The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress
Started by: Spooky Fanboy
Started on: 4/3/2004
Board: Indie Game Design


On 4/3/2004 at 8:51am, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Okay, I started this game being fed up with games like Lost Gods, Black and White, the Last Exodus, Nobilis, etc. for various reasons.

My goal, in creating this game, was to create a game where the PCs start off as new, up-and-coming gods with one (or more) followers. The setting is remarkably similar to present-day Earth, with some exceptions:

The Big One is dead, or might as well be. He (She? It?), through an aggressive campaign of swordpoint-conversion, propaganda, and various double-dealings, took over control of every aspect of reality. Long story short, it went straight to His head. With great power comes great responsibility, and The Big One became so hubris-ridden that He became detached from His duties, and thus Unbelief crept in.

See, the universe runs on Faith, at a very deep and necessary level. When Faith dries up, things start to fall apart. This creates Unbelief, which is the universal equivalent of radioactive waste. The Big One's withdrawl from the day-to-day running of the universe radically increased Unbelief, to the point where it gained sentience, and manifested as The Nihilist God. It is Entropy personified, and will not stop until it has so clogged up the functioning of the universe that everything comes crashing down.

Luckily, there is a force at work older than the oldest gods, possibly older than the universe itself: The Wheel. The Wheel is the embodiment of the universal desire for growth and order. In reaction to the growth and sentience of Unbelief, The Wheel sent out agents among the only sentient creatures in the vicinity capable of generating Faith: humans. In various spam e-mails, unsolicited mail advertisements, and word-of-mouth campaigns, the servants of The Wheel have gathered together the ambitious, the daring, the imaginative, the creative, and others who weren't doing anything better at the time, and posed them two questions: Could you run the world better than it's being run now, and if so, are you willing to try? Those who answered yes became Embodied Gods, still-mortal manifestations of a particular portion of Reality called a Dominion, whose next step was to go out and gain believers. (Dominions are basically nouns: Roads, Freedom, Hedonism, Love, Mysteries, Literature, The Internet, Racism, War, Luck, etc.) Once the believers' Faith gained critical mass, the Embodied God would transcend earthly form and move up to being a Minor God, an incorporeal entity made entirely of Faith who could only be hurt by loss of Faith. (These new Gods were encouraged to pick their Dominions carefully; too small, and no one would bother following them, too big, and they'd spend too much of their time fighting for territory amongst other Gods. They were all encouraged, however, to pick Dominions they were interested in; The Wheel is willing to use competition as a way of weeding out the incompetent.) And so on, until a new Supreme Being could be chosen.

Experience and "levelling up" in this game works in a similar fashion to network marketing (think Amway): Gain followers, keep them, and improve them until they're ready to take over your Dominion. In conjunction with that, add more Dominions to your control so that there's room for advancement. (Try to stick to related Dominions in the early stages; it's easier that way.) Groom them to gain followers and diversify their portfolios, lather, rinse, and repeat. Use your stores of Faith to maintain your nascent pantheon, choke out Unbelief, and keep the universe running smoothly. Whatever you do, don't let your power go to your head, or you'll be overthrown by your competitors, if you're lucky, or by Unbelief if you're not.

Premise: What would you do if given the power of a god? Could you run the world better than it's being run now? How would you go about it? What are you willing to do to keep and build on your position? How would you combat apathy and its physical counterpart, entropy?

It's late, and I'll post my ideas for mechanics and where I feel I need help sometime later today. This was just to give you an overview of what i'm trying to do with this game, so that I could gain feedback on whether or not my mechanics were helping or hindering the ideas behind this game.

Message 10516#111135

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/3/2004 at 2:04pm, gobi wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

I love the idea, mainly because it takes itself a bit less seriously than Nobilis. This is just my impression of your first post, but it seems the core of play is inter-character coercion, intimidation and interaction in an effort to have them join the Cult of Nicotine or what-have-you. Is that what you imagine players actually doing when playing this game or am I reading it incorrectly?

Message 10516#111143

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by gobi
...in which gobi participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/3/2004 at 6:38pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Thank you, Mr. Solis, for allowing me to fill in something that I forgot to mention earlier: what the hell the players DO during the game!

