Hello,

We are almost done with JAGS Have-Not--however our tests of several vehicular damage systems have been sub-optimal--so I'm posting here to see if anyone has some input on our ideas.

NOTE: this is a rules-heavy, simmy-style system (for want of a better way to inform people) system. I'm looking for responses in that vein.

Here are the basic outlines (this is not what I'm looking to discuss--if you think you've got a better idea, cool--PM me--but I'm interested in the damage effects area, predominantly for this thread):

Vehicles take damage which is absorbed by armor (100pts of damage vs. 50pts of armor yields 50 to the vehicle).

Determining what the effects of that damage is then gets complex.

1. Structural effects
A vehicle makes a Structure roll that can result in one of six results:
No Failure: Vehicle is unimpaired
Minor Failure: Vehicle becomes a bit more vulnerable to future failure
Major 1: vehicle is sort of "dazed" for a turn.
Major 2: Vehicle is likely to crash/wreck
Major 3: Vehicle is out of commission
Critical: Vehicle is destroyed

2. Specific Damage Effects (where the issues exist)
The Basic Damage Effects are not very colorful nor distingushed by weapon type--and they do a poor job of telling you what happened to the crew and such (things we want to at leas optionally present).

So we go to theory.

1. Vehicles have Movement Kills (vehicle stops), fire-power kills (weapons), crew kills (yeah), and catastrophic kills (ammo explodes).

2. When a shell penetrates a vehicle there is an effect called Spall (high velocity gas or shards in the interrior compartments).

3. There is a segment of damage assessment called BAE(Behind Armor Effects) which simply assesses what sorts of things different weapons might do to targets (an explosion outside the vehicle is very different than one inside it--and HEAP shells are different from solid fin-stabalized rounds ... etc.)

SO--it *MIGHT* look something like this (this is not necessiarily how the system will finally wind up looking):

Major Failure 1 BAE EFFECT (Possible Movement Kill)
DAM/10 against Movement
DAM/20 against crew
Lose no weapon

Now, here's what we're looking at:

Damage Resolution
1. Determine Points of Vehicular Damage (damage done minus armor)
2. Check Vehicular damage table for Basic Damage Roll resulting in 1 of 6 above failures.

THEN

A. We could have a different BAE table for each weapon and failure type (Roll on the Major 3 HEAP table). That's, you know, a lot of critical-hitty-goodness but I think people would gag on the volume of tables involved. High degree of variance and color in the hits, low useability

B. A single BAE table that's somehow modified by weapon type (HEAP adds +12, bullets add +0?)--if there was an elegant solution here that might really be cool--but I haven't seen one.

C. Forget about weapon type, just give a little variance to each failure's type of failure (so that example above would be 1 of 3 MAJOR FAILURE-1 effects--one crew, one movement, one firepower). This is simpler--but won't distinguish against a hit from a plasma gun and a machine gun (something I'd kinda like to see).

Effects that we are considering:
1. Loss of weapon (owning character chooses)
2. Loss of "best weapon" (GM chooses)
3. Control Systems damaged (steering, maybe, or tires)
4. Major Control system damage (tires out)
5. Minor Crew Damage
6. Major Crew Damage
7. Internal fire
8. Loss of speed/range (vehicle will need repairs--but not right now)
9. Loss of brakes
10. Loss of power
11. Fuel or ammo explosion

Any feedback is welcome
The book (non-release) is available here:
http://jagsgame.dyndns.org/jags/content/JAGSVehicles.pdf

-Marco
[If you have feedback on the book, I'd like to hear it too--the version that's up has some stuff in it that we're renaming or taking out so keep that in mind. ]

Marco wrote: Vehicles take damage which is absorbed by armor (100pts of damage vs. 50pts of armor yields 50 to the vehicle).

SO--it *MIGHT* look something like this (this is not necessiarily how the system will finally wind up looking):

Major Failure 1 BAE EFFECT (Possible Movement Kill)
DAM/10 against Movement
DAM/20 against crew
Lose no weapon

Effects that we are considering:
1. Loss of weapon (owning character chooses)
2. Loss of "best weapon" (GM chooses)
3. Control Systems damaged (steering, maybe, or tires)
...

Hi Mike,

Very well thought out answer. Thanks.

1. We do have a penetration system of sorts there--basically if "penetration happens" then the damage done is likely to go way up.

2. I think you're on target with the three basic types of damage--that's certainly what I was looking at. I hadn't thought about vacuum damage--and I doubt we'll get that complete but it's a good call. Internal Explosion, External Explosion, and Impact are a good trio.

The crew damage effect is interesting as well. I've fired rockets in training--but never at a live vehicle or even a moving one.

3. I figured we'd back-track to figure out what was hit. The vehicle is hit and you lost a weapon? It was a weapon/turret hit.

That list was sort of a sample as I was envisioning
Roll 1-2 3-4 5-6
Major Failure 1: EFFECTS A EFFECTS B EFFECTS C

And that'd be in the (say) 1-2 column (CREW)

I realize it's hard to get everything in text on the post--I appreciate your feedback and questions.

