Topic: New TROS review at RPG.NET
Started by: Morfedel
Started on: 2/23/2004
Board: The Riddle of Steel
On 2/23/2004 at 4:36pm, Morfedel wrote:
New TROS review at RPG.NET
just an FYI. Seems like a reasonable review, all told.
http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10119.phtml
On 2/23/2004 at 5:35pm, Malechi wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
Once again SAs are locked away in the basement of a review.
Having said that, I do think the reviewer calls it as he sees it and his comments don't seem too far off-base. Given I care less about art now than I did 10 years ago, I mean, I don't get to play with the art do I?
Jase
On 2/23/2004 at 8:18pm, Wolfen wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
A little harsh on the art (I think the TRoS art is pretty damned good, with some glaring exceptions) but overall a very good and very solid review. His phrasing was a bit less than respectful at a few points, but the points made were mostly spot on.
On 2/23/2004 at 11:45pm, arxhon wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
Yeah, for someone who is so concerned about art, he sure got the cover wrong.
Not that i'm questioning the rest of the review; it's pretty good and fairly solid.
And again, SA's get short shrift.
On 2/24/2004 at 3:59am, Caz wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
It's the first TROS review I've mostly agreed with. It'd make me buy it if I already hadn't.
On 2/24/2004 at 6:40pm, Jake Norwood wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
Overall a very, very fair review. The controversial ones sell more, though...
Ha.
Yeah, well done.
Jake
On 2/25/2004 at 3:10am, Deacon Blues wrote:
RE: New TROS review at RPG.NET
I make it a point never to respond to either critics or fans (a good piece of advice given to me years ago). What's printed is what's printed. So don't take it personally if I leave your points unanswered or don't respond to your thanks.
However, I will say I'm glad to know you guys are keeping an eye out. :)