The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Characters: simply cyphers for Players?
Started by: TomTitTot
Started on: 7/17/2007
Board: lumpley games


On 7/17/2007 at 5:45am, TomTitTot wrote:
Characters: simply cyphers for Players?

I have a quick but important question for you old hands here at DitV.

I am concerned that Dogs is designed to evoke and elicit judgements from players via characters however: are the characters merely window-dressing for the player's judgements, or do the characters make the decisions and the players only direct those characters.

This concerns me, because I believe many RPG player use their characters to shield themselves from making hard decisions by allowing their characters to adhere to a black and white or easily thrown away moral framework, and I wouldn't like that to happen in my game. Not that it's a problem for my players that I forsee, but one of my players very much uses her characters as a mask for her own beliefs and moral judgements in other games, and the other is very interested in making realistic characters that have their own points of view.

Anyway, late and must sleep now. Thanks, guys.

Sorry if this isn't clear. Tired.

Message 24322#237257

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by TomTitTot
...in which TomTitTot participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 7/17/2007




On 7/17/2007 at 6:12am, Eliarhiman6 wrote:
Re: Characters: simply cyphers for Players?

Hi!

In my opinion, the character can't make any REAL decision. It's always the player that make decision, about what the character will do in the fiction.

The really important thing is that the player CARE. He has to care about what happen to the people the character meet. Without this, if he don't care, the game can't work right.

If the player care, he can show this playing his character in a very immersive way,or not. It doesn't matter. He will have to do hard decisions anyway.

Another important thing is that the player should not be forced to play "only with the knowledge of his character". This is explained very well in the game manual, and it's not a minor matter.  (Using theory jargon, there should be some Author Stance)

Message 24322#237258

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Eliarhiman6
...in which Eliarhiman6 participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 7/17/2007




On 7/17/2007 at 4:04pm, lumpley wrote:
RE: Re: Characters: simply cyphers for Players?

When I play, often my character does things that I find appalling, according to her own strict internal integrity. Sometimes she does things I surprise myself by approving of.

Violating the character's internal integrity is poison to the game. But, at the same time, and as importantly, the game is set up on purpose to confront your character with the consequences of her choices. If she changes her mind about something, based on experience, that'll be according to, not in violation of, her internal integrity.

Hm...

If you're worried about your players not getting honestly into the game, hell, maybe it's not the game for them. That stuff in chapter 1 about how you need to get your players' buy-in, I really mean that.

-Vincent

Message 24322#237291

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 7/17/2007




On 7/17/2007 at 9:56pm, TomTitTot wrote:
RE: Re: Characters: simply cyphers for Players?

Well, one of my players has very much bought in. The other, I think, may have a bit of trouble.

I suppose we'll see. Game is tonight, and I'm excited to finally be running it.

Message 24322#237307

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by TomTitTot
...in which TomTitTot participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 7/17/2007