The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: [Poison'd] Questions
Started by: Nyarly
Started on: 8/23/2007
Board: lumpley games


On 8/23/2007 at 6:35pm, Nyarly wrote:
[Poison'd] Questions

Do I cipher properly that, having completed a pursuit & evasion fight, there's a gap in which the PCs can attempt success checks, with the obvious available fight the next stage of ship battle?  And that the GM gets new profile-based Xs as the ship combat enters the new range?

Are the Xs next to injuries suffered at the hand of Captain Jack the same or different from Xs received as the result of success checks?  If injuries are suffered at the hands of the new captain, are they marked or not?  If an ambition is achieved, is it's X like an X from success checks?

If I have the time to back up my inclination to put together a character sheet, should I keep it to myself or would you like to see it?

Message 24629#239375

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nyarly
...in which Nyarly participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/23/2007




On 8/23/2007 at 6:50pm, Nyarly wrote:
Re: [Poison'd] Questions

And one I neglected:

Are none, any or all of the lists in the game not intended to be exhaustive?  I'd read sins, and injuries as exhaustive, ambitions likely so, bargains exhaustive only at character creation, and means of escalation not at all.  Close?

Message 24629#239378

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nyarly
...in which Nyarly participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/23/2007




On 8/23/2007 at 11:28pm, lumpley wrote:
RE: Re: [Poison'd] Questions

1. You cipher properly.

2. The Xs next to injuries suffered at the hand of Captain Jack are just to mark them, for the benefit of the GM, for purposes of knowing who Captain Jack was. In demo and play I say stars instead; they're a whole different thing than the Xs.

3. I'd love to see it.

4. Very close. In fact, right on.

-Vincent

Message 24629#239419

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/23/2007




On 8/23/2007 at 11:50pm, Nyarly wrote:
RE: Re: [Poison'd] Questions

That first one makes a huge difference.  There rest are good to know.  Thanks!

Message 24629#239421

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nyarly
...in which Nyarly participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/23/2007




On 8/24/2007 at 12:32am, Piers Brown wrote:
RE: Re: [Poison'd] Questions

One more:

The sample characters seem to be built with Soul = 7 - Devil.  Is this just an earlier iteration of the rules, instead o the currentf 8 - Devil? 

Message 24629#239427

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Piers Brown
...in which Piers Brown participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/24/2007




On 8/24/2007 at 12:31pm, lumpley wrote:
RE: Re: [Poison'd] Questions

Exactly! I shorted all the example characters 1 Soul, by an accident of incomplete revision.

-Vincent

Message 24629#239447

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by lumpley
...in which lumpley participated
...in lumpley games
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/24/2007