My players seem to have really gotten into Object demons. I have at least two so far.

One is a pair of glasses that allow it's master to see into the emotional state of a person via the Hint ability. It has a Need to witness pain and suffering.

The other is a class ring that uses the Hint ability to gather information about an individual and then shapeshifts into an appropriately influential ring. "Oh, I see you graduated from Harvard what a coincidence." "Wow, I was class of '63 too." "Is that a topaz on your ring? I didn't know you were a scorpio!" It's Need is for religious debate.

I think both of these demons are pretty neat but the thought of ROLEPLAYING them is pretty daunting. With no telepathy in Sorcerer how does an Object demon communicate with it's master? How does an Object demon 'behave.'

So the first thing I came up with allowed me to turn what I perceived as a weakness into a strength. How does the demon get the master to fullfill its need? Then I realized, well, it will just stop working. And how scary is that? So, the ring starts being mean and shapeshifting into the LEAST influencing thing it can come up with. The glasses don't show its master anything. Obviously the demon wants something. But what? You can't ask it. Scary stuff.

The other complication can be the junkie escalating adiction phenomenon. One day just seeing the pain of marital problems isn't enough for those glasses. So their master has to start talking to rape victims and soon that isn't enough. So their master has to go seek out POW torture survivors. And eventually the MEMORIES of pain and suffering aren't enough and the master has to provide more immediate forms. And so on.

The last thing I thought of was the fact that object demons can move but just in a behind your back kind of way. I see the master of the glasses pined down to a bed by some sexy femme fatal figure and suddenly wanting insight into this woman's motives. He reaches over to the bedside table where he put his demon down and, "Oh god, where'd it go?" And then over her shoulder he spots the glasses on the dresser all the way across the room!

These are pretty good ideas but they will get old. And since I have more than ONE object demon, I don't want to use these tricks for BOTH of them. How do you make object demons distinct in personality? How do you roleplay and object demon?

Jesse

Jesse,

"These are pretty good ideas but they will get old."

No they won't. You just named three great approaches. Pick one for each demon. Even if you use the same two, one might be playful and the other might be malevolent, in terms of their specific moments of rebellion.

Also, take a look at the sanzoku material in Chapter 7 of the rulebook, and consider how totally screwed those sorcerers are, in exactly the terms you've described.

I love Object Demons. "Oh cool, a magic item," players say. I just smile.

Best,
Ron

Hi Jesse,
I'm having the exact same issue right now. A player has a locket that confers all sorts of powers. Its need is to be "baptized," or returned to some sort of natural water (river, lake, spring). Its desire is for justice in a very eye-for-an-eye kind of way (is this a valid desire?).
The need I can handle. The desire, on the other hand... I mean, it's a complicated idea in the first place, and I'm worried that what I might see as an act of injustice the player might see totally differently. And since the demon can't talk, we might end up with some major confusion.
But I like your three suggestions, I think I'll have to apply one of them.
Anyway, I'd be curious to see how you resolve this, or how it turns out in play. Contact me by private email if you want.
-Tor
ps Is this for your Pi inspired game?

Hello Tor,

No, these object demons are not for my Pi inspired game. That idea fell flat. Instead we went with a sort of Urban Professionalism premise. The glasses belong to a psychologist and the ring belongs to a politition. I think we're lookng at a your job vs. empathy thing.

These characters have been built in advance for me to think about. We're currently playing another game and we won't get to the Sorcerer game for a while. So unfortunately I can't give you any sort of in game examples.

However, I did want to comment about the Desire and Need thing. For a while I really couldn't figure out how Desire was suposed to be used since Need is the only thing that really matters at the end of the day. I mentioned this problem to my girlfriend and she offered a REALLY good explination that I now use. You can think of the Desire as the MOTIVATION for the Need.

For example I can tell you that the ring demon Needs religious debate. But WHY? If it's Desire is Knowledge than it only wants to learn things. It genuinely cares about the academic exercise of debate. It's not trying to kill you. However if its Desire is of Mayhem then it's not really into the academic exercise. It's into the Crusades. Its into the bloody aftermath of dogmatic differences. It WANTS things to get emotional and heated and for two people of differing faiths to kill each other.