First, the players in this game don't play just the ELD, they also play the worshippers/sub-dieties as well. The fun part is: the ELD and the followers don't always see eye-to-eye on things.

If you start playing on follower-level, you primarily have two core stats: Competence and Faith. Competence stands in for fighting, persuasion, knowledge, quick-thinking, and basic skills in general. Faith is how well you channel miracles from your ELD as well as how well you resist temptation to stray from the path. As your Competence increases, you can expand his/her repertoire (skills, talents, etc.) or you can sacrifice two points in your Competence Score to add a point to your Faith. (I envision each PC believer to start off with ten points to split between Competence and Faith; usually you end up with a follower whose competent and capable, but could be easily converted by a rival deity, or a "god junkie" whose loyal and devout and won't stray, but will probably eat a chunk out of your Faith pool casting miracles. ) You are essentially on the earth plane to be the sensory organs, arms, legs, mouth, and any other neccessary appendage of your deity. Due to rules against direct intervention between deities and their followers, they can only get obscure messages between the two. So, armed with their wits and their access to their deity, they have to promote their ELD's religion and goals.
The more Competent they get, the easier it is to get their job done; the more Faith they have, the larger the Faith Pool the deity has, but the easier it is for the follower to siphon off that Faith for miracles that may or may not be necessary.

If you're playing the ELD, you have to 1) manage your Faith Pool so that it doesn't run out at a critical juncture, 2) groom your believers to be competent, but not so competent that they lose Faith, 3) set up challenges to rival deities to either secure their own Dominion or steal a Dominion from another deity.

ELDs have scores in various miracles: Wrath (getting Biblical on some sorry m-----f----r's ass with plagues, lightning, etc.), Creation/ Preservation (pretty much what it says), Proclamation (twisting fate and luck to the deity's specifications; there is no "predicting the future" in this game, only believers who have expounded on their god's most recent Proclamation), Omnipresence (shifting between times and places; no, you cannot see or manifest in the future nor can you change the past), Aura (deals with possession, mind control, and exorcism; no, you can't use this to get Faith, because that has to be given voluntarily), and Dominion, which allows you to add to your other scores if you thematically tie them in to your Dominion.

The main attribute scores for a deity are Focus and Hubris. Focus is the ability of the ELD to figure out what's going on and act accordingly. Hubris is the ego of the ELD; too little Hubris, and the believers can siphon off miracles at a whim, and the ELD can be cowed or bullied by those with a higher Hubris. Too much Hubris, and the ELD risks getting cut off from his/her followers, thus following the Big One down the path of oblivion. Hubris accumulates; the only way to lower the score is to lose in a confrontation (nothing like defeat to wake you up!) or to make a roll of Focus vs. Hubris at the end of a crisis. If Focus wins Hubris gets lowered, if Hubris wins Focus gets lowered.

Now add all this to fact that each player also has to interact with the other players, either as allies or enemies, and you see how complicated this game can get.

The thing is, I'm looking for a rules-light system where each stat is important, yet they are balanced against each other so that adding to a score is equally a good idea and a bad idea; every score is equally important, none should be neglected, but trying to do an equal spread isn't such a hot idea, either. I do not want a Sim-heavy rules-set trying to cover for each and every possible situation; with this game it would be impossible and cumbersome, and I hate those systems anyway. I also want to emphasize through the mechanics that each decision is a balancing act on a very high and thin tightrope, thus my idea that the character stats should be minimal and occasionally in opposition to each other. I'm also looking for help on my reward system, to encourage players to roleplay the divide between ELD and believer, believer and believer (same Diety), believer and heretic (believer in some other ELD), and finally Deity vs. Deity ("There can be only one...") .

Message 10516#111152

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/3/2004 at 6:57pm, gobi wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

The goal of play still seems a little nebulous. For the followers, they're supposed to be the liason acting on behalf of the ELD, yes? So, to what end? If the players are playing both the ELD and the follower, does that mean they give themselves their own missions?

Okay, this is kind of an off-the-wall idea, but it might be entertaining if the players were all followers, or at least have that as a clearly defined "theatrical mode" or something. The GM, acting as the deity, creates a mission for a follower. To bring across the sense of incompetance getting in the way of correctly interpreting the deity's mission, the GM begins a game of "telephone." The GM tells the mission to another player who relays the message to another player, and so on until finally reaching the follower. The mission has most likely become so garbled that the player can have some fun trying to make sense of it in the context of his deity's general dominion.

