The previous thread was closed before I read it and could comment. As I understand the process, here, I have started a new thread. This may be especially apt, as my point is tangential.

Ron wrote:
Despite our differences in style and hot-buttons, I am seeing a crucial consensus among Ralph, Luke, Clinton, Keith, me, and others. It is:

Given POD printing and internet ordering, as well as useful fulfilment houses, there is no reason for further centralization of any step of the current model.

Which means tossing POD into the hands of a single distributor is no "solution" - because there's no current problem, at least not for us, nor for anyone who wants to do what we do.

(snip)

The "solution" is nothing but a barrel of unnecessary and disastrous problems, the more so because no actual problem exists. Printing has never been easier, nor capable of such great-looking product for so little money. What I see in your "solution," Sean, is that distributors are desperate to make themselves relevant in some way, now that they've effectively become obsolete. So, they have a problem. Not us.

Hey Chad,

You got a good point, but it is being answered to a certain extent.  I know over at IPR we have begun selling directly to retailers and that seems to be pretty successful so far.  A lot of the publishers there are hawking POD products.  Also, it bypasses the distributor and consolidates a whole bunch of publishers into one area for ordering purposes.  For myself it makes me less money if someone buys from me online, but it is still profitable and it gets the game into the hands of people that fall into those criteria you mentioned, making it worthwhile.

Keith

Brennan's nailed it.

Since distribution is unreliable, exactly as Ryan described in the parent thread, it typically fails even to meet the needs you've stated. Chad, you rightly point out that we can't rely on a "would" statement from people, as in they "would have" bought the game from the store, as if it were rock solid. But I do agree that they might be real needs, at least to a small extent, for a few people, I completely agree that having my books in stores which (a) can stock them reliably and (b) re-order them once sold is a fine thing, although as I've stated, not a make-or-break issue.

Basically, I like to cut retailers inclined to do (b) into the existing functional publisher/customer loop. At the moment, both IPR and Key 20 are doing a good job at getting them the (a) they need. Oddly enough, these also tend to be the retailers who don't mind a little extra step in ordering, as long as it pays off, who do monitor what their customers actually like rather than merely brainwashing them, and who pay attention to the attractive look & feel of their store rather than being Weird Bob's Grognard Retreat. So it's a win-win when it happens.

But there's no traditional distributor in that picture. Looks right, looks left, looks under chair ... nope, not there.

Best,
Ron

Bob wrote:
You got a good point, but it is being answered to a certain extent.  I know over at IPR we have begun selling directly to retailers and that seems to be pretty successful so far.  A lot of the publishers there are hawking POD products.  Also, it bypasses the distributor and consolidates a whole bunch of publishers into one area for ordering purposes.

Ron wrote:
Since distribution is unreliable, exactly as Ryan described in the parent thread, it typically fails even to meet the needs you've stated. Chad, you rightly point out that we can't rely on a "would" statement from people, as in they "would have" bought the game from the store, as if it were rock solid. But I do agree that they might be real needs, at least to a small extent, for a few people, I completely agree that having my books in stores which (a) can stock them reliably and (b) re-order them once sold is a fine thing, although as I've stated, not a make-or-break issue.

Ron wrote:
But there's no traditional distributor in that picture. Looks right, looks left, looks under chair ... nope, not there.

H'm. I guess I'm not seeing the same opening/window you are, or maybe we're not communicating well ...

As I see it, the retailers who refuse to consider anything but looking in GCQ or their single distributor's order-list are the same ones who would not benefit us, or any publisher really, through ordering. They order what their weird little rumor-community considers hot at the moment, plus slush-piles with a little extra cash once in a while, and do not re-order specific titles from those slush-piles based on sales. This is not hearsay or speculation on my part. These guys brag about this.

So I see zero return in expanding store-presence beyond those retailers who do the (a-b) I described before. Those guys are serving their customers and me; the other guys are not, so any effort to get into those stores is wasted. A sale through such a store isn't worth much because it's not followed by an immediate, reliable re-order.

Chad, it seems to me that you're advocating making that extra effort which I am saying isn't worth it. All for the benefit of what seems to me very iffy, very few, very low-return, unsustained sales.

