The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Playtest of Tim Denee's Final Stand
Started by: Kenway
Started on: 8/2/2002
Board: Actual Play


On 8/2/2002 at 3:45pm, Kenway wrote:
Playtest of Tim Denee's Final Stand

[continued from indie rpgs forum]
Energy vs Actions Points: My friend and I concentrated on Action Points, thinking initiative was important to victory. The way we played, starting first allowed someone to dictate the flow of the fight.
We might have placed too much emphasis on blocking and trying to get a sizeable dice advantage over your opponent.
Consequently, Energy didn't seem that important to us.

Short Round Lengths: Most of the time was spent planning your next move! Mechanically, the game moves very quickly. There really are lots of options available and you have to plan several moves ahead.

[to be continued]

Message 2935#28445

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Kenway
...in which Kenway participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/2/2002




On 8/3/2002 at 3:18am, Tim Denee wrote:
RE: Playtest of Tim Denee's Final Stand

Excellent, excellent.

I might change it so that it's random who gets initiative, just to even up the usefulness of energy and action. I'll see how actual play goes.

Thanks.

Message 2935#28526

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Tim Denee
...in which Tim Denee participated
...in Actual Play
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/3/2002