For some reason, I get a Blues Brothers vibe. ("We're on a mission from God.")

Message 10516#111155

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by gobi
...in which gobi participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/3/2004 at 9:41pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

See, one of the ideas I had was that the players are sliding between levels. It's set up kinda like Trollbabe, where there are different levels of Stakes and Consequences. On the "personal" level, the player plays a follower struggling with the demands of real life versus the demands of his/her faith.

The ELD, on a broader scale, has to 1) keep his followers both happy and fixated on spreading the word, 2) keep his Dominion and encroach on other Gods' Dominions to keep his importance strong and his "franchise" growing, and 3) commit to chipping away at Unbelief and the Nihilist God's minions. The ELD cannot directly intervene (unless his believer(s) directly invoke him); he needs followers to act as conduits to the mortal world. There's also setting up an appropriate afterlife for the faithful, building reliquaries and churches (which act as "banks" of Faith, which accumulate extra Faith between sessions), and so on.

The Wheel's (GM's) job is to shift between these "levels", following the player's general direction while throwing occasional curve balls to keep the players hopping. Players sort of pick and choose their battles, and whether or not to intervene in crisis situations. (That doesn't mean that the players won't regret not being involved later...) A big plus to this is that (like Trollbabe) the players narrate the consequences of their failures while the GM narrates the result of successes. I'm envisioning a sort of Gamist/Narrativist hybrid, where the mechanics simulate the results of the decisions the ELD and his followers make.

It's partially meant to be a comedy of errors (based on the sometimes conflicting understandings and goals between Followers and ELDs), partially a satiric jab at religion, but also partly an Exploration of Premise, and hopefully that adds more depth and complexity to the game.

Is this making any sense? Is anyone interested in this besides me, or should that even matter? If so, I'll post my (rough) idea of mechanics in this post and ask for some help. I want to keep it simple, but I also want to cover the bases for all kinds of whacky stuff. If there's any confusion about what I'm shooting for, please ask: I'll be happy to clarify.

Message 10516#111168

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/3/2004 at 11:31pm, taalyn wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Sounds like fun, Spooky! Finally, I'll have a use for Beyugias (bee-you-gee-ess), god of Cartoons and Comics!

You've got some vague mentions of mechanics - anything else floating in your head yet? I can see a Donjon-like pool system being used...

Do you have any details or ideas on how miracles work?

Do players create their ELD, when they start as followers? That would seem the obvious way, since at some point they're going to become ELD as well, and they must have something in mind. I take it an ELD holds sway over the Dominions below them?

One of the things I see here is the potential for PvP narrative. I'm finding the idea of that very intriguing at the moment.

More! More! Give us some More!

A.

Message 10516#111178

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by taalyn
...in which taalyn participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2004




On 4/4/2004 at 1:23am, RaconteurX wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Sounds perfectly suited for Active Exploits... although I don't know how you feel about diceless games.

Message 10516#111182

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by RaconteurX
...in which RaconteurX participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/4/2004




On 4/4/2004 at 11:40am, Matt wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Heh, sounds quite interesting. It's a different take to the other god games out there.

I like the competence and faith idea for followers. Though I think you should be careful with it, or it might distract from the core premise.

-Matt

PS, you mentioned Lost Gods not being what you were looking for. I'd appreciate any feedback on the particulars of that. But that's for another thread...

Message 10516#111219

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Matt
...in which Matt participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/4/2004




On 4/4/2004 at 7:45pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Okay, a number of inquiries have popped up when I wasn't able to get to the computer. Thanks for the interest! To address them:

taalyn wrote: Finally, I'll have a use for Beyugias (bee-you-gee-ess), god of Cartoons and Comics!


And thank you for the sample character, Aidan! Now, here's a guy (girl?) who paid attention when the Servants of the Wheel offered some important tips:

1) If you're going to claim a Dominion, pick one you enjoy! (Check!)

2) Don't worry if that's an obscure Dominion; if you cultivate it properly, and market it correctly, it'll be easy for you to leverage it outward toward other, related Dominions when it's time to expand your franchise. Remember, it's not where you start, it's where you finish! (Check; Cartoons and Comics can easily be thematically expanded into Comedy, Entertainment, Satire, Unpredictability, Weird Fortune/Fate, Childhood, etc.)

