The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Capturing the Spirit
Started by: Cynthia Celeste Miller
Started on: 12/31/2001
Board: Indie Game Design


On 12/31/2001 at 4:32pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
Capturing the Spirit

This topic is inspired by the "Playtesting" thread over on the Publishing forum.

I'm all about capturing the mood and spirit of the game setting / genre using any means available. Flavor text, layout, page design---you name it.

So, I got to wondering what techniques and methods you guys (not meaning gender-specific, obviously) think works best for this.

I know that it's all relative to the genre / setting in question, but still....

Message 1115#10461

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 5:52pm, Blake Hutchins wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Hi Cynthia,

Fluffy though it may seem, I usually start by using stats and skills named for the genre or flavor in question. Looking at DP9's Tribe 8, which I consider a very fine instance of world-building, the flavor is a bit undermined for me by the naming conventions of the Silhouette system. Stats like "Creativity," "Influence," and "Unarmed Damage" distance me a shade from the world and (potentially) the story.

Prime example of a well-done instance of this kind of immersive naming is John Tynes's take on a WEG d6-based Stargate SG-1. The three stats were Muscle, Flex, and Savvy, which combined with the training manual conceit and writing style of the remainder of the rules worked very well at establishing a "look and feel" for the game.

Best,

Blake

Message 1115#10476

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Blake Hutchins
...in which Blake Hutchins participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 6:02pm, John Wick wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Capturing the spirit of a race is easy. Think about and discuss what they believe.

In the history of humanity, there has never truly been an atheistic culture. More than anything else, what people _believe_ defines them. More than economics (how much does a horse cost?), more than politics, more than _anything_.

For me, the most fascinating aspect of Arthurian myth isn't the armor or the weapons or the politics. It's the fact that people were being killed for espousing the notion of "romantic love." Now _that's_ drama.

Take care,
John

Message 1115#10478

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by John Wick
...in which John Wick participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 6:19pm, JSDiamond wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Music is good, as long as you're not like, "Hey, let's listen to this while we game!"

Make the flavor 'real' by making it common. Like it's always been there.

In terms of character creation: the person first, the numbers last.

J

Message 1115#10480

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by JSDiamond
...in which JSDiamond participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 6:31pm, Jack Spencer Jr wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Well, Cynthia, it's like this. Every project is it's own challenge in this and other regards. The techniques used are naturally limited to what you can include in the book or box.

One of the best ways is for the game itself to reinforce the mood & spirit. I usually cite Everyway for this. It is the game that gave a fantasy feel most strongly in it's mechanics over most other fantasy games I have played, thanks largely to the torot-like fate deck. Compare this to D&D. What says "fantasy" in rolling a twenty-sided die?

Then there's art, flavor text, page layout and so on. These all kind of go together. The best advice is to make sure that the art or fiction or whatever reinforces the spirit. They can be radically different pieces in style and such, so long as the same mood is evoked.

Now, the layout and design of an RPG book is the subject of a fairly heated debate, heated out-of-proportion to the subjectmatter IMO, because an RPG book has two functions.

It should be entertaining to read in itself. This is important, especially if the game is not going to be played. I would say at least 90% of the RPG material I own has not been used. Others may have a larger collection and a smaller percentage unused, but some people have a group they can tear away from the holy trilogy (no, the other holy trilogy) long enough to play something else. If a book is just boring outside of play, I am unlikely to pick it up. If it looks cool and is well written, I may consider it. (And if I'm in this sort of situation, there are probably others. I am not unique)

On the other hand, a RPG book is a reference book. This means is should contain necessary information to start playing and be well cross-reference to be able to find a particular rule quickley when the situation comes up.

In a sense, I believe it should be like poetry, convey the game in as succinct a manner as possible. You can always add more later.

