The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Forum re-ordering
Started by: Clinton R. Nixon
Started on: 10/1/2004
Board: Site Discussion

On 10/1/2004 at 3:38pm, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
Forum re-ordering

You've probably already noticed that we've re-ordered the main forums on the front page. Actual Play, as befits it, is now first, followed by Indie Game Design and Publishing. Ron and I decided to do this in order to show what the Forge emphasizes: actual play and design.

Message 12919#138150

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/1/2004 at 5:01pm, ffilz wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

Nice setup. I was about to ask if that was the reason for the re-ordering.

Frank

Message 12919#138163

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ffilz
...in which ffilz participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/1/2004 at 5:05pm, Andy Kitkowski wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

Yeah, I saw it and I immediately thought "Awesome". Nice job on this.

-Andy

Message 12919#138166

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Andy Kitkowski
...in which Andy Kitkowski participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/1/2004 at 9:52pm, Andrew Martin wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

Very obvious and clear now.
Good job, Clinton and Ron!

Message 12919#138209

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Andrew Martin
...in which Andrew Martin participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/1/2004 at 10:19pm, Jasper wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

I smiled when I saw this, 'cause Ron's always talking about how Actual Play is really -- or should be -- the heart of the Forge. Nice to see it reflected in the layout. I hope it says something to new people (I hope it says something to everyone, but I suspect they're the ones who it will affect).

Message 12919#138214

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jasper
...in which Jasper participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/1/2004 at 10:43pm, LordSmerf wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

I was actually somewhat curious: did you find it fairly obvious what order to put things in? I am sure that Actual Play at the top went in without debate, but i was wondering if there was discussion on the location of (say) Connections and Conventions...

Thomas

Message 12919#138216

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by LordSmerf
...in which LordSmerf participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/1/2004


On 10/4/2004 at 5:12pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

Hiya,

Nah, we didn't talk much about the order of the other stuff; I figured Clinton's judgment is probably better than mine about that. All I wanted was to get Actual Play at the top and to have the others rearranged in some fashion. Besides, if I'm not mistaken, the whole idea was Clinton's anyway.

Best,
Ron

Message 12919#138447

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/4/2004


On 10/4/2004 at 10:01pm, Eric J. wrote:
RE: Forum re-ordering

I'm upside down.

8|

|8

I'll get used to it.

May the wind be always at your back,
-Pyron

Message 12919#138482

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Eric J.
...in which Eric J. participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/4/2004