The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: A non-Edwards review! of Inspectres! Check it.
Started by: Clinton R. Nixon
Started on: 8/17/2001
Board: Review Discussion


On 8/17/2001 at 1:57am, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
A non-Edwards review! of Inspectres! Check it.

Yup, I reviewed something.

I recently played Inspectres at GenCon, and it rocked my world. So I got the first non-Ron review here. Go read and weep that Jared Sorensen's not running Inspectres for you. :smile:

Message 499#4283

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Review Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/17/2001




On 8/17/2001 at 6:18am, Ron Edwards wrote:
RE: A non-Edwards review! of Inspectres! Check it.

I should like to point out that Clinton and I have a shared view of what a Forge review is all about. The standards for reviews here are NOT public at this time. When they become public, then submissions will be taken.

Please don't mistake Clinton's review as open season for popping up reviews. The Forge review policy is NOT the same as RPG.net's.

Best,
Ron

Message 499#4295

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Review Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/17/2001




On 8/17/2001 at 3:26pm, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
RE: A non-Edwards review! of Inspectres! Check it.

What Ron said is true. I was pretty delirious from writing when I made that post, and it may have come off wrong.

Anyway: we will be posting a review policy soon, and then will take submissions. It's not going to be a free-for-all, and I can promise you you'll never see a review on the Forge from someone who hasn't played the game.

Message 499#4312

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Review Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 8/17/2001