In fact, if you are printing up a hard copy you probably will need to add more. I have done so myself, but I've been told that printers prefer to print up book with page numbers of multible of some number, 15 IIRC but I'm sure I don't. This means, using this number, if you have a book that is 130 pp. then you'll need to find 5 more pages of filler or cut ten to get a multiple of 15. This is a good excuse to add that full-page piece of art or whatever you've cut in the initial planning stage.

ANd a note on flavor text. Well, it's like this. I fancy myself a writer, too, and I can understand the desire to write a story or two for your game. But the truth is they aren't as useful or inspirational as we'd like to think, especially those pieces that are just plain bad. The may get read once and then they're just filler. When someone purchases a RPG, they want to have their own adventures, not read about someone else's. As a rule of thumb, and like all rules of thumb it will depend on your thumb, my dictionary defines a short story as being up to 30,000 words. Take one tenth of that. When you hit or pass 3,000 words (or better yet, three pages), think long and hard about the piece, what you're trying to say with it and why you're including it in you book.

Page layout and design is another one of those sore points, it seems. How many complains have you seen for the new Player's Handbook? Yeah. Me too. To be honest the last game I saw with a decent layout is SOrcerer. It has a nice, clean layout sprinkled with just enough artwork. It goes back to the utility of the book. A page made to look like it was spattered with blood may be difficult to read. If it's difficult to read, then the point of the book is lost. WHat is a book for if not to be read?

In any case, all of this falls under the Your Milage May Vary heading. Just my take on it.

Message 1115#10482

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jack Spencer Jr
...in which Jack Spencer Jr participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 6:48pm, Blake Hutchins wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Take a look at Dying Earth for excellent delivery of flavor and mood, from art to the Vancian writing style.

Fiction writer though I am, fiction isn't something I want in my game books. There are exceptions, of course. C.J. Carella's Witchcraft has, in my opinion, the absolute best game-book fiction of anything on the market. Some of the best artwork, too. Tribe 8 delivers its setting information entirely via narrative voice fiction -- which incidentally reinforces setting, mood and the oral culture of the tribes. Some of the Heavy Gear stuff stands up, but it's not particularly compelling. I also like the Castle Falkenstein narrative, since it's mostly a Tribe 8 style approach to delivering background information; it's breezy and entertaining, and I've quite enjoyed it.

White Wolf has pushed this fiction in the book approach, but they've fallen into the trap of using crap writing in many of their books. If you're going to include fiction, use good stuff.

I suggest that any fiction/flavor text serve an illustrative purpose, either by conveying mood or supplying setting detail. For what it's worth, I would avoid the objective of telling a story alongside your rules unless there is some useful correlation.

Best,

Blake

Message 1115#10487

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Blake Hutchins
...in which Blake Hutchins participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 7:39pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Thanks for all the opinions on the matter.

For what it's worth (which is roughly a plug-nickel), I believe we've done a pretty good job of conveying the flavor of the genre in Cartoon Action Hour. It proved to be a bit tougher than you'd think, since the "action-adventure cartoon" genre is pretty much several genres combined, but with a certain spin on them.

Anyway, here's what we've done;

1) Pages: The book's layout has a very 80's pop culture look to it. One type of sidebar looks like a retro television set and the background of the pages has a very subtle, unobstructive star-like thingie ( a bit difficult to explain---but think of the stars used for the Super Friends logo).

2) Writing: I've tried to keep the game text rather conversational and lite. I tried to convey the light-heartedness of the genre without cramming it down the readers' throats.

3) Kargorr: The book has occasional sidebars narrated by a snide, but incompetent cartoon style master villain. For examples, check out http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?topic=1101&forum=12&4 .

4) Advice: I've included a lot of bits about the different conventions of the genre---like how stuffing garbage cans over a thug's head and torso will keep them occupied during combat, for example. "Who turned the lights out?"

5) System: The system has many built-in mechanics designed specifically to reflect the tone and feel of the retro-toons. One example of this is how "character death" is replaced with "out of the fight"....which is followed by a selection of common excuses for a character going out of the fight ("The attack blasts the stone archway above the character, causing it to collapse, thus burying him in rubble").