If a guy comes up and says, "I woulda bought your game, but it wasn't in my store," and flatly resists any and all other avenues, it seems to me he doesn't really want my game, and the "woulda" is highly dubious from the start. That's the iffy. Your "two dozen per title" is a very low number in terms of sales, definitely under the radar for "problem to solve," as I see it, and considering I'd be making (for Sorcerer) $2-3 profit per book, also under the financial radar. What, two dozen at $2.50? I "lost" $60? And really that's no loss at all, since those same copies are about to sell on-line, to others, for a profit more like $14 per book.

I think the reliable and business-savvy store presence can be thoroughly met by that core of excellent retailers who do (a-b). It seems to me as if your primary concern would be solved simply by identifying and getting to them, either directly or through Key 20 or IPR, and that any and all concern with the "other" stores can be jettisoned with no loss.

Best,
Ron

Ron wrote:
H'm. I guess I'm not seeing the same opening/window you are, or maybe we're not communicating well ...

As I see it, the retailers who refuse to consider anything but looking in GCQ or their single distributor's order-list are the same ones who would not benefit us, or any publisher really, through ordering. They order what their weird little rumor-community considers hot at the moment, plus slush-piles with a little extra cash once in a while, and do not re-order specific titles from those slush-piles based on sales. This is not hearsay or speculation on my part. These guys brag about this.

So I see zero return in expanding store-presence beyond those retailers who do the (a-b) I described before. Those guys are serving their customers and me; the other guys are not, so any effort to get into those stores is wasted. A sale through such a store isn't worth much because it's not followed by an immediate, reliable re-order.

Chad, it seems to me that you're advocating making that extra effort which I am saying isn't worth it. All for the benefit of what seems to me very iffy, very few, very low-return, unsustained sales.

chadu wrote:
Would you agree in that light that there is some mild value in the distro system?

Chad, I bought Dead Inside from a retailer, but I bought it because of your name on it (having read a lot of GURPS stuff) and even at that point, several years ago and before I found The Forge, I was looking for independent RPGs (just like I look for other indie media). So my reasons to buy were probably fairly unusual.

Anyway, I'm eagerly reading along with this thread and not taking sides until I've thought about it a lot.

Sorry, I wanted to explain this point better:

me wrote: "The reason that Ron is reluctant to get involved is because, to affect lasting change, and to not simply throw thimbles of water on a maddening fire, you can't simply shuffle your products into standard distro yourself (even if you find an easy way to shuffle your products into the standard distro system)."

chadu wrote:
If anything, I'm advocating making a mild effort (once systems/processes come online to make this much more trivial, like IPR and the RPGNow distro entry) for marketing purposes -- game on shelves, game in minds. Serving those cloistered customers and retailers is a side-effect.

If the system or process doesn't cost me money -- or better yet earns me something -- it's a better deal than buying advertising space somewhere, strictly in terms of a marketing effort.

Chad,

What's the harm in printing up a 100 or so of your books and slipping them into distro to see what happens? Distributers don't order more than a couple of dozen of small press stuff, so there's no danger of needing to print more or of having back stock. Distribution can be an excellent advertising opportunity -- especially since you stand to make money doing it.

As Andy said, those "G" kids are out there. They are pining over the barren shelves of their local game store. They are looking for your game even if they don't know it.

Personally, I have a great one on one relationship with three retailers in my area -- one down the street, two within 200 miles of my house. Yes, 200. One orders directly from me. That's fun. One orders direct from my fulfillment house. That's cool. And one orders my stuff via Alliance. Which is fine by me. There are two extremely beneficial sides to this: first, they expose kids to BW who otherwise would have never heard of it. And, they keep reordering -- which makes getting into retailers and selling at a discount 100% worth it. My game continues to grow via their efforts! And using them as a test case, I feel it's perfectly acceptable to deal with the hassle of distro.

-L

I'm squinting a little. How did I get cast into the role of the "no store ever ever" guy? I'm the one saying get into the stores, for exactly the reason you're saying, Chad. But I'm also saying, pick and choose which stores, and never mind the ones who aren't going to make good on their side of the deal. Which also includes most distributors.

It's getting frustrating to talk about this, because I personally represented all the independent games, as a principle and unique community, at the GTS in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The reason our games are in some stores, consistently and well, is because I did that. That's how Pandemonium in Cambridge, MA, even knows we exist, Luke. That's how IPR and Key 20 are able to do what they do at all, relative to stores, because I spent three years representing and following up and emailing, as well as participating in the "industry" lists and forums. You guys don't know much about that. I paved that road.

