. Thanks for the link, Ron.

Message 10403#109661

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ethan_greer
...in which ethan_greer participated
...in Moderators
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 3/26/2004