The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Chatroom
Started by: Jared A. Sorensen
Started on: 4/28/2001
Board: Site Discussion


On 4/28/2001 at 5:02am, Jared A. Sorensen wrote:
Chatroom

A built-in java chat client and private chatroom would be keen.

Message 35#152

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jared A. Sorensen
...in which Jared A. Sorensen participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/28/2001




On 4/29/2001 at 3:14am, ephealy wrote:
RE: Chatroom

RPGC has a great system... you can see who is where, even in their many chat rooms. Nice feature.

Message 35#161

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ephealy
...in which ephealy participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/29/2001




On 4/30/2001 at 4:09pm, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
RE: Chatroom


On 2001-04-28 23:14, ephealy wrote:
RPGC has a great system... you can see who is where, even in their many chat rooms. Nice feature.


And I highly suggest that anyone interested in a chatroom go there.

Message 35#191

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/30/2001




On 4/30/2001 at 8:41pm, ephealy wrote:
RE: Chatroom

heh - guess IRC is a bit beyond our means at this time :wink:

Message 35#206

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ephealy
...in which ephealy participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/30/2001




On 4/30/2001 at 8:49pm, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
RE: Chatroom

Actually, chatroom implementation is rather easy and well within my coding abilities.

However, a chatroom is a bad idea as it is (a) a frivolous bell-and-whistle that adds further complexity to the website (I believe in function over form) and (b) takes discussion away from a single-avenue approach to a dual-route approach that dilutes the community we have.

Message 35#210

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/30/2001




On 4/30/2001 at 10:53pm, ephealy wrote:
RE: Chatroom

Clinton is right, I think. While IRC is a nice gadget, it doesn't add to the 'permanent' discussion, and so would likely take away from the site.

What I was referring to above, for anyone who cares, is the fact that to have our own IRC server, The Forge would likely have to spend money. That may not be true - I'm not 100% sure of it... However, rest assured that if we decide to add IRC to The Forge, Clinton is more than capable of coding it up !


Message 35#221

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by ephealy
...in which ephealy participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/30/2001