Incidentally, there are actually a couple of good-guy distributors out there. They are smaller, fairly regional, and treated like poor relations by most stores. And since their model of success is "become like Alliance one day," they tend to make decisions that break my heart, as they drive their real success into the ground, rather than help themselves or me. But I do want to acknowledge them a little.

Chad, the more I read over this thread, the more it seems to me as if you didn't really know what IPR and Key 20 are doing. That's not a slam; I'm trying to show you a whole world of opportunity, for direct sales as well as store sales. I think if you follow up on their sites and email them, Brennan and Jason, respectively, will be happy to tell you how their companies work. You can be in the stores, and not at random, either, but with reliable expectations of sales.

Best,
Ron

Hello again,

OK, I think I'm seeing it. I've already expanded into the retailer zone that you are talking about expanding into. So when I say "no more expansion necessary," that doesn't work for you because you are looking into the zone I'm in, and saying, hey, that could work.

Yes, it works. I really want to help you expand into the functional retailer zone you're speculating about, because I know it's real - I'm in it.

But expanding past that, way out there, into non-functional retailer zone, is a bad idea. I'm trying to help you see the difference between the two and see how you can step into the zone that works.

Best,
Ron

I don't know any of the inside info at IPR and I would hope some would share it... but at RPGMall we found out point blank that retailers would NOT buy from us unless pricing was near 50% off and low or free shipping costs. IPR offers 42%... that's about what RPGMall was offering and we got a grand total of about 4 retailers to signup.

I also found out that it would require SERIOUS sales force effort to call all the retailers to get them to even try the system. They all wanted to work with their main distributors and don't want the hassle of dealing with another account. They point blank said it's not worth their bother when many of these game stores admit to activly supporting indie publishers when they can.

In short, if IPR is actaully reaching any significant number of retailers (50+) then I'd be extreamly surprised.

However, if you enter distribution you reach over several thousand retailers though their solicitation publications and of them probably a hundred or so would actually order your book. Many of which do NOT use the internet at all or have any clue about IPR or your indie websites (nor, if they are decent store owners, have to time to do so).

I own a store. I do what I can to support the indie press. We had a section/shelf in the store full of it. We maybe sold one book a month from there and eventually it got taken down. Just not a wise use of space we pay rent on. I'm sure many retailers (esp these days) are also very cautious of what they stock and take much less risks.

Now, what RPGNow is doing is an attempt to tackle many of these problems while serving all those gamers out there that want a book in their hands TODAY and wish to support their FLGS. We are:

1) working on consignment with our distrubotrs (4 to start that cover 80+% of the nation). This has several advantages. The main one is that you're not subject to some distributor's buyer being caution on ordering your product and never reordering in time to meet demand. You product is ALWAYS in stock at the distros and we make sure they keep getting enough to put on their floor. We use POD methods so there is no secondary warehousing involved. So a store tries your product, surprising to him someone bought it a week later. What would typically happen at this point is he'd call his distro and try to order another - finding out that they are out of stock (or worse told it's out of print which is usually a lazy lie). But with our system, they get the book and we just print another. Steve Jackson Games and several others use this method. Unlike key20 which behaves like a typical fulfillment house with spotty restocking orders (not fault of theirs).

2) We get paid bi-monthly so you get your payments on time. Many distros have gone 90+days on debt and or put you on the bottom of the list to get paid. Why not. Well we're a larger company and doing fullfilment on consignment, so they have to deal with us differently. We get the FASTEST payment process they have. Unlike key20 again which is paid 60 days out usually.

3) We are only selling _PROVEN_ products. We are promoting this fact through solicitation and attendence at GTS and conventions. We'll also be putting out demo CD's and contacting our 80,000 or so customer base with RPGNow and RPGShop to get them to order. When a retailer sees our rather familiar name and the fact that all products going to distro have already proven themselves as top sellers, they will be much more likely to order a print product from us.

4) We make it easy on the publishers. We handle the POD and shipping to distros and solicitation and simply send them checks. Allowing you to do what you do best which is make games not hassle over unpaid bills or missing shippments.

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is come early spring we should start seeing if this is all enough to make some strides into the "old" distribution system in a new way. This new way should create more customers, sell more product, and make you some money - that you are very likely just missing out of at this point (eg new customers).

James Mathe
http://www.RPGNow.com
P.S. Sorry if this sounds like an ad. I just think that way all the time.

