I have encountered a lot of resistance (even more than I expected) to Trollbabe because of the name. Everyone I hand it to looks at me funny. "Ignore the name. It's good, really."

It's really the only barrier to getting people to play it that I've encountered.

Ron, what other titles did you consider and discard when making this game, and why?

Vaxalon, I think you'll find that the name is one of the main points in the design. Ron designed the game precisely because of reactions like those you've encountered.

From where I'm sitting, telling your pals to "ignore the name" is tantamount to saying, "Aw, forget a huge part of what the game's really about and what it's for."

What the game is really about, as far as I can discern, can be found here: Trollbabe, feminism, and the chain mail bikini

It certainly explains Ron's ambitions far better than I could, and maybe more explicitly than Ron generally does.

Hi Vax,

I didn't consider a single other title. Trollbabe was and is perfect.

Bear in mind that I have kind of a funny take on things like "how can I get people to play this game."

Given your inquiry, I'll explain a bit about where I'm coming from as a designer. I'm not especially interested in appealing to the broadest number of people - I'm interested in nailing something specific for those who tune into that exact thing.

In the case of Trollbabe, that thing is best understood as underground, or perhaps countercultural, especially in reference to women's choices in life, sexuality, and to a lesser degree violence. It begins with images and words that in most cases are connected with points and themes that are used toward abusive (in this case, sexist-marginalizing) goals in our culture.

The immediate reaction to something like that is often reflexive, pushing it away or expressing disapproval for some kind of detail. The people you're talking to very likely understand already that there is no possible way that the words of a game's title can possibly affect how good or bad the experience of play is. Therefore, and in my experience, such reactions cover the fact that the people would very much like to see these images/words utilized to more positive ends, but have no faith that it can happen.

Trollbabe is visually, textually, and experientially designed to bring that desire into the light and to pay off tremendously.

To attract people to Trollbabe, the best thing to do is leave it lying out (perhaps with a color-printed cover) and let people respond to it, not to you suggesting it as a game.

Them: "What is this? Trollbabe?

You: "Mmn, yeah. Great game." (turn away, do other stuff, display no interest in whether they are looking at it)

The illustrations and a lot of the singled-out text, visually speaking, are designed to grab them - yes, those exact people - on their own. They work well to that end in the current version, and my plan for the eventual hard copy is to maximize this effect to a very extreme degree.

If you do hand it to someone, and they react to the name, your best bet is to ignore that completely. Don't even say "Ignore the name" - by doing that, you are already confirming that the book's title is a "bad thing" and by extension representing its contents. Yes, even if you say "Ignore it," the message is actually the opposite. You're also apologizing for something that needs no apologies.

Best,
Ron

For the interested student, compare and contrast Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

To my mind, quite similar approaches: titles that sound, well, ick, but do exactly what the title says with much goodness & kickness of posteriors.

Everyone that I have shown the game to, who hasn't seen it before, has had a negative reaction to the name, to the point of not being interested in reading further, of not wanting to listen to my explanations of what the game is about.

How is that a good thing?

I've read "Trollbabe, feminism, and the chain mail bikini" and it doesn't address my point.

I understand what Trollbabe is all about, and it doesn't address my point.

WRT Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Trollbabe doesn't have the WB's marketing department behind it to redefine the image.

The people you're talking to very likely understand already that there is no possible way that the words of a game's title can possibly affect how good or bad the experience of play is.

To attract people to Trollbabe, the best thing to do is leave it lying out (perhaps with a color-printed cover) and let people respond to it, not to you suggesting it as a game.

I'm not especially interested in appealing to the broadest number of people - I'm interested in nailing something specific for those who tune into that exact thing.

Vaxalon wrote: Maybe this is the essence of my problem; the people I game with don't grok it, and as a result, the game would never click with them anyways...Sucks to be me, I guess.

I really don't think you understand just how limited my ability to get out of the house really is.

Hi Vax,

You've effectively explained why nothing and no one can help you. My only possible answer to your concern as a customer is "Thanks for buying the game, have a nice day."

Best,
Ron

Like I said, sucks to be me.

Just a quicky from me... WB marketing has little or nothing to do with it.

As an "early adopter" of Buffy, the initial reaction to the title, and concept, was "holy cow, something with that name can only be so lame as to be worth watching for sneering mockery points."

As I got drawn in, it dawned on me that my problems with it at the early stage were just that: my problems with it. That a series with a preppy californian blonde called buffy fighting the forces of darkness could only suck was just plain wrong, and taught me a lot about some of my more "socially acceptable" prejudices.

Hence Trollbabe. Has to suck, right?

When folk dissed Buffy on the name / concept after I'd got into it, I'd just shrug and say "You're missing a great show. Your loss." If you want folks to get interested in Trollbabe, leave it out, and if they diss it based on the cover, shrug and say "Great game, your loss."

It's not like you're leaving kill puppies for satan out or anything...

Of course, you could just tell your players your running it for them...

I think your fear of repercussions is making this more difficult for you then it needs to be. Seems pretty simple to me. All you need to do is say:

"Saturday's gaming day. If you come over on Saturday we will be playing Trollbabe. I think its a fantastic game I really want to try and share with you. If you don't wish to play Trollbabe, then don't bother coming over"

Then you simply play with whoever shows up.

If no one shows up, then you've learned a really good lesson about the sorts of friends you've been gaming with.

Seems win-win to me.

The social contract in my gaming group isn't that authoritarian. What we play is a matter of consensus; people propose different ideas for what to play, and whatever generates the most interest is what gets played.

First of all, my wife is part of the group. I can't tell her not to bother coming over, because she's already here.

Folks, it's clear that Vaxalon is not asking, "How can I get people to play Trollbabe," but rather, "No one will play Trollbabe with me and I can't play with anyone else."

There is nothing we can do about that. It has nothing to do with the title (no, Vax, it doesn't). It has also, apparently, absolutely intractable to any kind of suggestion. It is literally not a topic for discussion - Vaxalon is making it perfectly clear that there's nothing to discuss.

Best,
Ron

That's what it morphed into as time went on. My initial question was about how the name was chosen; that was answered very emphatically in the first responses.

This may be off-topic, but I'd greatly encourage you to choose a setting-less narrativist game like Univeralis to sell to people who get finnicky about details if you're unable to get better players.