The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?
Started by: Gunnox
Started on: 9/3/2010
Board: Publishing


On 9/3/2010 at 7:25pm, Gunnox wrote:
Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

Hi i'm new here to the forge and are currently working on my tabletop RPG called DrakeStrike which can be found on drakestrike.webs.com. Anyway do you think I can use this mechanic legal:
That all attribute points before 5 is a 1- modifier, 5 is neutral and all points after 5 is 1+ modifier

Why I ask is because this mechanic is somewhat like the Dungeons and Dragons stat mechanic and I really find this mechanic interesting so I want to use it.
What do you think/know?

Message 30275#279262

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Gunnox
...in which Gunnox participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/3/2010




On 9/3/2010 at 8:11pm, VAgentZero wrote:
Re: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

Howdy!  Glad you came to join us.

Incidentally, standard practice is that we like to work with real names; Ron's mentioned it's hard to have meaningful conversations with handles.  If you could provide a first name in your display name, signature, or profile, that'd be much appreciated.

wrt your question:  I don't think there's a question of legality here at all.  It's a little silly to trademark/patent/whatever the rights to having increasing/decreasing stats modify die rolls, otherwise a lot of systems would fall apart at the seams.  Unless you're using copyrighted content (which you aren't), it's nothing to worry about.  I've seen a hundred systems use 3d6 stats and d20 rolls per the style of Dungeons & Dragons, and no one's had a bad word to say.  d20 is open license these days anyway, so even if someone had a problem, there's no legal ramifications regardless.

I'd love to see you talk about what's so fascinating about this mechanic and how it interplays with your system, but that probably belongs in First Thoughts.

Message 30275#279284

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by VAgentZero
...in which VAgentZero participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/3/2010




On 9/3/2010 at 8:17pm, Gunnox wrote:
RE: Re: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

Ok, thank you for the information!

Message 30275#279286

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Gunnox
...in which Gunnox participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/3/2010




On 9/4/2010 at 9:21pm, Gunnox wrote:
RE: Re: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

I also have another question, if d20 is a open license then does it mean that i can use the creature and class names used in the SRD of D&D 3.5 edition?

Message 30275#279320

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Gunnox
...in which Gunnox participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/4/2010




On 9/4/2010 at 10:56pm, Chris_Chinn wrote:
RE: Re: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

Hi Gustov,

You'll have to look at the specifics of the OGL license, but I believe so.  Thing is, most of the unique monsters (Beholders, Mindflayers, etc.) are not included for open use- general monsters like orcs, werewolves, ogres, etc. generally are.

On top of that, the OGL license does require that a percentage of any game you produce ALSO becomes Open License.  While that's not a huge deal in and of itself, it does mean that if you are marrying those parts of the game towards working with OGL- any future printings, revised editions, etc. will need you to fulfill the OGL requirements.

My recommendation is:
1) design your game to do what you want before anything else.
2) After you have a functioning game, decide if you really want to deal with OGL etc.  Generally, unless you're making your game to work with types of D&D, it's not going to help as much as be an annoyance at this time.

Chris

Message 30275#279323

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Chris_Chinn
...in which Chris_Chinn participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/4/2010




On 9/4/2010 at 11:19pm, Gunnox wrote:
RE: Re: Do you think I can use this mechanic legal?

Thank you for the information! BTW my name is Gustav not Gustov :D

Message 30275#279324

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Gunnox
...in which Gunnox participated
...in Publishing
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 9/4/2010