>>The problem is that, with all this talk of making more money by ignoring trad distro, we essentially cut C and G out of the equasion for most game stores. Which is, of course, a little saddening.  Pardon the metaphor, but it's kinda like saying, "Hey, here's your (gaming) salvation, you just have to tirelessly hunt for it (on the internet) to realize it exists."<<

I am a big supporter of the idea of getting your game out there in as many ways as possible. However, if your intent is to ru a profitable business, and an efficient one where you build upon todays progress so you have have a larger and more fiscally successful business tomarrow, you can go about trying to put your game out there "at all costs".

Some methods are just not functional. The 3 tier distribution system is a prime example of that. It is a terrible waste of money to spend so much marketing and PR effort winning stores over to the idea of stocking ad selling your products, only to have large numbers of them fail to actuallt stock the thing because the distributors have zeroed it out in their warehouse. And if your consumer marketing attempts to "support" retailers in general on the premise that most retailers could (in theory) stock and sell your games because your distributors (in theory) are out there trying to sell it to them, then all you really have done is drive a bunch of potential consumers on a wild goose chase. And after many of them have done that, you dramtically reduce the chance that they will endevour onto another one in an attempt to actually find a place where they can buy your product.

For each and ever product that distributors claim to carry, but dramtically under service, and on most products that manufacturers produce "to pre orders", with no intend to reprint and support over the long haul, and every retailer that won't go that extra mile to hunt down a source for a product the customer wants, the stability of the hobby game industry itself gets hurt. You lose sales, the retailer loses the premise of offering utility value to their consumers, and we all manage to piss off consumers who can't find what they want and are given false hope by everyone in the 3 tier channel that special orders and whatnot will still manage to service their needs. And entire industrythat fails to fill the consumers needs will soon find it has no consumers.

No. I won't support a distribution methodology that is driving the industry into the ground with very short sighted thinking. Now will I support retail stores that are so blinded by what those companies are telling them, they won't think outside of the box when it comes to trying to service their local customers' needs.

That being said, there are a number of good retailers out there and I am by no means advocating cutting them out of the system. We are working hard to identify who those stores and are making very attractive wholesale programs for them to utilize. We even offer them the same discount that we use to offer our distributors, so long as the enroll into a specific program we have set up. The net result tends to be that each retailer on the program generates invoice amounts equal to what our distributors use to order. Two or three such retailers generate more total revenue than the average distributor use to. But more, it is a RELIABLE distribution method. And that is what counts.

Oh, I also forgot making contact with the nearly 300 active stores registered with our online store locator.

http://www.rpgindustry.com/storelocator

James

abzu wrote:
What's the harm in printing up a 100 or so of your books and slipping them into distro to see what happens? Distributers don't order more than a couple of dozen of small press stuff, so there's no danger of needing to print more or of having back stock. Distribution can be an excellent advertising opportunity -- especially since you stand to make money doing it.

Ron wrote:
I'm squinting a little. How did I get cast into the role of the "no store ever ever" guy? I'm the one saying get into the stores, for exactly the reason you're saying, Chad. But I'm also saying, pick and choose which stores, and never mind the ones who aren't going to make good on their side of the deal. Which also includes most distributors.

Ron wrote: It's getting frustrating to talk about this, because I personally represented all the independent games, as a principle and unique community, at the GTS in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The reason our games are in some stores, consistently and well, is because I did that. That's how Pandemonium in Cambridge, MA, even knows we exist, Luke. That's how IPR and Key 20 are able to do what they do at all, relative to stores, because I spent three years representing and following up and emailing, as well as participating in the "industry" lists and forums. You guys don't know much about that. I paved that road.

Ron wrote: Chad, the more I read over this thread, the more it seems to me as if you didn't really know what IPR and Key 20 are doing. That's not a slam; I'm trying to show you a whole world of opportunity, for direct sales as well as store sales. I think if you follow up on their sites and email them, Brennan and Jason, respectively, will be happy to tell you how their companies work. You can be in the stores, and not at random, either, but with reliable expectations of sales.

glyphmonkey wrote:
Chad, I bought Dead Inside from a retailer,

Ron wrote:
OK, I think I'm seeing it. I've already expanded into the retailer zone that you are talking about expanding into. So when I say "no more expansion necessary," that doesn't work for you because you are looking into the zone I'm in, and saying, hey, that could work.