-Marco

Marco wrote: 1. We do have a penetration system of sorts there--basically if "penetration happens" then the damage done is likely to go way up.

The crew damage effect is interesting as well. I've fired rockets in training--but never at a live vehicle or even a moving one.

3. I figured we'd back-track to figure out what was hit. The vehicle is hit and you lost a weapon? It was a weapon/turret hit.

That list was sort of a sample as I was envisioning
Roll 1-2 3-4 5-6
Major Failure 1: EFFECTS A EFFECTS B EFFECTS C

And that'd be in the (say) 1-2 column (CREW)

Hi Marco,

I've been toying around with vehicular damage systems for years. Never came up with anything satisfying, but I am still trying.

In an indirect answer to your post, I'm going to bring up two other VD systems and their merits and flaws:

Warhammer 40k has a very similar damage system to what you described in your initial post. Armor, Armor Penetration, Component damage (weapon crippling, motive power, crew kills) though it seems a bit more simplified than what you are after.

In my experience I have found that the 40k model plays very quickly (roll to hit, roll to penetrate (based on weapon vs armor), roll for system damage/result). However, I personally find the system very unsatisfying. Random damage tables lead to too much nonsense and game-breaking in my opinion.

Steve Jackson's CarWars has the ultimate in vehicular damage systems. It's incredibly gritty (at least on the receiving damage end, weapons are pretty simple d6 damage rolls),
Armor works in two ways: ablative and "metal". Ablative just absorbs damage points, and can be chipped away. Whereas "metal" armor stops X damage from harming the vehicle. If damage exceeds X the remainder passes through to the interior and the metal armor is reduced by one point.

Functional and satisfying, but requires an entire miniatures system to back it up!

Perhaps you can come up with a better solution.


My advice would be to pick a type of vehicular combat you are shooting for and do some research into actual events. Try to look at them and reverse engineer--how can I sink a battleship in my game? Trying to do it all in one fell swoop is biting off more than anyone can chew!

small chunks,
-Luke

How much detail do you have on each vehicle?

Does each vehicle type have its own sheet, or do you make the varience between them small enough to list a vehicle just by attributes?

Some thoughts:

I had a similar problem at one time, and I ended up creating a separate sheet for each vehicle. These were mechs, and since other games with mechs often had an entire sheet dedicated to the mech, I didn't think twice about doing it in my game.

I don't know if you use hit locations, but that may help you in your damage determination. A hit to tracks, tires, impulse projectors, or anti-grav generators should produce a movement loss or decrease movement. A hit to the cab/crew quarters to kill or damage the crew. Etc.

Maybe allow characters with specific targeting skills, or using specific targeting technology, to move the random hit location up or down a specified number of hit locations. Maybe give characters who take a round to aim in the opportunity to pick the location hit.

If you put the damage results table for the vehicle on the vehicle sheet itself, you're free to alter the rolls on the table to increase or decrease the results based on what should logically occur. Everything on the sheet is then specific to the vehicle.

As to variance by weapon type, you could list it on the weapon's description and state how that particular weapon applies to a specific type of armor. Then on the vehicles sheet you could list the possible hit locations (being as detailed or as general as you want) and the type of armor at each location. This way you could have reactive armor on the crew quarters, ablative armor on the front and rear, and solid armor around the wheel wells. A hit to the crew quarters by a warhead designed to penetrate standard steel would be absorbed, vs. a warhead designed to penetrate reactive armor which would kill them. Then on the weapons instructions you can increase the cost and limit the range of weapons that penetrate reactive armor, making them harder to come by and lowering their range.

Of course, this depends on the tech in your game. Maybe you've got small high energy warheads with long range that can penetrate reactive armor easily. In this case I would make them expensive and hard to get.

You might also want to consider the geometry of the vehicle design in regards to deflection. The warhead can be defelcted if it hits at a bad angle. Give the shooter a chance roll based on their skill level to hit a target at a good angle. Either this, or have an attribute called deflection angle, and determine it from the attribute.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on detail. Making it fast, well that's something again. Once your players get the hang of it though, and if they like it, then you've got a game.

The intent in the JAGS-V design was to model the "after-market" modification phenomena. That is, you take a stock car (fairly simple list of stats) and then start adding on modifications (which includes armor and weapons).

We're looking at PC's having probably 1 or 2 vehicles for a group (either a group mini-bus or a character-specific battle car/bike) and we want a lot of distinguishing characteristics--so there's a good deal of data (each vehicle gets its own sheet).

Car Wars is, indeed, fairly detailed (I like all interior components having their own damage points)--but it really does require maps and counters to run (facing is determined by "look at the map"). I'd like the JAGS combat system to be map friendly but not require it--so that calls for some abstractions--which I think we have pretty well.

Finally: I've played Warhammer and while I agree that their vehicle system didn't *thrill* me, it didn't ruin the game for me either. Still, I'm less concerned about "random" results than an always winning strategy (shooting for the tires in Car Wars)

We have done some checking around (talked to some armor guys too) and I think we have a system that will serve us well. Thanks.

-Marco