The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics
Started by: Bifi
Started on: 5/3/2004
Board: Actual Play


On 5/3/2004 at 12:51pm, Bifi wrote:
[Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hi all,

we started to play Sorcerer and met the following issues:

1. If a NPC/monster has more total penalties than, let's say, its Stamina, is it allowed to act? Or how is it limited? Is the 1 die in "defence" still rolled? Is it able to use the Will mechanics to gain dice?

2. In one of the previous posts there was something like this: If you are hit in a round before you act, your roll stands but the penalty gained is added to opposing dice. How does that work in the next round? And if the total penalties lower your opponent's dice to zero or below - is there 1 opposing dice and do you gain the rest as bonus dice?

3. The "saving victories" mechanics: I see the 2 options for using it in order to ensure a Total Victory. But how is it used in order to avoid Total Victory (as there are no "non-victory" dice)?

BTW: How many dice do you actually use during a session? Last session we had a combat between 2 strong characters and one beast, no demons. If we wanted the rolls to stay on the table, there was a situation where ca. 25 dice wasn't enough.

Thanks,
Michal

Message 11043#117450

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Bifi
...in which Bifi participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/3/2004




On 5/3/2004 at 4:04pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hello,

I love Sorcerer questions.

1. If a NPC/monster has more total penalties than, let's say, its Stamina, is it allowed to act? Or how is it limited? Is the 1 die in "defence" still rolled? Is it able to use the Will mechanics to gain dice?


This answer applies to PCs just like NPCs. Let's talk about defense first. In these circumstances, the character rolls 1 die for defense, and a die is added to the offensive roll (just roll the die and add it to the guy's existing pool, which might be sitting there already rolled).

So if Gary has -4 penalties and a Stamina 4, and Barry is hitting him with 5 dice, then Gary rolls 1 die for defense and Barry gets to add a die on his side, for a total of 6. It's the currency equation in action.

Offense (or more accurately, stated actions) is a little trickier. The answer is basically "as above," but do note that the character's total penalties may put limits on his or her stated actions. One of the tables in the combat section (reproduced in the final pages) is all about this.

2. In one of the previous posts there was something like this: If you are hit in a round before you act, your roll stands but the penalty gained is added to opposing dice. How does that work in the next round?


Doesn't matter. The issue concerns action by action, not round by round. Temporary penalties apply to the next action, regardless of whether it occurs later in the same round or in the next round entirely.

There's no "re-set" of any scores or penalties between rounds in Sorcerer. Rounds are only defined by "clashes" or sub-sets within an action sequence, taking everyone into account.

And if the total penalties lower your opponent's dice to zero or below - is there 1 opposing dice and do you gain the rest as bonus dice?


Yes, as described above.

3. The "saving victories" mechanics: I see the 2 options for using it in order to ensure a Total Victory. But how is it used in order to avoid Total Victory (as there are no "non-victory" dice)?


There's an older thread about this in the Adept Press forum, begun by Supplanter. I apologize for not hunting it, but I'm seriously time- and equipment-constrained. I'll come back in a bit and cite it for you.

BTW: How many dice do you actually use during a session? Last session we had a combat between 2 strong characters and one beast, no demons. If we wanted the rolls to stay on the table, there was a situation where ca. 25 dice wasn't enough.


25 seems excessive for that situation, but not too much. Play in general seems to require about 10 dice per player and about twice that for the GM.

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#117466

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/3/2004




On 5/4/2004 at 12:15pm, Bifi wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Ron,

Thanks for your answers.

I found this: http://www.indie-rpgs.com/viewtopic.php?t=588&highlight=sorcerer

However, it doesn't answer how to avoid Total Victory being scored against you since there are no "non-victory" dice you might cancel (and even if you did you would make it a Total Victory). My players intuitively understood it as either ensuring Total Victory for their characters or cancelling opponent's success dice.

Best,
Michal

Forge Reference Links:
Topic 588

Message 11043#117598

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Bifi
...in which Bifi participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/4/2004




On 5/4/2004 at 2:19pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hello,

Ah! A quick look at the book and I'm all set.

