The Forge Reference Project

 

Topic: SJG and independence (reply to Jason Kottler)
Started by: Ron Edwards
Started on: 4/2/2003
Board: Site Discussion


On 4/2/2003 at 11:53pm, Ron Edwards wrote:
SJG and independence (reply to Jason Kottler)

Hello,

In the thread Applying modifiers, Jason Kottler asked this question, which belongs in this forum.

Completely off topic: If the definition of indie around here is "Creator Owned", does GURPS qualify as an indie RPG?


The quick answer is, "It did." The issue here is "creator." I think that SJG as a company produces, essentially, a line of encyclopedias which are researched and written by freelancers. I think the activity passed over a crucial line, long ago, from Steve's game, Steve's company, into Steve's company, production of books by other people. GURPS as an isolated rulebook no longer exists as a game, in my view - the line is definedby its role as a series of references. I think saying "GURPS is independent" would wrongly mean saying that Steve Jackson is the personal creator of the whole works.

The somewhat more nuanced answer concerns just what extent freelancers can be employed for a game to "stop" being independent. Greg Stafford uses freelance work extensively in the Hero Wars/Quest line, for instance. That's a bit of a judgment call, but GURPS, most especially due to its primary reference role rather than its role as a played-game, is long past the gray area for this issue, to my thinking.

Please note that no judgment accompanies this viewpoint. Nowhere is it written that "It's good to be independent" or "bad not to be independent."

Best,
Ron

Forge Reference Links:
Topic 58985

Message 5822#59003

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Ron Edwards
...in which Ron Edwards participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/2/2003




On 4/3/2003 at 12:17am, Matt Wilson wrote:
RE: SJG and independence (reply to Jason Kottler)

GURPS as an isolated rulebook no longer exists as a game, in my view - the line is definedby its role as a series of references.


The existence of products like Transhuman Space, which includes a custom-fitted version of the rules, would back up your view pretty well, I'd say.

Message 5822#59006

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Matt Wilson
...in which Matt Wilson participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2003




On 4/3/2003 at 9:58pm, Gordon C. Landis wrote:
RE: SJG and independence (reply to Jason Kottler)

Not that it really matters, but I'm curious - anyone know enough about how Talislanta works in publishing terms to know if it qualifies as "indie"? I know SMS retains a lot of editorial power, but he does let a lot of other folks do the writting . . .

Gordon

Message 5822#59333

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Gordon C. Landis
...in which Gordon C. Landis participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2003




On 4/3/2003 at 10:36pm, Clinton R. Nixon wrote:
RE: SJG and independence (reply to Jason Kottler)

Gordon,

Talislanta, as of its last publishing, is independent. SMS split the writing with John Harper of Shooting Iron Games, who publishes the game. As I understand it, Shooting Iron (which is two guys, basically) makes most of the publishing decisions, but also owns the game, with SMS as a silent partner.

I'll see if I can get John to come on here and comment.

Message 5822#59356

Previous & subsequent topics...
...started by Clinton R. Nixon
...in which Clinton R. Nixon participated
...in Site Discussion
...including keyword:

 (leave blank for none)
...from around 4/3/2003