3) If you start out small in terms of Dominion scale, odds are you won't have much competition during the critical start-up phase. (Check; Cartoons and Comics isn't as "sexy" or "profound" as War, Death, Love, Fertility, etc. but it is a chunk of Reality, nonetheless. Hence the field should be relatively clear at first.)

4) Don't worry in the beginning about being a "niche Deity." You might decide in your career that there's only so much of Reality you want to maintain/defend/rule over. That's fine; we've had one Supreme Being trying to run everything for awhile now, and you can see how well that's worked out! Reality is big, bigger than you'll ever be, so there's plenty room to share. (Check; the kind of person who'd want control of Cartoons and Comics is not someone I'd prefer in control of Physics, Love, or Wealth, and probably wouldn't be interested in those Dominions, either.)

5) You're a God now, so advertise accordingly! Be dramatic, mysterious, larger-than-(mortal)-life! Also, be sure to channel the above in a way appropriate to your Dominion(s) in your marketing/advertising strategy so that the public (who make this all possible, by the way) can instantly pick you out from the crowd. (Check; way to go, B-U-G-S, er, sorry, Beyugias!)

Now of course, that begs the obvious question, "Do you have a mechanic set up for how Deities leverage their smaller Dominions into bigger ones?" Not yet, and I'm not sure I need one; the disadvantages of having a bigger, more visible Dominion (increased competition) will easily outweigh the current advantages (more flexibility in the use of Dominion scores for ELDs). Still, I'm thinking about giving those Deities with "higher-tier" Dominions access to more Faith, which makes sense given that more people are affected by a more-encompassing Dominion. This, of course, requires me to provide rules-of-thumb to determine what seperates a low-tier Dominion from a high-tier one, and a system for determining how an ELD can move from one to the other. Any suggestions on this are more than welcome! ;-)

taalyn wrote: Do players create their ELD, when they start as followers? That would seem the obvious way, since at some point they're going to become ELD as well, and they must have something in mind. I take it an ELD holds sway over the Dominions below them?.


Yes, a player creates an ELD as well as a follower or followers. Yes, this means that the player, over the course of the game, is going to have to choose which character he is protraying at certain times. And yes, the believers, as they move up the ranks, inherit control of the low-tier Dominions that the ELD can't directly micromanage anymore. The ELD still retains control; he can replace any "sub-Deities" that can't manage the Dominion properly. Plus, the Deity gets a Faith "kickup" from any sub-Deities in his network. However, the sub-Dieties are in line to take over the franchise if the top ELD fails to pull his/her shit together during a Crisis.

Needless to say, the experience system I'm putting into place is going to follow this network-marketing model. It needs assembly. Again, any suggestions you have will be helpful.

taalyn wrote: One of the things I see here is the potential for PvP narrative.
Yep. Just because the players are friends, and the characters starting out have more important fish to fry than each other, doesn't mean that they won't tangle with each other at some point.

Matt wrote: I like the competence and faith idea for followers. Though I think you should be careful with it, or it might distract from the core premise.


1) Distraction from the Core Premise is *exactly* what I want to avoid. If you think that anything I've said muddies those waters, please let me know. I'm trying to keep this as simple as possible.

2) I'm not sure that it *IS* a distraction, however. Keep in mind, the players are roleplaying both Believers and the ELD. The Premise is about getting and keeping Power without losing sight of why you have it in the first place. As a Believer, it involves balancing your ability to function in the everyday world (Competence) versus their responsibilities to their ELD, which allows them a "direct hotline" to the ELD in emergencies (Faith). As an ELD, it involves paying attention to your "underlings" and helping them in times of crisis (Focus) versus building up your reputation as a mystery and hoarding your Faith (which fuels your miracles) for long-term, maximum benefit for all, meanwhile gaining clout and respect from your fellow Deities (Hubris). In short, the player has to balance the interests of (and share "stage-time" between) his Believers and his ELD. This is a game with multiple fronts and plenty of resulting Drama.

Matt wrote: PS, you mentioned Lost Gods not being what you were looking for. I'd appreciate any feedback on the particulars of that. But that's for another thread...