Ron wrote: But expanding past that, way out there, into non-functional retailer zone, is a bad idea. I'm trying to help you see the difference between the two and see how you can step into the zone that works.

chadu wrote:

glyphmonkey wrote:
Chad, I bought Dead Inside from a retailer,

Which one, by the way?

Very, very few retailers are/have stocked it, to my knowledge.

CU

There is a very big chance that the book is still in the back room - RPGMall stock is stored at the store warehouse. If you ask them to look in the RPGMall stock in the back room they'd probably find the copy and be able to sell it to you.

I'll probably be keeping a copy of each of the RPGNow distro releases in the store as well.

James
http://www.RPGNow.com/retailstore.php

Hi Chad,

I'm just wondering if the functional and non-functional zones overlap (in the distros) at all.

Ron wrote:
I'd been in the functional zone, and then the boundary shifted on me, rendering those books, in that warehouse, so much unprofitable junk. The scary part is that they already had told people they were out of stock of my books, so if it weren't for that geographic happenstance, I might never have seen those books again.

Ron wrote:
Fortunately, Chad, with IPR and Key 20 doing what they do, which is a lot like what Sphinx Group did before it focused more on music and comics, and what Tundra originally tried to do before it got strange, it's no longer necessary to saturate the distributors like I had to do just a few short years ago. You can stay a bit more within the functional zone without worrying about the edge shifting on you.

Ron wrote:
I'm squinting a little. How did I get cast into the role of the "no store ever ever" guy? I'm the one saying get into the stores, for exactly the reason you're saying, Chad. But I'm also saying, pick and choose which stores, and never mind the ones who aren't going to make good on their side of the deal. Which also includes most distributors.

It's getting frustrating to talk about this, because I personally represented all the independent games, as a principle and unique community, at the GTS in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The reason our games are in some stores, consistently and well, is because I did that. That's how Pandemonium in Cambridge, MA, even knows we exist, Luke. That's how IPR and Key 20 are able to do what they do at all, relative to stores, because I spent three years representing and following up and emailing, as well as participating in the "industry" lists and forums. You guys don't know much about that. I paved that road.

Incidentally, there are actually a couple of good-guy distributors out there. They are smaller, fairly regional, and treated like poor relations by most stores. And since their model of success is "become like Alliance one day," they tend to make decisions that break my heart, as they drive their real success into the ground, rather than help themselves or me. But I do want to acknowledge them a little.

Chad, the more I read over this thread, the more it seems to me as if you didn't really know what IPR and Key 20 are doing. That's not a slam; I'm trying to show you a whole world of opportunity, for direct sales as well as store sales. I think if you follow up on their sites and email them, Brennan and Jason, respectively, will be happy to tell you how their companies work. You can be in the stores, and not at random, either, but with reliable expectations of sales.

Best,
Ron

Hello,

You'll have to get the lowdown from Jason Valore for the official statement, but what's relevant to me is that they do not simply plead or blanket-promote to distributors - they negotiate, they stay on them, they follow up on re-ordering, and they give me the straight dope about who's buying. Key 20 has its head in the right place regarding who's the client - me.

There are some differences between IPR and Key 20 in how they deal with retailers, but again, I don't want to speak for the companies. If you contact each of them, they'll give you straight answers.

Also, in the interests of disclosure, I'm perhaps unique in using both companies, through a historical accident. IPR handles my direct on-line sales; Key 20 handles my retail orders. So I can say pretty firmly that both do an excellent job.

Best,
Ron

I know this is a tangent, but I can't help myself:

Ron wrote: They order what their weird little rumor-community considers hot at the moment, plus slush-piles with a little extra cash once in a while, and do not re-order specific titles from those slush-piles based on sales. This is not hearsay or speculation on my part. These guys brag about this.

Hi Sydney,

Based on absolutely direct experience, and absolutely clear information and observation, many retailers do indeed operate just like that.

And they don't immediately go out of business, although many of them do, like clockwork. Why do some persist?

1. Many stores do not rely on RPGs as their primary product. Many of them conduct an ongoing boardgame business, an ongoing "hobby gear" business (Matrix fans, Star Wars fans, etc), and especially during the last 10 years, an ongoing CCG business aimed at 9-12 year olds.