You see? Same need, different desire, different demons.

Using that thinking I have slight issues with the locket demon. First of all I find the need to be baptised a bit tame. The justice desire is interesting in sort of a good ideals with an extremist approach to it. Where I start to have problems is that the Desire, doesn't really explain the Need. Granted it doesn't have to, but man does that make life so much easier when you think of it that way.

Oh and as far as having different views on justice. Don't sweat it. Just because the demon thinks one thing is justice and the player/character thinks another thing is justice doesn't make it a bad thing. That makes it a plot point. So the player does what he/she thinks is just and it doesn't line up with the demon. The demon just stops working. Why? Who knows? Can't ask it. Go with the flow and watch the confused character wreck all kind of havoc trying to figure out what the demon wants.

This is why I have issues with the Desire not being linked to the Need. So the player doesn't deliver Justice. So what? The player doesn't have to. The player has to dip the locket in water. As long as that's okay, the Desire is just there and doesn't have any punch or impact.

Hope this helps.

Jesse

I love Object Demons. "Oh cool, a magic item," players say. I just smile.

Hi there,

ONE
Linking the Desire and the Need is a matter of GM and group taste. I personally like them to be pretty different, just in general, but I don't mind if they're not. I can see why Jesse is more comfortable having a clear link between them, and I agree that combos can lead to a very nice diversity of meaningful demon types. A little part of me likes some puzzlement in the universe regarding demons, though, so therefore I will also make demons whose Desire/Need combo simply doesn't have an easy explanation.

TWO
I'm afraid that you guys might be missing the role-playing element of the Desire, which is that the demon does want it, and it will take steps and act upon it as much as possible. Unlike a Need, a Desire is never satisfied. Unlike a Need, a Desire may be fulfilled in a wide variety of ways (they're abstract). And LIKE a Need, an unfulfilled Desire makes a cranky and rebellious demon.

No, the sorcerer does not HAVE to fulfil the Desire. But an unfulfilled Desire still makes a cranky and rebellious demon ...

THREE
As for the acquisition or fulfillment of the Desire, this issue is kind of tricky. It breaks up into demons that can move about and do stuff on their own (passers, most obviously) and those that can't (objects, most obviously).

Both kinds depend on the sorcerer to get their Need. That's given. However, the more autonomous sorts ALSO do stuff on their own without being told, or comment on things, or negotiate about stuff, and generally be ... well, more autonomous. The Desire gives the GM a basis to play those actions.

The less autonomous sorts are harder on the sorcerer, because not only does he or she have to supply the Need (which is known), but the demon ALSO gets cranky without the Desire as well (which is not known).

Best,
Ron

P.S. Oh! Just thought of this, too. I can see that in-game sorcerers would have a term for the demon's Need, in their particular school or style of sorcery. But the Desire is strictly a metagame term. Sorcerers do not KNOW about the Desire; it's basically a way to describe the demon's personality.

[ This Message was edited by: Ron Edwards on 2001-11-08 18:10 ]

Well, I didn't get much of an opportunity to role-play the locket during our game: i pretty much ran demons hassle free this first session (with a couple of notable exceptions).

However, for the future I'm nervous enough that the demon's desire is so complex that it will be impossible to have the player figure out what it wants. It's occurred to me for the player to communicate every once in awhile via dreams with the locket: not really a two-way communication, but since they have link it seems like the locket might reasonably influence the emotional content of dreams from time to time.

Also, the player asked me a couple of tough questions during the game that i really couldn't answer off the top of my head. How do I tell when my demon is happy? (he asks in character) How do I know what it wants? What does it need?

Anyway, hopefully i'll be prepared for this saturday.
tor

Hi Tor,

"... I'm nervous enough that the demon's desire is so complex that it will be impossible to have the player figure out what it wants."

I don't see any particular reason that a player should ever figure out his or her demon's Desire. As I wrote earlier, the Desire is there as an aid to the GM in role-playing the demon.

If the demon can't communicate at all, the player will simply have to pay attention to when it is reluctant to be useful and when it is eager to be useful, independently of Need.

If the player and GM are not up to this level of subtle, reactive role-playing, then much of the point of playing an Object demon has been lost.

