The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: The Iron Devils Quandary
Started by: James V. West
Started on: 1/1/2002
Board: Indie Game Design


On 1/1/2002 at 9:22pm, James V. West wrote:
The Iron Devils Quandary

I’m writing a game based on the Sword and Sorcery sub-genre of fantasy. Its called Iron Devils and its primarily based on the style and atmosphere of stories written by Robert E. Howard, Fritz Leiber, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Tanith Lee, and Michael Moorcock. The goal is to evoke that sense of brawn vs. black magic that I fell in love with in the pages of Marvel Comic’s SAVAGE SWORD OF CONAN.

The biggest issue I’ve struggled with so far is setting. There’s a red devil on my left shoulder that keeps telling me “You don’t want a setting! A setting will ruin the game!” and a cherubic angel on my right shoulder saying “Don’t try to make this game generic! You have great setting ideas. Write a setting into it.”

For the most part, I’m going with the devil. I want to get right at the heart of what makes S&S tick and if I lay it out with maps and place names I’m afraid that magic will be lost. Part of what made reading the Elric books so great for me was that I really didn’t know much about the world as a whole. It didn’t matter. All that mattered was what was happening right there, in the moment.

But I’m also very wary of the pitfall of making the game too open-ended. Its not a universal system, its a genre game. I’m writing the rules specifically for S&S.

I have an idea for setting and it is inspired by my reading of REH’s Conan stories. In those tales you’re often inundated with place names that aren’t given any real weight or definition. But the names themselves are evocative and Howard often attaches *some* color to them as he does with his mention of the darkish sorcery of Stygia. I know he wrote an essay on his world and in it he describes the various peoples and the landscape. But the real magic happens when you don’t know that stuff. I confess I owned a Conan collection for years and read every single story in it but I never read the entire essay on the world of Conan. I didn’t realize it at the time, but I was sub-consciously avoiding the details because I didn’t want the world to be spoiled. I wanted to see it only as Conan brought it to life, not as the author exposed it. Reading the details was boring. Reading the stories was exciting.

So my idea is pretty simple. The game talks about the various themes of S&S such as willpower and strength coming from within rather than from anyone else or anything else. Sorcery is more ancient and alien than anything else in the world, except the gods (who are inaccessible, ineffective, and cruel). Men who try to master strange powers become servants of it. It is a darkish environment. Players would create adventurers in this dark world and name their homelands as they chose. They could tag a real-world culture as a model for their character’s culture and name the land in a similar fashion (much like Howard did in his Hyborea).

The game would be episodic and could happen out of sequence in most cases, skipping backwards in the characters’ careers. The world *could* be laid out beforehand in any detail the group wanted, using some simple tools provided in the game if needed. The worlds of Conan or the Grey Mouser could be used as the group chose, but mostly the setting would unfold as the game unfolds and would always have a certain vagueness to it (not unlike the shadowy world of Tanith Lee‘s Flat Earth). Also, I would create at least one setting, separate from the game, that could be used.

The setting wouldn’t matter as much as the themes: savage tales of natural might and prowess against un-natural sorcery, nameless demons, and dead gods.

Anyone have any thoughts on this? Am I being blind to something here? I’m really into the idea of making this a genre-based and not a setting-based game, I’d just like to hear some varying opinions.

Message 1121#10536

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/1/2002 at 11:48pm, Uncle Dark wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

James,

One way to introduce setting through the back door would be to create some major NPCs, of the sort you'd find in the middle of a relationship map. This would allow you to define the nescesary backstory for them, which (naturally) establishes something of the setting. Then give write-ups to the Players as "example characters."

The advantage this has over presenting a ready-made setting on its own is that it demonstrates how setting elements are attatched to characters, and not the other way around. It shows them what you mean when you say that they will be co-creating the setting through their characters. It fulfills one function of a premade setting -- giving players common points of reference to attatch to -- without making the setting primary in their minds.

Lon

Message 1121#10538

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Uncle Dark
...in which Uncle Dark participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/1/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 12:42am, James V. West wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary


On 2002-01-01 18:48, Uncle Dark wrote:

One way to introduce setting through the back door would be to create some major NPCs, of the sort you'd find in the middle of a relationship map. This would allow you to define the nescesary backstory for them, which (naturally) establishes something of the setting. Then give write-ups to the Players as "example characters."