Eh, I think it's germane enough to mention it here, so I'll respond here.

Matt, Lost Gods is approaching similar ideas (gods wandering among and interacting with mortals) from the exact opposite angle I'm approaching it. Your game (assuming you are Matt Machell, I hope) deals with old deities at the end of their tether, living out their lives either trying to rebuild their faiths or live as best as they know how before becoming truly Lost or dead. The mood is one of twilight, of near-inevitable doom closing in; the question is not if you can avoid it, but how you will face it. Notable in your game is a lack of rules for churches, starting and sustaining a group of believers, or other means of "upward mobility." Indeed, each day of life drains them of their Faith, and what Faith they have they need to scavenge.

In my game, the Gods are young and fresh, with a (semi-) clean slate to work from. They have to invest in believers, churches, days of worship, etc. and I need rules for that. I also want to focus more on the ties between Believers and their Gods.

(Older Gods still exist, even some members from The Big One's franchise are still running around. The new Gods (and the Servants of the Wheel) refer to them as "M.O.Bs" (Miserable Old Bastards/Bitches), inflexible old Gods who couldn't hack it against the onset of either The Big One's advance or the rise of Unbelief. They are competition, and refuse to get out of the way. And they can fight back suprisingly hard for being "on the way out.")

Matt, this is important: I do not think your game, given the mood and theme it aims for, would necessarily benefit from additional mechanics for upward mobility. I like the game you made; I think it's well-designed for the stories you want it to tell. If you wanted to add rules for that, I'd buy it, play it, and run it. But even so, I'm looking for a game that also deals with Gods, believers, and the relationship between them. If I used your game, I'd have to do a whole lot of customization. This is the same problem I've run into with the other games I mentioned.

taalyn wrote: You've got some vague mentions of mechanics - anything else floating in your head yet? I can see a Donjon-like pool system being used...Do you have any details or ideas on how miracles work?
RanconteurX wrote: Sounds perfectly suited for Active Exploits... although I don't know how you feel about diceless games.


Next post, I promise.

Message 10516#111338

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/4/2004




On 4/4/2004 at 7:56pm, gobi wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Spooky Fanboy wrote: As a Believer, it involves balancing your ability to function in the everyday world (Competence) versus their responsibilities to their ELD, which allows them a "direct hotline" to the ELD in emergencies (Faith).


So there is some kind of dual-natured/mutually exclusive trait thing happening here? Higher competence means lower faith and vice versa? That's an interesting way to set things up since higher faith makes you look less credible to potential converts but higher competence distances you from the source of your faith (and funky abilities).

Message 10516#111342

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by gobi
...in which gobi participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/4/2004




On 4/4/2004 at 10:15pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

gobi wrote: So there is some kind of dual-natured/mutually exclusive trait thing happening here? Higher competence means lower faith and vice versa? That's an interesting way to set things up since higher faith makes you look less credible to potential converts but higher competence distances you from the source of your faith (and funky abilities).


Exactly what I'm shooting for! And to make it interesting, each ability should have it's plusses and downsides. And you have the divide between Competence and Faith pretty much right.

To answer Taalyn:

I want my mechanics light and simple. First, I'm lazy; I don't want to figure out how far my gun shoots, how much damage something does when it hits, how long someone can hold their breath underwater, etc. And I can't imagine people playing this game are all that eager to learn a crunchy system, either. Second, I believe I can channel this under System Does Matter to do as little skull-sweat on the math part of mechanics, but still develop a system to cover the things that are likely to occur during gameplay.

What I think of, as far as base mechanics go, is a basic d10-roll under mechanic. Adds are added to the target number (giving you a better chance of success) and minuses lower your success threshold.

Character creation (for Believers, to start with) divides 10 between the scores of Competence and Faith. You pick an Area of Specialty (Business, Public Speaking, Detective Work, etc.) which allows you to roll two d10s, take the better roll. You take an Area of Weakness, which makes you roll at a -1 to the TN. Also, you take a Temptation, which you'll need to roll your Faith score against when the subject of your Temptation is involved.

ELD creation is similar, with a divide between Focus and Hubris. Now of course, there needs to be more: Do I start with scores for the PC in miracles? Do I give character creation points with costs for Believers, Miracle levels, extra Dominions? Or do I just do a template system, or a combination of both? I'm not sure yet.