2. Many store-owners are dealing with a constant critical-debt problem. In those circumstances, making the nut this month takes top priority. The best way to do that is to hype up, say, the next big thing from TSR (so-called) or WoD, depending on the store's customers, and make sure they buy up whatever gets ordered big that month. To do this, the store owner cultivates a whole community of mid-teen to mid-twenties customers as a kind of personal cult. He becomes their Insider Gamer Oracle; this is, in fact, a primary skill among many hobby store owners, of many kinds.

By contrast, at that level of crisis and debt, something like Sorcerer is totally trivial. It yields a whole $8 profit per core book, and core books sell, even at the stores where it's most popular, perhaps once or twice a month. It's just not a bulk buy. To this sort of retailer, the goal of ordering the game at all is to militate against the illusion that he's enslaved to whatever TSR and WotC pump at him (whoops, forgot Warhammer miniatures - them too). A few little weirdo games up on the shelves provides the "see, I carry everything" message. If one or two of them sell, fine; if not, fine. He just orders up a couple-three of them with every ordering cycle to keep that shelf stocked.

Bear in mind that I have seen such stores, even ones which boast of being the top store in their states, go under, much to the customers' consternation. Wasn't that the best store, with the best guy? What happened? Also bear in mind that the stores which persist are often subsidized through an external business or personal inheritance - basically a big expensive place for the loser husband to hang out with his "business" while the wife's real-estate business or whatever really provides the living wage for the couple. Sound harsh? It's not speculation. I know the guy who fits this description and I know his store well.

So yeah, ouija-board capitalism. Totally. My observations at the GAMA Trade Show are perfectly described by that term.

Best,
Ron

Oh.

Still disfunctional, but now at least comprehensible. This might also explain why my local comic book store has changed ownership about three times in the last six years. (I don't think I've ever even heard of a game store in D.C.).

1. Many stores do not rely on RPGs as their primary product. Many of them conduct an ongoing boardgame business, an ongoing "hobby gear" business (Matrix fans, Star Wars fans, etc), and especially during the last 10 years, an ongoing CCG business aimed at 9-12 year old

2. Many store-owners are dealing with a constant critical-debt problem. In those circumstances, making the nut this month takes top priority. The best way to do that is to hype up, say, the next big thing from TSR (so-called) or WoD, depending on the store's customers, and make sure they buy up whatever gets ordered big that month.

Bear in mind that I have seen such stores, even ones which boast of being the top store in their states, go under, much to the customers' consternation. Wasn't that the best store, with the best guy? What happened?

Hello,

No one at this site has ever claimed that selling independent RPGs is going to save game stores.

All we can offer are the tendencies toward more sustainable sales over the long run, per core book, and more fun per unit of use. They may not make much money for the retailer, but it'll typically be reliable money.

To some retailers, these features are attractive enough to include our games as part of their business model in a more proactive way, rather than being slush orders. These retailers are welcome to carry the games, and avenues exist for them to pursue - better avenues than just "deal with us one by one," too.

To others, they don't mean anything, and therefore those retailers should not order our games. That's been my line all along.

Best,
Ron

Lloyd,

So you seem to be going down a path I've seen before: Gaming stores only carry RPGs in general out of some misbegotten love. Because true business sense would force them to carry profit-making items like card and miniature games.

In the apparent financial wasteland that is RPG sales: Sorcerer may sell one or two copies a month, but that's often more than most other "big name" lines. Not WotC, but some of the Green Ronin, Mongoose, Eden, Palladium, SJE, etc. How many copies of Stargate do you think still sell? Sorcerer's margin may be lower per book than those lines, but it's going to sell more copies over time. And it's likely that a product with is evocative and challenging is going to bring a customer back to the store for more of the same. So that stocking similar items and being reasonably informed about them, is a profitable venture. Whereas an overpriced book-of-the-line more often leaves the sour taste when it doth suck.

On a related note, have you run a retail store? If so for how long? Where? What was your prime mover?

-Luke

abzu wrote:
Lloyd,
So you seem to be going down a path I've seen before: Gaming stores only carry RPGs in general out of some misbegotten love. Because true business sense would force them to carry profit-making items like card and miniature games.

In the apparent financial wasteland that is RPG sales: Sorcerer may sell one or two copies a month, but that's often more than most other "big name" lines. ....So that stocking similar items and being reasonably informed about them, is a profitable venture.

Whereas an overpriced book-of-the-line more often leaves the sour taste when it doth suck.

On a related note, have you run a retail store? If so for how long? Where? What was your prime mover?