6) Jargon: We refer to campaigns as a "series", adventures as "episodes", etc. Normally, I prefer to stick to the standard names for such things, but I felt it added a splash of color. I didn't go too far with it though, like calling the GM the "Cartoon Master Guy" and such. lol

7) Sample Series: At the end of the book, there will be several ready-to-run series and a bunch of series-hooks. Hopefully, these will get the reader into the right mindset.

8) Artwork: Last but not least, the artwork (masterfully done by Jared Brown and Leanne Shaw) captures the spirit of the retro-toons. They both have a very solid understanding of the source material and it shows.

Hopefully, it will work out. =0)




Forge Reference Links:
Topic 1101

Message 1115#10492

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 11:10pm, James V. West wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Hey

Cartoon Action Hour sounds great! The idea of the master villain is good. So is the way you deal with character "death".

I agree with most of what's been said already. I especially click with the satatement that using generic terms puts a distance between me and the game. For example, the term Game Master. Its boring and does nothing to promote the feel of the game. If you make a TJ Hooker game why not call the GM the "Captain" or something?

Some people argue that it doesn't matter, but I disagree entirely. Calling a GM a GM would be like naming the new Honda Accord "New Model Automobile". Its a label. A form of something.


Message 1115#10504

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 11:35pm, Jack Spencer Jr wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit


On 2001-12-31 18:10, James V. West wrote:

I agree with most of what's been said already. I especially click with the satatement that using generic terms puts a distance between me and the game. For example, the term Game Master. Its boring and does nothing to promote the feel of the game. If you make a TJ Hooker game why not call the GM the "Captain" or something?


On one hand I agree, on the other hand I don't.

This is one of those variable milage issues. For some games, the new terms they coin for "GM" or whatever are pretentious and just don't fly. For others it doesn't. Sometimes it just seems like the time the author spent coining a new term for things that already have servicable terms is just time better spent doing something else. Like playtesting or something.

I mean, how often does the term GM come up in a game? How often do you play a game with a different term but refer to it as GM anyway (I do that for D&D)

Personally, I find that sort of thing beside the point, but whatever. Who am I to judge?


Some people argue that it doesn't matter, but I disagree entirely. Calling a GM a GM would be like naming the new Honda Accord "New Model Automobile". Its a label. A form of something.


I disagree here.

The Accord analogy would be true if ever RPG that came out was called "D&D" or something similar.

As it stands, an Accord is an Accord. An Acclaim is an Acclaim. And they both have steering wheels, seats, windshield wipers and headlights. Parts of the whole and no need for a new term just because they're on a new kind of car.

[ This Message was edited by: pblock on 2001-12-31 18:56 ]

Message 1115#10506

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jack Spencer Jr
...in which Jack Spencer Jr participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 12/31/2001 at 11:48pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Cartoon Action Hour sounds great! The idea of the master villain is good. So is the way you deal with character "death".


Thank you, James. =0)

Some people argue that it doesn't matter, but I disagree entirely. Calling a GM a GM would be like naming the new Honda Accord "New Model Automobile". Its a label. A form of something.


Actually, if you re-read my statement, I mention that I didn't use new jargon for most things. Just enough of them to add color. I left GM intact. Sorry to disappoint here. lol.



_________________
Cynthia Celeste Miller
-Spectrum Game Studios

[ This Message was edited by: Cynthia Celeste Miller on 2001-12-31 18:49 ]

Message 1115#10507

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/31/2001




On 1/1/2002 at 12:44am, Blake Hutchins wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Hmm. Speaking for myself, I don't care about the terms not actually used during gameplay, so I couldn't give a tinker's damn about "GM" or "Storyteller," "player" or "actor." On the other hand, stat and skill names are pretty important to me, since they come up during virtually every game I've ever played.

Cartoon Action Hour sounds pretty cool, Cynthia. Even though I'm not a fan of that genre in RPGs, it sounds like y'all are on the right track.

