The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...
Started by: Jabberwocky
Started on: 12/11/2002
Board: The Riddle of Steel


On 12/11/2002 at 1:43pm, Jabberwocky wrote:
Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

As is, the rules just say 'split the CP between the opponents'. How exactly does this work... does it mean that if you are the aggressor you may take two attacks, or may you defend against one, even though you are the aggressor. Also, what happens if the two opponents aren't performing the same type of action - if one is attacking and the othe ris defending, what is the victim doing?

Message 4543#45104

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jabberwocky
...in which Jabberwocky participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/11/2002




On 12/11/2002 at 1:49pm, prophet118 wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

well ive always been under the impression that you can do as many things as you have dice for, and as long as you retain the initiative... but i could be wrong

Message 4543#45106

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by prophet118
...in which prophet118 participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/11/2002




On 12/11/2002 at 6:05pm, Lyrax wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

It works just like against one opponent, only there's two.

If you decide to attack, you can attack both opponents at once, but you can only attack.

If you decide to defend, then you may only defend, and you will probably have to take two seperate attacks at once.

Message 4543#45128

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Lyrax
...in which Lyrax participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/11/2002




On 12/11/2002 at 11:11pm, Jake Norwood wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

I basically just divide the pool into 2 parts and run it as if two combats were happening at once. That fits with Talhoffer's descriptions of two-on-one pretty well.

Jake

Message 4543#45161

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Jake Norwood
...in which Jake Norwood participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/11/2002




On 12/15/2002 at 8:32am, Shadeling wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

prophet118 wrote: well ive always been under the impression that you can do as many things as you have dice for, and as long as you retain the initiative... but i could be wrong


You can't do as many things as you have dice for...2 exchanges is maximum amount per combat round.

Message 4543#45569

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Shadeling
...in which Shadeling participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/15/2002




On 12/15/2002 at 11:35am, prophet118 wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

cool... wheres it at?...ive been trying to get into the combat system lately, and make sure im not missing anything..lol

Message 4543#45576

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by prophet118
...in which prophet118 participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/15/2002




On 12/19/2002 at 4:10am, Warboss Grock wrote:
RE: Clarification of combat with multiple opponants...

My thought on this, is simple.
1: full attack on A
2: Karma dodge B

Message 4543#46028

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Warboss Grock
...in which Warboss Grock participated
...in The Riddle of Steel
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 12/19/2002