|
Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: Ron Edwards on May 24, 2002, 11:05:00 AM Hi everyone,
One thing that I'm enjoying a lot right now are all the great reports from Sorcerer GMs that are cropping up. So I did a little thread-combing, and I'm hoping that this this page (http://www.sorcerer-rpg.com/brochure.php/actualplay.html) proves useful to people who come to the site. Any comments? Suggestions? Best, Ron Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: Christopher Kubasik on May 24, 2002, 12:21:35 PM Here's my comment:
Oh, thank god. Could we see more of this on the vast variety of well-mined and fascinating Forge topics. Take care, Christopher Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: Valamir on May 24, 2002, 12:29:17 PM I think its a great asset.
Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: xiombarg on May 24, 2002, 12:45:44 PM Quote from: Christopher Kubasik Could we see more of this on the vast variety of well-mined and fascinating Forge topics. Perhaps I should take this to the "Site Discussion" forum, but I agree with this. A "hit list" of often-referenced threads would be a really nice addition to the Forge resources. Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: Clay on May 24, 2002, 12:57:13 PM I like this idea for a completely different reason. It's demonstrating that The Forge is a useful resource for the game, and taking advantage of the ability to interlink sites. In a sense, it makes both sites more useful.
Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: joshua neff on May 24, 2002, 01:12:36 PM That. Fucking. Rocks.
That's really great. I think it'll be a tremendous asset to potential Sorcerer players. Title: Actual Play page at the Sorcerer site Post by: Ron Edwards on May 24, 2002, 01:21:57 PM Thanks, everyone. It stays. I might toss a mention of the page onto some other pages at the site, notably FAQ, Rules Questions, and maybe even the retailer/promo page.
As for taking the same general approach to the Forge as a whole, see my new thread at Site Discussion. Best, Ron |