Best,

Blake

Message 1115#10510

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Blake Hutchins
...in which Blake Hutchins participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 12:54am, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

I truly appreciate the kind words, Blake. =0)

Anyway, yeah, I can understand why you don't care which terms are used. Myself, I have mixed feelings about such things. So, I used a few new terms, but not for everything.

Message 1115#10511

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 1:30am, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Hey all,

I stand firmly on the side of using evocative terminology. Anyone ever checked out Gygax's Dangerous Journeys (or whatever it was) - that game had to have been the worst in terms of language use. And this is the guy who gave us D&D. Sheesh.

As far as text goes...there's a line to be walked there. I like text that conveys the tone of the game...The Whispering Vault and Kill Puppies For Satan are two of my favorite examples of this. But your text can't get in the way of the reader's understanding of the rules. I labored over the WYRD ashcan for months trying to get the right feel to the text, and finally ditched it in favor of a straightforward, almost academic approach. The rules were just too different from anything else I had ever read...I didn't know how to make them understood and use colorful language at the same time. Fortunately, I've got a pretty damned good editor for the full print version. :smile:

For fun in my spare time (don't let Wick see see this) I've been working on a little werewolf game. Now that's allowed me to be a bit more colorful - stats like Bark and Bite, and a condescending tone to the text (the werewolves are like pets, you see...). It's not as complete as I would like it - WYRD and a (hopefully) imminent Sorcerer & Sword project have been consuming most of my time - but anyone who wants to take a look can find it here:

http://hardcoreroleplaying.homestead.com/lapdogs.html

So there, I got a shameless plug in. That's a day's work.

- Scott

[ This Message was edited by: hardcoremoose on 2001-12-31 20:32 ]

Message 1115#10512

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 7:18am, James V. West wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit


On 2001-12-31 20:30, hardcoremoose wrote:
Hey all,

I stand firmly on the side of using evocative terminology. Anyone ever checked out Gygax's Dangerous Journeys (or whatever it was) - that game had to have been the worst in terms of language use. And this is the guy who gave us D&D. Sheesh.



I guess me and Moose are art-weirdos :smile:. I take the presentation of my creations just as seriously as the way they play. In fact, I can't imagine doing it any other way. (side note: this is no indication that I'm actually *good* at it, just that I prefer to try) I spend a lot more time reading, looking, and flipping through the games on my shelf than I do playing them--but that's mainly because I've been without a decent group for far too long.

So my point was that, just as "system does matter", so does everything else. Take the GURPS Vampire for example. A game that's supposed to be dramatic and gothic done to a rigid sim. I don't play Vampire, but it hurt me just to look at the GURPS version. I thought the original Vampire had too many rules anyway.

Maybe using GM was a poor choice for the argument. It doesn't really come up that much during play, I know, so I can live with it in most games (just not mine). But other terms that *do* get used a lot ought to evoke the right feel, just as everyone has already said.


Message 1115#10519

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 3:49pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

I take the presentation of my creations just as seriously as the way they play.

As do I. To me, Castle Falkenstein is an infinitely more intriguing product than, say, Amber. Castle Falkenstein was laid out and presented to capture the reader's imagination and suck them into that setting. On the other hand, Amber's presentation was bland and didn't convey any of the elements Amber is notorious for.

In fact, I believe it was Castle Falkenstein and Paranoia that really opened my eyes to how effective a tool non-system aspects could be in making the game come alive.

Hopefully, when you see my game, you'll agree that I put a great deal of thought into the matter.

Maybe using GM was a poor choice for the argument. It doesn't really come up that much during play, I know, so I can live with it in most games (just not mine). But other terms that *do* get used a lot ought to evoke the right feel, just as everyone has already said.

I can see the point of using an alternative to the word "Game Master", so I don't think it was a poor example. I simply didn't want to go overboard with new jargon. A few examples of game terms I used to convey the spirit of the source material:

* Oomph: a stat in the game that represents "that something extra" a hero or villain has (transported over from my Four Colors rpg).

