The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Dying in Dogs
Started by: museleading
Started on: 10/6/2006
Board: lumpley games


On 10/6/2006 at 10:18pm, museleading wrote:
Dying in Dogs

I'm reading the chapter on Resolution in Action (pg 89-90 in the new version) and I was hoping someone could explain something to me.

For instance, I have a possessed person hit you in the head with an axe, what's at stake is does he murder you.  I put forward a fat Raise and you don't have the dice to Seeā€¦ so you have to Give.  You're dying of an axe in the head. Ouch. Your companion rushes to your side.  So now we roll forward into this conflict where what's at stake is: are you dead? I roll 4d8 + Demonic Influence, just as thought you'd taken 4d8 Fallout.

What I don't understand is the stakes.  In the first conflict, the stakes were 'does he murder you'.  The player Gave, so why is there a second conflict with the same stakes?  Shouldn't the character be murdered now?

Message 21749#222687

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by museleading
...in which museleading participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/6/2006




On 10/7/2006 at 2:24pm, lumpley wrote:
Re: Dying in Dogs

That's just how it is. You can pretend that the stakes of the first conflict were "does he leave you for dead," if that helps. That's what they really are, mechanically, whenever a PC's life is at stake.

Notice that this is NOT automatically the case for NPCs.

We've discussed this at some length here; anybody care to link to a good thread or three?

-Vincent

Message 21749#222728

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/7/2006




On 10/7/2006 at 8:11pm, museleading wrote:
RE: Re: Dying in Dogs

It's cool, I've hunted around and found a bunch of things on dying, IIEE & stakes/goals.  The only issue I had was the way it worked in the rulebook and what was discussed here seemed different.

Message 21749#222756

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by museleading
...in which museleading participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/7/2006




On 10/11/2006 at 2:51pm, nikola wrote:
RE: Re: Dying in Dogs

Where's the 4d8 come from? The player gave, so they didn't take any fallout.

Message 21749#223016

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by nikola
...in which nikola participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/11/2006




On 10/11/2006 at 8:08pm, museleading wrote:
RE: Re: Dying in Dogs

It's not fallout dice.

There is a special resolution for when the stakes involve PCs dying. 

I think what Vincent is trying to say is that when a PC is dying from fallout, a second conflict is raised with the GM rolling all the PC's fallout dice & Demonic Influence.

That isn't the case with the axe example.  The possibilty of the PC dying is part of the stakes.  They resolve as "Yes, the NPC is trying to kill you".  A second conflict is launched around the actual dying part in a similar way that dying from fallout launches a second conflict.

The GM rolls Demonic Influence and 4dsomething. If the previous conflict left the PC dying through being:

pushed or fallen - 4d6
hit with a weapon - 4d8
shot - 4d10

The book example is an axe (weapon), so the example calls for 4d8.  The 4d8 (when dying is the stakes) is used in place  of fallout dice (when dying as a consequence from fallout).

Hope I've cleared this one up.

Message 21749#223029

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by museleading
...in which museleading participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 10/11/2006