The advantage this has over presenting a ready-made setting on its own is that it demonstrates how setting elements are attatched to characters, and not the other way around. It shows them what you mean when you say that they will be co-creating the setting through their characters. It fulfills one function of a premade setting -- giving players common points of reference to attatch to -- without making the setting primary in their minds.

Lon


Yeah, this is a great idea, Lon. I had considered something like this but wasn't certain about it. Now that you mention it, it deserves more attention. The pulp stories that inspired me to do this game are really all about character so it makes sense to let the game's full thrust be on characters and not on places.

High Fantasy puts a big price tag on places. Everything is important because it connects to the whole of the land in some way. S&S really doesn't go that route at all. Elric tales really aren't about Melnibone or the Young Kingdoms, they're about Elric.

Thanks for sparking some thought.

Message 1121#10539

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 1:08am, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Hey James,

We should talk. Inspired by Ron's Sorcerer & Sword, and what little I've heard about Bloodlust, I've begun working on my own S&S project. I don't want to curse myself by saying too much, but in short, the few constant elements of the setting are conveyed primarily through the personalities the PCs interact with.

I'm excited to see your take on the subject. Now if only Jared's pulp sorcery plug-in for octaNe were available...

:smile:

- Moose

Message 1121#10540

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 3:11pm, Paganini wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Hehe... great minds think alike. Or maybe just redundant ones. :smile: Cornerstone is supposed to be generic, but the setting I was planning on releasing with it was going to be hyperborean / hyborean in nature.

James, maybe you could give a little bit to both devils. :smile: Present your game as a genre system, and then present your setting as an example of how to draw together all of the elements and techniques you mention.


Message 1121#10554

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Paganini
...in which Paganini participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 4:21pm, Cynthia Celeste Miller wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

The advantage this has over presenting a ready-made setting on its own is that it demonstrates how setting elements are attatched to characters, and not the other way around. It shows them what you mean when you say that they will be co-creating the setting through their characters. It fulfills one function of a premade setting -- giving players common points of reference to attatch to -- without making the setting primary in their minds.

This approach worked for Champions. Until the mid-90's (I believe), there was no "Champions Universe" to speak of. Sure, there was one, by default, but only because many of their NPC's had criss-crossing backgrounds that tied them to one another.

So, while these characters co-existed in the same universe, that universe wasn't really set in stone.

Another way to handle this might be to create a specific world, but only give a certain amount of detail to it. Maintain the mystery and wonder of the setting by only telling the readers about the stuff that truly defines what your theme is (in this case, "man versus magic").

This would allow you to easily cement the theme into the reader's mind without spoiling the previously mentioned wonder of the world.

Just my thoughts.





Message 1121#10557

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Cynthia Celeste Miller
...in which Cynthia Celeste Miller participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 4:56pm, Matt Snyder wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Lon, James & everyone


The advantage this has over presenting a ready-made setting on its own is that it demonstrates how setting elements are attatched to characters, and not the other way around. It shows them what you mean when you say that they will be co-creating the setting through their characters. It fulfills one function of a premade setting -- giving players common points of reference to attatch to -- without making the setting primary in their minds.


This is EXACTLY the issue I've been exploring with my own players. I'm constantly tinkering w/ world building ideas, and I've come to the realization that the process needs contributions from my fellow players. When I suggested to them that we start anew to create a new world, new campaign, etc., they mostly said they didn't know where to begin or even how to create a setting. Then one (my brother, in fact) said he would start the only way he knew how -- by creating a character.

Of course, he was dead on. This is perhaps the best way they can contribute to world-building -- by creating compelling characters, then coloring the world details around that. I as GM, meanwhile, can create my own "characters" and generally act as the glue that binds their concepts together.

We're still pretty damned early in this process, but so far it's changed the way I approach building a setting. This is far less daunting, and more fun.

I believe James (perhaps someone else?) said that Elric stories arent about the Young Kingdoms, they're about Elric. EXACTLY the same conclusion I came to when starting my groups new world idea. I was looking at the Elric! rulebook to craft the system (trying a house version of BRP this time around), so Elric stories have been an influence in this process. Of course, since I'm an Elric nut anyway, this ain't so bad!

Anyway, James (and you, too, Moose!), I'd love to hear what you're up to for a S&S system. Sounds really cool, and right up my alley.