* Series: campaign

* Episode: adventure

* Hurt Points: "hit points"

* Channel: chapter

Message 1115#10521

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 4:15pm, Jack Spencer Jr wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit



On 2001-12-31 20:30, hardcoremoose wrote:
Hey all,

I stand firmly on the side of using evocative terminology. Anyone ever checked out Gygax's Dangerous Journeys (or whatever it was) - that game had to have been the worst in terms of language use. And this is the guy who gave us D&D. Sheesh.


I did a quick search and found a review on RPGnet that gives some of the terms Gygax used (and an interesting discussion below about how Gygax may-or-may-not have created the system) All I have to say is, after the 1st ed AD&D books, I'm unsurprised that Gygax used loopy terms like that.


Movement rates are postulated on suffient daily rest periods so as to obviate the necessity for any protracted rest periods of a day or more during the course of any journey. If normal movement is exceeded, however, then special rest periods in addition to any subsumed brief breaks in travel are required.


From the 1st ed DMG.

(side note: this sort of thing is usually a good thing to avoid in your game, flowery or denseprose in one way or another. It's a good idea to simply state what you mean. But AD&D was a big seller, so this is no guarentee)



On 2002-01-01 02:18, James V. West wrote:

So my point was that, just as "system does matter", so does everything else.


I does, but like any other artwork is should not be forced or it will feel forced, fake, pretentious, etc. Cynthia's replacing the terms "adventure" and "campaign" with "series" and "episode" works. Some others don't work so well. It's like the author is saying "Hey, look at how different my game is from all the other games you can buy" but in reality you're dealing with a D&D clone and you tick off the original terms in your head (Defense Protraction means Aromor Class; Impractical Fortune Resolution means Saving Throw, etc.)

Then again, I am of two minds on this. "Campaign" is part of RPG's wargaming heritage and kicking the sand off our feet, as it were, isn't a bad idea.



On 2002-01-01 02:18, James V. West wrote:

Maybe using GM was a poor choice for the argument. It doesn't really come up that much during play, I know, so I can live with it in most games (just not mine). But other terms that *do* get used a lot ought to evoke the right feel, just as everyone has already said.


But then, this depends on what you're talking about. Many of the terms outside of the realm of "GM" or even "Dice" or "Character Sheet" are refering to the mechanics of the game itself, and some of them must be renamed (doesn't WotC have a trademark on Armor Class? I heard they did or they wanted to) and others simply have no parallel in a given game system. (My game The Wheel has no new term for To Hit {as in To Hit Armor Class Zer0} because there are no mechanics for that sort of thing {I actively tried to have no mechanics in the traditional sense, but I digress})

What I mean is, for most of the oft used terms in a game they will be changed out of necessity or, more accurately, are probably new mechanics and will require a new name in most cases. Which leaves coining new terms for less important parts. Less important in the sense that the term isn't used often in-game.

But, like I said, milage will vary and it's part of the challenge to know when to money with it and when to not fix something that isn't broken.

Message 1115#10522

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jack Spencer Jr
...in which Jack Spencer Jr participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 8:11pm, James V. West wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Cool lingo for Cartoon Action Hour.

Seems like we're all on the same page here.

Each game should be treated as its own entity--which it is. I belive it is always necessary to look at the language and determine what will work best and never to just slap on a traditional moniker without considering if it does the best job.

I find that a lot of the game ideas I have are best suited to certain standard terms ("Adventure" being the one that pops to mind first), but unsuited for others (GM being the primary one). In The Questing Beast, I use the term Guide for the role of the GM because you don't "master" that game, you "guide" it.

Likewise, I'm working on an S&S genre game now and it looks like the term Game Master might actually be the best pick.


Message 1115#10530

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 6:19pm, Laurel wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Little Fears is a game that I think went to a lot of work to "capture" the spirit. I liked the game itself tremendously; I didn't personally like the layout of the character sheet and felt that the childlike trait names and terminology actually distracted me rather than enhancing the experience.

