The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: [carry] New Print Run Coming Up
Started by: Nathan P.
Started on: 3/31/2008
Board: ndp design


On 3/31/2008 at 2:27am, Nathan P. wrote:
[carry] New Print Run Coming Up

It's getting to be time for another print run of carry. While I'll be combing the text back and forth looking for typos and small things to correct, I can always use more eyes! If anyone happens to have notice a typo or mystifying piece of text in the book, please let me know. I can't offer much, except my gratitude and a shout-out on the back page, but I would really appreciate it!

Just so y'all know, I'm not rewriting any of the game per se - this isn't for a new edition, or anything (though I've been doing some soulsearching about that). It's just "this is misspelled" or "this wording doesn't parse" or "this reference is wrong" kind of stuff.

Thanks!

Message 26001#249846

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nathan P.
...in which Nathan P. participated
...in ndp design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 3/31/2008




On 3/31/2008 at 3:57am, Eliarhiman6 wrote:
Re: [carry] New Print Run Coming Up

Nathan wrote:
It's getting to be time for another print run of carry. While I'll be combing the text back and forth looking for typos and small things to correct, I can always use more eyes! If anyone happens to have notice a typo or mystifying piece of text in the book, please let me know. I can't offer much, except my gratitude and a shout-out on the back page, but I would really appreciate it!


I listed some confusing (or needing an errata) text in this thread, in the middle of other questions


Just so y'all know, I'm not rewriting any of the game per se - this isn't for a new edition, or anything (though I've been doing some soulsearching about that). It's just "this is misspelled" or "this wording doesn't parse" or "this reference is wrong" kind of stuff.


This include changing some of the examples, or they stay the same too? They were the thing that got most criticism in the first edition...

Forge Reference Links:
Topic 23593
Topic 23387

Message 26001#249850

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Eliarhiman6
...in which Eliarhiman6 participated
...in ndp design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 3/31/2008




On 4/1/2008 at 10:12pm, Nathan P. wrote:
RE: Re: [carry] New Print Run Coming Up

Thanks for the reminder and the suggestion, Moreno. Revisiting the example text is certainly something I should, and will, do.

Message 26001#249900

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nathan P.
...in which Nathan P. participated
...in ndp design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/1/2008




On 4/21/2008 at 12:56pm, Mel_White wrote:
RE: Re: [carry] New Print Run Coming Up

That's great news! 

Message 26001#250624

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Mel_White
...in which Mel_White participated
...in ndp design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/21/2008




On 4/22/2008 at 12:01am, Nathan P. wrote:
RE: Re: [carry] New Print Run Coming Up

Revisions are done, and I'm now awaiting the proof. Thanks for the feedback, Moreno!

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to revise the examples in a manner that satisfied me with the time I had to devote to the revisions. Fortunately, there are a number of fairly straighforward errata-things that I changed, mainly to smooth off some cruft that I don't think ever got used in actual play. I'll be posting a document with the changes for those who already own the game when I get some more free time, hopefully soon.

Message 26001#250651

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Nathan P.
...in which Nathan P. participated
...in ndp design
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/22/2008