Faith is definitely going to be some sort of pool-mechanic, with miracles costing Faith and gathering Believers, churches, relics, making public displays of Miracles, and celebrations in your ELD's name add to the pool. You only have your starting pool to start with, and it doesn't replenish unless you invest in spreading your worship. Faith, I think should also be able to be spent to bump up Domains, improve Miracle scores, buy down Hubris (see below), and so on.

Now, when your worshippers call on you they roll their Faith in a contested roll versus your ELD's Hubris. If the Deity wins, the miracle doesn't come off; the Miracle points necessary are saved. If the Believer wins, the miracle is invoked. (Obviously, more work is needed on this...)

This is both good and bad; you can't have your Believers using you as a miracle dispenser, but you can't cut them off, either. Thus, each mechanic needs to be a balancing act. However, misses don't mean misses: like in Trollbabe, the GM narrates successes, while the players narrate failures.

That's all I have right now...more in the next post.

Message 10516#111378

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/4/2004




On 4/5/2004 at 1:38pm, Matt wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Matt, this is important: I do not think your game, given the mood and theme it aims for, would necessarily benefit from additional mechanics for upward mobility. I like the game you made; I think it's well-designed for the stories you want it to tell.


Heh, no they wouldn't suit, and I assumed that this was why it didn't fit your needs. I thought I'd check that it wasn't some hideous play experience with the rules though. Oh, and thanks for the kind words.

Back to the real topic at hand then.

-Matt

Message 10516#111647

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Matt
...in which Matt participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/5/2004




On 4/10/2004 at 2:33am, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Now, when your worshippers call on you they roll their Faith in a contested roll versus your ELD's Hubris. If the Deity wins, the miracle doesn't come off; the Miracle points necessary are saved. If the Believer wins, the miracle is invoked. (Obviously, more work is needed on this...)


Okay, some brainstorming...

Miracles have to be invoked at the Believer level. All Crises (adventures) start when the Believer notices something amiss, or there is an opportunity to exploit. This is important; the Believers are the eyes and ears of the Diety on Earth.

To invoke a Miracle, a Believer has to succeed on a Faith roll. Each Believer actively praying for assistance (beyond the first) raises the TN (to roll under) by 1. This gets a message through to the ELD.

Now, does the diety follow through, or ignore the request? That requires the Diety to roll a Focus roll and a Hubris roll. Whichever die rolls lower (while still hitting or going under the TN) wins out. I'll have to scale modifiers (or set examples of modifiers so that the Wheel can adjudicate appropriately) to reflect decrease in Faith pool (boosting the TN for Hubris) versus large prayer rallies, loss in Believers, etc. (boosting the TN for Focus).

Now, some thoughts: I'm thinking how to scale the Faith Pool appropriately, as I want Faith to 1) be used as the upgrade pool for ELDs to improve their Miracle proficiencies, Focus, Hubris (buy up or down), expansion into new Dominions, etc., and 2) be the pool from which Miracles are drawn from (setting up a conflict between "throw-away miracles" versus saving for a rainy day. Guess there's no other way to do that except through playtest.

Also, I have an idea that loss of a Believer (temporarily by him falling into temptation, permanently by premature death, conversion by another Deity, etc.) lowers the Faith Pool, and if the Pool goes into negatives, possible loss of the ELD's attributes.

Anyone have any suggestions? I'm glad that there are people who like the concept. That's a nice boost. But I'm having difficulty translating my ideas into simple mechanics. Any advice would be appreciated.

Message 10516#113718

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/10/2004




On 4/10/2004 at 2:42am, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Another problem:

I note that, by starting Crises off at the Believer level, I'm taking the ELD out of the picture bit by bit. I'm trying to balance it so that both the Believers and the ELD are given screen-time. Is this, in fact, impossible? Should I stick to Believers (still allowing for multiple characters per player), and have them design the Deity based on Faith points?

Perhaps that might be the way to go: have the players write up a Believer, let the GM control the ELD, and focus the game on letting the Believers convert followers (thus gaining more characters to play), sabotage rival Dieties, defuse similar sabotage directed at their Deity, and reap the rewards for success/punishment for failure.

Any thoughts?