Fortunately, since Need is the real priority, and all that the sorcerer is FORMALLY responsible for, that ought to be enough to maintain a decent working relationship.

"It's occurred to me for the player to communicate every once in awhile via dreams with the locket: not really a two-way communication, but since they have link it seems like the locket might reasonably influence the emotional content of dreams from time to time."

That's a viable solution if the the above suggestion is not likely to work. I regard it as a bit of a cop-out (dreams and visions are very common means for simply instructing players what to do, or what clue to look for), but it is familiar and potentially effective. You might want to compare films that use dream sequences, to nail down the difference between a bogus pseudo-plot device and a genuinely interesting turn of events.

"Also, the player asked me a couple of tough questions during the game that i really couldn't answer off the top of my head. How do I tell when my demon is happy? (he asks in character) How do I know what it wants? What does it need?"

This is an Object, right? It can't tell you anything. It sits there.

Oh, all right. I pull various stunts to make Object demons a bit less opaque. It comes more or less easily to the character's hand. It suddenly weighs a ton and snaps its chain or refuses to be picked up (use Stamina vs. Stamina for the roll). Stuff like that.

[Of course, laptops or watches with LED displays or stuff like that can always "talk" to you, although I play them as notably alien.]

One more thing: if you talking about how the character knows the demon's formal Need, recall that there is a Binding scene in the character's history. Ask the player what that might have been like, as Binding by definition makes the sorcerer responsible for meeting the demon's Need.

If the player stares at you like a deer in the headlights, then consider actually PLAYING this scene, as a flashback or otherwise-surreal element of a session.

Best,
Ron

Hello Tor,

I have to go with Ron on this one. Since the whole point to the Sorcerer design philosophy is to aid in generating stories that are about the player's character and not the GM's scenario of the week then all the "problems" you're seeing with object demons aren't problems at all. They're story meat.

Take a look at my psychologist with the glasses that give him insight into a targets emotions. Those glasses have a need to see pain and suffering. His kicker involves a couple who he witnessed having a sexual experience over a car wreck and have now shown up as patients of his. Now, look up a few posts and see my suggestion about an object demon being a drug junkie.

This guy has signed on for one roller coaster of a story. I don't NEED a backstory to make this guy's life interesting. As the couple draws the well meaning psychologist into their seductive and destructive web the glasses get hooked. It wants MORE, it wants MORE. The psychologist starts turning to the glasses for help but the glasses start abandoning him because it's need has grown so large. So, the poor psychologist is left alone with a needy demon and a pair of psychopaths. Does he reject the demon and try to help the couple on their own or does he join the couple on a destructive rampage in an effort to feed the demon?

Obviously this is speculation and I'll have to see what the player actually does before putting any of this into practice but the possibilities are already presenting themselves. If someone takes an Object Demon they're signing up for some pretty heavy confusion. My demon just stopped working, why? Just shrug and smile malevolently.

Jesse

Hey,

Ah geez! I totally forgot. It's a LOCKET, right? That means it opens and closes.

Cool - talk about an opportunity to do some surrealistic demon interaction. He opens the locket ... and "X" happens. He opens the locket again ... and "Y" happens. Keep it weird, use it for some information transfer if you really want to, and have the demon go into savage Need each time it's done.

Is there a picture in the locket (ie a cameo)? Or what?

Best,
Ron

On 2001-11-15 12:50, Ron Edwards wrote:

Is there a picture in the locket (ie a cameo)? Or what?

Best,
Ron

A bit of bloody cloth? What's it from? If it's from the binding ceremony then perhaps it bleeds more when the demon is in distress. I can see a cool scene where the demon wants something so bad that the blood actually oozes out of the locket and drips downthe character's shirt.

Or if the blood is from a sacrifice or something, maybe it gets depleted when the demon is hungry. Lots of possibilities.

But I think that Ron's implication of a picture (the usual contents of a locket) would be really cool. The picture could change indicating the mood of the demon. Very Night Gallery.

