Hi there, I've been assigned in my psych class at college, along with four other people, to develop a game illustrating some aspect of psychology. Naturally, I fell back on my RPG design materials.

However, the game has to be demonstrated in front of the class in under twenty minutes. I thought of creating a one-scene rpg featuring players as the "voices" of a guy with schizophrenia (ripped off, from, of course, "Everybody is John.") But still, is such a thing as a 20-min. RPG possible? And if so, how?

--Pal

Yes.

If you have a definite time limit, include time limits in the mechanics. And if you want to engage the audience, incorporate them into the mechanics as well.

Combine that with each participant as a separate personality. Voila!

Or did I just describe improv theater?

Zak Arntson wrote: Or did I just describe improv theater?

My usual demo for Pax Draconis starts off "You're a security guard working for the local bank. It's about three in the afternoon and you think you might die of boredom when three guys walk in wearing trench coats. They'd seem suspicious to you on any day, but the weather is pretty warm for trench coats. What do you do?" It's a very simple conflict (stopping bank robbers) that nonetheless gives some opportunity to role-play, and I can teach the basic rules and run through this demo in less than ten minutes.

The key is to provide a clear incentive for action, with a situation that makes the objectives fairly clear. In general, if you can fully describe the plot and setting in less than three sentences, you're good to go. It also helps if the NPCs are in a position to advance the plot even if the PCs try to stall.

Seems like this thread is coming at things from the wrong end. The time limit is not the important thing here, it's the aspect of psychology that's important! You have to support that, then figure out how the time limit fits into the whole thing. So, what aspect of psychology are you using? Do you get to choose, or is it assigned?

quozl wrote:

Zak Arntson wrote: Or did I just describe improv theater?

Is there a difference?

It might be a little heavy, but Ethan Greer's An RPG of Clinical Depression might be worth a look.

Also, Jason L. Blair's The Insects of God might help out.

I think the key here is to put all the extra time into prep work.

Create a very simple scenario, including the characters and whatnot. Create single-page sheets for everyone, which includes quickie intros to basic concepts. "Describe what you're doing. The Moderator will tell you what happens."

Mention the dice mechanics if you're using any. Just present it as a clear, simple instruction set, with an "ask the Moderator" (which is you, of course) thing in case people get confused.

Be sure to establish social contract ground rules in the instructions, like "raise your hand when you want to do something, the Moderator will call on you" kinda things.

Paganini wrote: Seems like this thread is coming at things from the wrong end. The time limit is not the important thing here, it's the aspect of psychology that's important! You have to support that, then figure out how the time limit fits into the whole thing. So, what aspect of psychology are you using? Do you get to choose, or is it assigned?

I'd go for pre-generated characters, too, if you're trying to save time (if that's even applicable).

/me is thinking of Mike Holmes' Cell Gamma. Dunno if you could actually get in a full game in 20 minutes, but boy, it's certainly psycho enough. :)

Well, I didn't expect such a wealth of responses. If I did, I might have pushed the RPG angle more in my meeting with the rest of the group for the project.

As it stands, we're going with a different game, but this thread has been enlightening, especially from the new gamer point of view.

Thanks.