I'm opposed to "filler" art. I personally would rather have more text, and a handful of high quality + pertinent pieces of art. I'm a big fan of title fonts and page number styles and borders that work with a game's theme but don't overshadow it. Subtle almost always works better than glaring attempts at 'in the spirit' in my opinion.

One of my biggest pet peeves about game design is the use of awkward fonts, graphics, or colors to give specific pages a 'special' touch that renders them virtually unreadable. Utility over art, in my opinion.

Message 1115#10568

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Laurel
...in which Laurel participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 8:13pm, Mike Holmes wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit


On 2002-01-02 13:19, Laurel wrote:
Utility over art, in my opinion.

Amen. Nothing worse than a beautiful page that makes your eyes bleed reading it. When I buy a game I want something that I can use as a reference when I need to, not something to distract me. Less art, more content, better layout.

Just my opinion,

Mike

Message 1115#10573

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Mike Holmes
...in which Mike Holmes participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 8:32pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

You said a mouthful, Laurel.

While I believe a game book should be a work of art in it's own right, people are paying their hard-earned sheckles for a game. As such, it's not good idea to lose sight of this fact.

There's a fine line between stylish and gaudy.

Message 1115#10576

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 4:53pm, Laurel wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Of course, I say off this as a writer non-artist :smile: I couldn't actually do that kind of spirited-but-utilitarian layout without a patient and willing artist's imput, most likely.

Message 1115#10673

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Laurel
...in which Laurel participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002




On 1/5/2002 at 4:32am, Spawn wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

For me, really great art always captures the mood of an RPG, whether its the cartoon action hour style, fantasy, realistic interperetations etc.

Theres just something inspiring about seeing a *really* great piece of art thats related to the game you are going to play, and you know its great if it makes you go "I HAVE to play this......."

How many people have seen a great painting on the cover of a RPG book and picked it up to have a look? (I do it all the time, so im hoping everyone doesnt reply saying "what the hell are you talking about, I dont even LOOK at the covers!" so I didnt just make an idiot of myself :D

Of course, you DO need to find someone capable of those kinds of pictures (though obviously it depends on what style you wanted them done in and so on in the first place!), which isnt easy, so I realise im not much help at all! :oops:

Message 1115#10705

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spawn
...in which Spawn participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/5/2002




On 1/5/2002 at 5:44am, James V. West wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

Covers. Yes indeed. I am drawn to good covers and repelled by bad ones.

But I do have certain criteria for judging a cover (and by the way, this includes all artwork on any product).

First, I don't like Boris Vallejo's wax body style. So I generally look over anything that looks like that. Second, I'm a Frazetta freak all the way so I'm drawn to that style. Third, I'm a big small press fan so I'm always drawn to anything that looks crude, amateur, or just off-the-wall.

If a game has artwork that appeals to me, I'm much more likely to buy it or want it. If the art does nothing for me, it actually deters me from having anything to do with it, even if the system or idea is good. This is personal. So many GURPS books never sparked my attention even when I was into that game because they had so much "thrown on" artwork--and none of it worked together in a pleasing manner.

The old ADnD books are cool because some of that art is very amateur (which I dig) and some is just damn evocative (like Jim Roslof and Bill Willingham--bless their hearts).

Look at Sorcerer. The cover is both edgy and evocative. I love it. It draws me in.

I bought Dragon magazines before I ever played an rpg just because I loved the cover art.

But I agree that the bottom line is the game. It's all about the game. Yet, the game is much, much more than just a system slapped on a setting thrown into a book with some pictures to fill in the white spaces. It has to click. Everything has to mesh.

Message 1115#10709

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/5/2002




On 1/5/2002 at 8:11am, Spawn wrote:
RE: Capturing the Spirit

James V. West wrote:

I bought Dragon magazines before I ever played an rpg just because I loved the cover art.



Glad im not the only one to do that! :)

Message 1115#10714

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Spawn
...in which Spawn participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/5/2002