Matt
matt@chimera.info

[ This Message was edited by: chimera on 2002-01-02 11:56 ]

Message 1121#10558

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Matt Snyder
...in which Matt Snyder participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/2/2002 at 6:00pm, Laurel wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

** is the little red devil **

Go for the setting. Take those elements of Conan et al that appealed to you in the first place and make a setting that helps refine the mechanics. Leave the borders and the details vague so that there's plenty of options open for GMs to make their own towns and adventures, but give them something to work with- a canvas and jars of paint :smile:

Message 1121#10567

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Laurel
...in which Laurel participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/2/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 2:34am, James V. West wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Everybody is giving me terrific food for thought and I appreciate it.

I think it was Cynthia who mentioned that there was no Champions Universe at first. This hits on the core idea of what I've been wanting to do for a long time.

In the old days (so to speak), there were tomes of monsters and gods and what not. I spent more nights flipping through the Legends and Lore ADnD book than I can remember. The magic of it was that there were characters and some of them tied together directly, and some didn't. But there was no map or concrete setting. They could play in your mind and you could tinker with them all you wanted without feeling bound to anything.

I believe this is an innocent effect. I don't think anyone actully planned it that way, but this is probably the most natural way of going about it.

So what I've been kicking around in my head is Iron Devils as a kind of "cookbook" for S&S roleplaying. Basically, it would consist of intro/expository material about the genre, the rules for chargen and play, and a big encyclopedia-style list of all the elements that might be called "setting". Characters, demons, gods, artifacts or items, ideas, specific places (not countries, but tombs or castles or whatever) all loosely connected by relationship strings of varying thickness (so to speak).

Players could just browse the book and use the things they like if and when the inspiration strikes--which is exactly what I did with virtually every rpg I ever owned.

Pretty simple and straighforward, really. The way I like it.

Message 1121#10589

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 2:45am, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Heh.

What James describes is exactly the approach I'm taking with WYRD. After months of deliberating on how to present the setting, I decided a few weeks ago to take the simplest possible route. That means encyclopedic entries for every significant person, place, and thing within the myths and epics, but without strict adherence to geography or chronology. I mean, where the hell is Jotunheim in relation to Sweden or Denmark anyway? Who exactly were the Geats? You get the picture.

Anyway, I think it's a great idea.

- Moose

Message 1121#10591

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 10:45am, Uncle Dark wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Moose,

Jotuinheim was in the east. Niflheim was north, Muspielhiem was south, Vanaheim was east.

The Geats were a Germanic tribe.

Next? :smile:

Lon

Message 1121#10596

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Uncle Dark
...in which Uncle Dark participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 5:51pm, Bankuei wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

I'm glad I hit this thread...I've been delving deep trying to put together background for my Persona system, but I think this idea of using elements or entries to as ingredients the players can mix as they see fit being a great idea...It seems so obvious now. I guess sometimes we need to look at the old stuff(D&D) and see exactly what DID work, since it must have worked real well to get as popular as it did.

Chris

Message 1121#10607

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Bankuei
...in which Bankuei participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 6:41pm, Blake Hutchins wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

To be even more precise, the Geats were a tribe located in what is now southern Sweden. In Swedish, they're called Gotas, with an umlaut over the "o" denoting a soft "y" sound for the "g," such that you pronounce it "Yu-ta." Again in Swedish, using the same umlaut-driven pronounciation, southern Sweden is called Gotaland, and the city of Gothenburg is called Goteborg. The water Beowulf sailed across to get to Hrothgar's hall was the strait between Sweden and Denmark.

Interesting etymology there, I think.

Best,

Blake

Message 1121#10613

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Blake Hutchins
...in which Blake Hutchins participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 7:00pm, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Blake, Lon,

Not to make this a discussion about Beowulf and WYRD, but yeah, the exact nature of the Geats is pretty important when you consider the emotional content of the source material. The Geats relationship with the Swedes is pretty important to the overall understanding of Beowulf, as is the relationship these people had to their leaders. Come to think of it, it was probably a bad example to use in this thread, as the Geats and their story are very much rooted to a specific time and place. My bad.

But Lon's comments about the mythological realms of Scandinavia work well for me. Supposedly they were connected to the mortal realm of Midgard, but giving them vague associations with compass points leaves the interpretation wide open.

Now, can someone tell me where Yggsdrasil is located?