Message 10516#113720

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/10/2004




On 4/10/2004 at 3:22am, taalyn wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Bunch of ideas for you:

- since you've got these dichotomies at the heart of the system (Hubris/Focus for example), why not have every roll involve both? That is, every player has one die representing one half of the dichotomy, and another die representing the other. I can see same die types, but different colors, or different die types as the "rank" of the trait. I can see this making for fun and complicated explanations, depending on win/win, win/lose, lose/win, or lose/lose.

- I'd want to play both believers and ELDs. None of this Wheel-as-ELD stuff for me, thanks. I wouldn't worry about screen time, as it seems to me that different aspects of the story, or even different stories altogether, would focus on one or the other. Sometimes I'd get to play converting other to the proper worship of Beyugias, and other times I'd get to play Beyugias smiting the temple of another god. Fun!

- I wonder if you can do Believers (instead, call them the Faithful?) something like Incarnate does past lives. That the ELD starts with X points as a Faith pool, and the Faith pool can be used (among other things) to define the Faithful. Of course, that makes it a little more complicated...

- ...but, it would introduce a nifty power level differentiation. The Faithful have the dichotomy, and ELDs have a Trichotomy (Hubris, Focus, and Fate?), with progressively more powerful deities having duadratomies, pentotomies, etc. Or maybe this is a crap idea....

- Miracles: don't have them rolled to succeed. Instead, have consequences, especially since the Faithful and the ELD are played by the same player. Miracles go off, if the player says so, and the the Faithful PC's Faith is high enough, but that causes a drop in the ELDs Faith pool. If the player decides no, the miracle doesn't go off, then the Faithful loses Faith. More of that fine jugggling act.

- Low Faith = bad for ELD, I like. In particular, I wonder if there isn't some way that the ELD's traits would be defined by his Faith pool? If Beyugias' Faith pool is 42, then that means he has Hubris X and Focus Y. If through miracles or Faithful attrition, his Faith pool drops to 27, then he has Hubris Z and Focus Q.

- It seems to me that the most important rolls would be in conversion and other ways of gaining Faith. Also very important is of course preventing the loss of Faith (particularly if the Faith pool is tied to ELD traits). I think the mechanic should focus there.

- I can see the need for a bunch of defining factors for the ELD, all of which would propel Faithful-level gameplay. Like Sins (Beyugias' #1 venal sin - eating pizza and reading comics simultaneously :), Temptations (the movie versions - Noooo!!), Blessings (superheroic powers), and so forth. It's probably obvious that Miracles would have to tie into domain - Beyugias' Faithful won't be inspiring romance, but they will be growing extra large boobs, long flowing hair, and suddenly wearing revealing and gravity-defying spandex. ;)

Spark any ideas? Talk to me, Spooky!

Aidan

Message 10516#113728

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by taalyn
...in which taalyn participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/10/2004




On 4/12/2004 at 4:13pm, Marhault wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

What about having the players play followers of each others ELDs?

Message 10516#114076

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Marhault
...in which Marhault participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/12/2004




On 4/14/2004 at 7:08pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

taalyn wrote: -since you've got these dichotomies at the heart of the system (Hubris/Focus for example), why not have every roll involve both? That is, every player has one die representing one half of the dichotomy, and another die representing the other. I can see same die types, but different colors, or different die types as the "rank" of the trait. I can see this making for fun and complicated explanations, depending on win/win, win/lose, lose/win, or lose/lose.


Has merit, and needs more thought on my part...

taalyn wrote: -I'd want to play both believers and ELDs. None of this Wheel-as-ELD stuff for me, thanks. I wouldn't worry about screen time, as it seems to me that different aspects of the story, or even different stories altogether, would focus on one or the other. Sometimes I'd get to play converting other to the proper worship of Beyugias, and other times I'd get to play Beyugias smiting the temple of another god. Fun!


True, but I want to keep the idea that the ball starts rolling with the actions of one of the Faithful. It emphasizes how important the Faithful are in this game.

taalyn wrote: -I wonder if you can do Believers (instead, call them the Faithful?) something like Incarnate does past lives. That the ELD starts with X points as a Faith pool, and the Faith pool can be used (among other things) to define the Faithful. Of course, that makes it a little more complicated....