If the opponent scores a Total Victory against you with X dice, and if you have X or more saved victories from a previous successful roll, then you may cancel all of his victorious dice (i.e. his whole roll).

Technically, he still succeeds against you with 1 victory, but he does not get a Total Victory (or even the effects of all those dice).

Message 11043#117623

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/4/2004




On 5/4/2004 at 9:43pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Oh look! I noticed something else in your first post.

You asked, whether a monster/NPC could utilize Will dice to overcome overwhelming penalties. Although it was embedded in a more important issue about the dice themselves, it's worth answering on its own.

Only sorcerer characters (PC or NPC) may make use of the rules which permit a character to roll Will against a desired number of dice, when they want to take action under otherwise-whelmingly-impaired conditions.

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#117761

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/4/2004




On 5/5/2004 at 8:10am, Bifi wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Ron Edwards wrote: Only sorcerer characters (PC or NPC) may make use of the rules which permit a character to roll Will against a desired number of dice, when they want to take action under otherwise-whelmingly-impaired conditions.


I have to thank you again, your answers prove to be most helpful. During our yesterday's session one of the players questioned the mentioned Will mechanics. His argument went along the lines that you could gain more dice than you have usually in this situation (a character with, let's say, Stamina 2 and Will 7 would easily be able to get 5-6 dice, or even with luck more than 10 (just because someone bashed you on the head and you're seeing stars). Maybe I missed something in the rules, nevertheless we house-ruled it to a maximum that you would normally get (i.e. 2 in this case).
What's your take?

Thanks again,
Bifi

Message 11043#117816

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Bifi
...in which Bifi participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/5/2004




On 5/5/2004 at 2:27pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hiya,

That's not a house rule, that is the rule. You can gain dice back up to the score's value, not more. (Bonuses can add to that, but not the primary Will roll.) You guys just missed the text about that and fixed it "back" on your own.

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#117833

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/5/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 6:13am, Bifi wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

OK, so we're on the track. Thanks again Ron, take care.
M

Message 11043#118162

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Bifi
...in which Bifi participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 2:10pm, Rob MacDougall wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Can I piggyback a related question on this question?

When a sorcerer succeeds in their Will roll to temporarily regain Stamina (or some other score) do they then gain a number of dice equal to the Victories they rolled on the Will roll or do they automatically get the amount of dice they were going for by rolling any degree of Victory?

Rob

Message 11043#118201

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Rob MacDougall
...in which Rob MacDougall participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 2:34pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hi Rob,

The latter. If my character is carrying five current (temporary + lasting) penalties and his Stamina is 3, and I successfully roll his Will (5) vs. all 3 Stamina, and if I succeed, then I have 3 Stamina now. The victories from that roll are irrelevant to the value of the "restored" score.

Conceivably, they may be brought in as some kind of roll-over for later rolls if the circumstances work for it.

Also, that Stamina score is not affected by any damage for the next action, and subsequently, all the temporary penalties are gone (they never actually had any effect in play either).

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#118207

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 4:36pm, Rob MacDougall wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Gotcha. Thanks!
Rob

Message 11043#118238

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Rob MacDougall
...in which Rob MacDougall participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 4:41pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Damn, reading my post, I realize that someone might misunderstand something.

It is as follows: the restored score is merely ignoring the damage that previously assigned the penalties. It is not "immune" to damage that's delivered later, nor to lasting penalties following the next action.

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#118241

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/7/2004 at 5:30pm, Rob MacDougall wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Right. So the sorcerer gets one action at the restored score, then goes back to suffering whatever lasting penalties they were suffering - but the "next action" penalties on that action have now elapsed. And if they're still in the hole Stamina-wise, there's no reason the Sorcerer can't do the Will thing again next round, right?

Rob

Message 11043#118261

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Rob MacDougall
...in which Rob MacDougall participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/7/2004




On 5/8/2004 at 3:36am, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: [Sorcerer] Questions on Combat Mechanics

Hi,

Right on all counts, Rob.

Best,
Ron

Message 11043#118370

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 5/8/2004