- Moose

Message 1121#10616

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 7:16pm, Uncle Dark wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Moose,

Yggdrasil was located in the middle of everything. Picture the nine worlds as five disks on a pole, with Hel at the base, Svartalfheim next up, then Midgard, then Lojsalfheim, then Asgard. Midgard includes Earth, Niflheim, Mussplheim, Jotunheim, and Vanaheim. The central pole is Yggdrasil.

Now back to your regularly scheduled topic...

Lon

Message 1121#10617

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Uncle Dark
...in which Uncle Dark participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 7:22pm, Paul Czege wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

I think we need a Forge mock election. I vote for Lon as "Most Likely to be Pagan".

Message 1121#10618

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Paul Czege
...in which Paul Czege participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 7:31pm, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Heh. I'd vote for him.

Yeah, Yggsdrasil runs through everything, and there's the dragon gnawing at the roots trying to get to the raven and all that, but how do I find it if I'm some cocksure Frisian looking to thwart the minions of Hel in Niflheim and to stop the giants from building the Ship of Nails?

Don't answer that. It's actually the scenario I'm planning on writing for inclusion in the game.

- Moose

[ This Message was edited by: hardcoremoose on 2002-01-03 14:32 ]

Message 1121#10619

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/3/2002 at 10:07pm, James V. West wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Well, Moose, great minds think alike.

Thanks for all the feedback and the crash-course in Geatology.

I hope to post some more concrete stuff about Iron Devils soon.


Message 1121#10628

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/3/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 12:33am, greyorm wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary


Picture the nine worlds as five disks on a pole, with Hel at the base, Svartalfheim next up, then Midgard, then Lojsalfheim, then Asgard. Midgard includes Earth, Niflheim, Mussplheim, Jotunheim, and Vanaheim. The central pole is Yggdrasil.


Hrm, odd, we learned different layouts for the cosmology of the nine worlds...in some cases there are conflicting sources. Frex, Hel and Niflheim are sometimes considered the same place, or that Hel exists somewhere within Niflheim (note that *I wouldn't necessarily agree with this placement...but then again, I haven't exactly sat on Hlidskjalf and looked out across the worlds (not that I remember, at any rate!)).

Also, the way to Hel was sometimes considered to lie through Jotunheim...meaning that Jotunheim and Niflheim were thus linked.
Thematically, that's particularly interesting, since it means the way to Hel is through giant territory...and Hel was reserved for cowards, evildoers and weaklings. Giants can be best thought of as purely destructive, chaotic forces...so if you act like the giants, you're bound for Hel.

As well, the giants of Jotunheim were Jotun, not Thursir, important to note since the Jotun were wise, ancient beings, yet opposed to the Gods and hostile to them. Mimir was a Jotun. However, the dividing line between the two giant types is not very clear, and they may be the same.

Additionally, the way I was originally taught the layout of the Great Ash was with Muspelheim, Vanaheim and Lojsalfheim above Midgaard (Asgard above these), with Niflheim, Jotunheim and Svartalfheim below it (Hel below these).

Another interesting fact about Yggdrasil is that it was also called 'Odin's Steed.'

Anyways, more fodder for Wyrd, perhaps.

Message 1121#10632

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by greyorm
...in which greyorm participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 2:16am, Uncle Dark wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Raven and I may need to share a title...

Lon

Message 1121#10637

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Uncle Dark
...in which Uncle Dark participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 2:22am, Jared A. Sorensen wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Gentlemen, let's see those goatees and pewter dragon claw pendants, if you please.

Just saw Snatch. Dang! It was cool.

Message 1121#10638

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jared A. Sorensen
...in which Jared A. Sorensen participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 4:43am, hardcoremoose wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

Sheesh, maybe I should start another WYRD thread somewhere where everyone can post their useless knowledge about Scandinavian myth. I'm learning a few things here. :smile:

And Jared, Snatch was pretty cool. It was one of my favorite films of this past year...can't understand why it's ending up on people's "worst of" lists. Sigh.

- Moose

[ This Message was edited by: hardcoremoose on 2002-01-03 23:44 ]

Message 1121#10641

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by hardcoremoose
...in which hardcoremoose participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002




On 1/4/2002 at 9:23pm, James V. West wrote:
RE: The Iron Devils Quandary

I loved Snatch. Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels was great too. Not sure which was better.

But *ahem*, back to the original topic...

Oh hell, I'll just start a new thread. :smile:

Message 1121#10696

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by James V. West
...in which James V. West participated
...in Indie Game Design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 1/4/2002