I had an idea of creating Faithful with Faith points, with possibly giving the player a "free" Believer to start the game. How does Incarnate do this, out of curiosity?

taalyn wrote: -...but, it would introduce a nifty power level differentiation. The Faithful have the dichotomy, and ELDs have a Trichotomy (Hubris, Focus, and Fate?), with progressively more powerful deities having duadratomies, pentotomies, etc. Or maybe this is a crap idea....


Not gonna do it. 1) I'm lazy; simple mechanics are the best way to go. 2) I want to emphasize that there isn't all that much difference between ELDs and their Believers. What difference does exist, is the same difference between line-level employees of a company and the "higher-ups" in that same company, just magnified.

taalyn wrote: -Miracles: don't have them rolled to succeed. Instead, have consequences, especially since the Faithful and the ELD are played by the same player. Miracles go off, if the player says so, and the the Faithful PC's Faith is high enough, but that causes a drop in the ELDs Faith pool. If the player decides no, the miracle doesn't go off, then the Faithful loses Faith. More of that fine jugggling act.


I want to keep the rolls; again, it emphasizes the communication gap between the Deity and the Faithful. Inter-character conflict is a feature of the game, not a bug. ;-) Just because the characters are controlled by the same player is not a sufficient excuse to wave away that gap.

taalyn wrote: - Low Faith = bad for ELD, I like. In particular, I wonder if there isn't some way that the ELD's traits would be defined by his Faith pool? If Beyugias' Faith pool is 42, then that means he has Hubris X and Focus Y. If through miracles or Faithful attrition, his Faith pool drops to 27, then he has Hubris Z and Focus Q.

- It seems to me that the most important rolls would be in conversion and other ways of gaining Faith. Also very important is of course preventing the loss of Faith (particularly if the Faith pool is tied to ELD traits). I think the mechanic should focus there.


These are things I'm working on. Originally, I only wanted to lower the ELD's attributes through Faith lost by Believer attrition, but that would de-emphasize the importance of having Hubris at reasonable levels.

This, of course, ties in to just how much Faith should be required to create miracles, sustain Deities at particular levels of competence, etc. That involves math and playtesting, both of which I've at short supply.

taalyn wrote: -I can see the need for a bunch of defining factors for the ELD, all of which would propel Faithful-level gameplay. Like Sins (Beyugias' #1 venal sin - eating pizza and reading comics simultaneously :), Temptations (the movie versions - Noooo!!), Blessings (superheroic powers), and so forth. It's probably obvious that Miracles would have to tie into domain - Beyugias' Faithful won't be inspiring romance, but they will be growing extra large boobs, long flowing hair, and suddenly wearing revealing and gravity-defying spandex. ;)


Definitely something I'm incorporating, however:

Note that Dominion (as I currently have it) is designed to supplement the Entry-Level Deity's Miracle stats (adding to the TN you have to roll under); while it pays to play to your Dominion as far as ease of Miracles (the balancer being that you have to customize your Miracle accordingly and convincingly), you are not limited to your Dominion in performing Miracles. Beyugias can indeed inspire romance the old-fashioned way, but will have a much-easier time doing it if he (she?) tailors it according to Dominion. Any ELD can reach Supreme Deity status, even Beyugias. (The mind boggles at the results, but it can still happen...)

Marhault wrote: What about having the players play followers of each others ELDs?


Ah, now this might be a way to go!

Picture this: Each session, one player plays his/her ELD, the other players play the Faithful. Next session, another player plays her ELD, and the rest of the players play her Faithful, until everyone's had their chance, and then it starts over.

Benefits: I don't need to calculate how many Faith points each Believer beyond the first one costs; they are considered "freebies." It emphasizes the rift between Believer and Deity. No one is left with nothing to do. Any leftover Faithful can be played by the ELD's player.

Thoughts?

Message 10516#114582

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/14/2004




On 4/21/2004 at 3:57pm, Spooky Fanboy wrote:
RE: Entry-Level Dieties: a roleplaying game in progress

Okay, I think I've gotten enough from here to help me with the basics. I just have to connect the dots at this point. I'll take our suggestions, add some necessary ingredients, and see what I come up with. Playtest document dead ahead!

Message 10516#115817

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spooky Fanboy
...in which Spooky Fanboy participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/21/2004