The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: [DitV] Stupidly detail-picky fallout question
Started by: Doyce
Started on: 9/19/2004
Board: lumpley games


On 9/19/2004 at 6:18am, Doyce wrote:
[DitV] Stupidly detail-picky fallout question

Preface: got the book -- friggin' love the book. Color tone of following questions with that knowledge.

---

K, in both the short- and long-term fallout lists, the first choice given is:

- Subtract 1 from one of your character's Stats.

Lovely. Peachy. One what?

I would, of course, assume "1d", except that a few lines down, we read "Subtract 1d from an existing d6+ trait or relationship", and I think "WHY did he bother to say 1d there, but not 1d up above? Why is the wording different?" The only reason I can think of is that the first one means "one something-else."

(And, come to that, why "subtract 1d from an existing d6+ trait"? Couldn't a 2d4 Trait be dropped to 1d4? What's the purpose of that restriction? I ask for better understanding.)

Message 12782#136661

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Doyce
...in which Doyce participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/19/2004




On 9/19/2004 at 12:18pm, lumpley wrote:
RE: [DitV] Stupidly detail-picky fallout question

1) 1 die is right. Why didn't I say 1 die? Dunno. Stat vs. Skill thinking, let's blame.

2) "Bad" Fallout lets you add d4s, not subtract 'em.

I'm glad you got - and like - the book!

-Vincent

Message 12782#136669

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/19/2004




On 9/19/2004 at 3:40pm, Doyce wrote:
RE: [DitV] Stupidly detail-picky fallout question

1) So, just to test my understanding: those two choices under bad Fallout could actually be one single option on the list that reads: "Subtract 1d from one of your character's Stats, d6+ Traits, or d6+ Relationships."

Which, granted, is an uglier sentence, but essentially correct?

2) Duh. Obviously, when you say it like that. d4's = complications, so of course bad follow-out = more complications, not less.


And... liked it? First thing I read from the book wasn't even in it, it was in those reference sheets: "Roll dice or say yes." Jumped out at me like a mugger. Things just got more interesting from there.

Message 12782#136680

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Doyce
...in which Doyce participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/19/2004




On 9/19/2004 at 4:24pm, lumpley wrote:
RE: [DitV] Stupidly detail-picky fallout question

Exactly. You have it.

-Vincent

Message 12782#136685

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/19/2004