Mike

On 2001-11-16 12:11, Mike Holmes wrote:
A bit of bloody cloth? What's it from? If it's from the binding ceremony then perhaps it bleeds more when the demon is in distress. I can see a cool scene where the demon wants something so bad that the blood actually oozes out of the locket and drips downthe character's shirt.

Or if the blood is from a sacrifice or something, maybe it gets depleted when the demon is hungry. Lots of possibilities.

BTW, what was the demon's telltale?

On 2001-11-16 12:50, Mike Holmes wrote:
BTW, what was the demon's telltale?

Hello,

Well, we finished our game yesterday and I thought I'd comment on the "locket" object demon. I have to admit, I was pretty much stumped by it. Remember, its desire was for "justice" in an Old Testament, eye for an eye kind of way. And I never once brought this into play because I just couldn't isolate incidents of "oh, this wrong was done, and it hasn't been punished."

A thought I had before this last session was to force the issue. (you know, something really obviously wrong and unjust like a random guy beating his wife) Then if the character doesn't take action at that moment to inflict justice, have the locket quit working until he somehow rights the wrong. Maybe it wouldn't even have to be the same abusive husband, maybe it would be enough to beat the crud out of anybody who's hit a woman... you know, something like that.

But the other problem I had with role-playing the locket was a bit more complex. Morality was far too ambiguous and complex in the game to make easy value judgements. I mean, people were doing all sorts of horrible things all over the place, but for the most part they were doing them because the people had had horrible things done to them in the past. In the end it turned out that the "villain" who was trying to murder his own grand daughter was acting under the control of one of the most sympathetic character in the game. Or another example of the black groundskeeper beating up his boss who had been mistreating him for years. Who's right? Who's wrong? These kinds of questions paralyzed me, and kind of highlight the trope of introducing "just plain bad" characters into the game (the wifebeater, for instance). It's too easy, too convenient, and tends to hide so much moral ambiguity.

Sigh. I'm sure there was some way around this conundrum, I just couldn't come up with it.

-Tor

Hi Tor,

I think the answer is simply to look over the character as played and enjoyed during the game, and to say, "Did the way we used the locket detract from what we created?"

If the answer is no, then you're cool. All is well. That means you can consider the questions you've raised in this thread as a creative challenge for the next Sorcerer game, perhaps in a context better suited to deal with them, and not worry so much about what you did or didn't "do right" in this one.

From what you've written about the Southern-Fried game, that seems to be the case.

Best,
Ron

Hi Ron,

You're right, it's really a question of what to do in the future. The locket as played certainly didn't detract from the game.

Tor

Tor,

It occurs to me that if the locket had an Old Testament sense of justice, why not have given it an Old Testament sort of morality...

Ten Commandments, Judaic patriarchal, strict, authoritarian, old-world conservative sense of what is right and wrong.

At the VERY least, this will introduce a very intense conflict into the game between the sorcerer and the locket -- as the sorcerer is undoubtedly going to have a more modern, open view of morality (one where women aren't property and slavery isn't acceptable, frex).

In addition to Ron's point about ignoring the locket not being a problem and being addressable later, might I add that it might have been a sort of positive thing to leave it out?

While the locket is certinaly a source of potential plot and interest, there is a danger in any scenario or storyline of introducing too many elements. I think that this is particularly true in a RPG where you are going to be telling the story of so many important characters already. In Southern-Fried you mentioned that there were a large number of interesting plot threads that never got resolved. Did you really need another? Probably not. Sounds like the game was full up with stuff as it was. If anything, stuff like the locket is good to keep in reserve and unaddressed until such time as you find that you are short on material.

In fact, if you do continue with these characters into a new storyline, I think that you'll find that your preparation task will be to add only a couple of new elements (the locket for example), and mostly to decide what to de-emphasize to ensure that you can get through a reasonable proportion of the threads. Especially if your players all come up with new kickers.

Mike

Good points, Mike. It's nice to play in a game where you have so many interesting elements that you have to start picking what you leave out. Unfortunately, this is it for this group (wahhhh) as I am about to graduate from college and move far away in approx., [checks watch] 24 hours.

Also, good idea to Raven. If I'd spent some more time thinking about the locket I probably would have incorporated something like this. I'm still not sure how I would have communicated it, though. Hm.
Tor