The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: collaborative creation
Started by: Matt Wilson
Started on: 8/9/2005
Board: Stranger Things Playtest Forum


On 8/9/2005 at 4:53pm, Matt Wilson wrote:
collaborative creation

Over in Actual Play, Wilhelm said:

After everybody arrived and we navigated through the usual social chat, John handed us some character sheets and said "you should make some characters". And it was dead silence as people started scratching away. This despite the fact that John had explicitly written in the game text "generate characters collaboratively".


So my quick suggestion to combat this is not to hand out the actual sheets until there's been some talking.

Message 16322#173570

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Matt Wilson
...in which Matt Wilson participated
...in Stranger Things Playtest Forum
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/9/2005




On 8/9/2005 at 5:28pm, John Harper wrote:
Re: collaborative creation

Yes, I should have lead the discussion of characters before the actual writing-stuff-down part. That's definitely going into the Director techniques section. I also admit that I was curious to see what would happen if I just passed out the sheets and stayed quiet. Fortunately, Wilhelm took the lead and got everyone talking.

Message 16322#173579

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by John Harper
...in which John Harper participated
...in Stranger Things Playtest Forum
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/9/2005




On 8/9/2005 at 10:23pm, philaros wrote:
RE: Re: collaborative creation

On the one hand, I already knew exactly what character I was going to play, so I didn't feel like I had anything to discuss beyond telling the others about my character, which I'd do after writing him down on the sheet. On the other hand, if we'd discussed character ideas more extensively beforehand, I might've had some specific motivations or goals in mind when we started playing, which would've helped engage my character in the story more. On the third hand, it was useful for playtest purposes to have a character with no particular goals or motivations to see what happens.

Message 16322#173628

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by philaros
...in which philaros participated
...in Stranger Things Playtest Forum
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/9/2005




On 8/9/2005 at 10:48pm, John Harper wrote:
RE: Re: collaborative creation

Quite so, Phil.

And it turned out that "what happens" is, you pile up a ton of story material for session two. Your character is at the heart of the action now, with all kinds of juicy directions to go. How badly does he want to be a human? Will he serve the Witch no matter what? I can't wait to find out.

Message 16322#173631

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by John Harper
...in which John Harper participated
...in Stranger Things Playtest Forum
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/9/2005




On 8/10/2005 at 6:15pm, John Harper wrote:
RE: Re: collaborative creation

philaros wrote: On the third hand, it was useful for playtest purposes to have a character with no particular goals or motivations to see what happens.


I also wanted to mention that this has spawned a new sidebar in the game. It contains advice for players which basically says, "Give your character a goal (no matter how small or short-term) or you will probably be bored." So, yes, it was ultimately useful as a playtesting strategy.

Message 16322#173709

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by John Harper
...in which John Harper participated
...in Stranger Things Playtest Forum
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/10/2005