The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
August 13, 2022, 10:57:01 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
64
- most online ever:
565
(October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
The Forge Archives
General Forge Forums
Site Discussion
Communication Ethics of the Forge
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Communication Ethics of the Forge (Read 2946 times)
Bill_White
Member
Posts: 202
Communication Ethics of the Forge
«
on:
May 06, 2004, 07:43:33 AM »
The threads about Forge hubris and thread locking prompt me to observe that one way of thinking about "how we do things around here" is that it's driven by a kind of "ethics" of communication: a value judgment about how to approach our interactions with others.
In other words, the commitment of the Forge to hashing out ideas in a civil but intellectually rigorous way is an implicit commitment to an idea of what communication is for that's along the lines of what my favorite social theorist, Jurgen Habermas, calls "dialogic ethics": an orientation toward (1) achieving understanding rather than "winning the debate" and (2) creating a dialogue among people rather than performing monologues in front of each other.
As soon as we notice this, though, we come face to face with the fundamental problems that crop up in dialogic ethics; specifically (1) the problem of enmity ("Why should I talk to someone who hates me?"), (2) the problem of ignorance ("Why should I listen to someone who doesn't know what he's talking about?") and (3) the problem of power ("Can I really engage in 'dialogue' with someone who can shut down the conversation whenever he wants?")
It's possible to view the routines that the Forge has built up as ways of grappling with each of those problems while maintaining its "dialogic" commitment. For example: the insistence upon civility (defusing enmity); the gentle remonstrances afforded "newbie posts" (remedying ignorance); the careful delineation between the "two hats" (moderator and participant) that Ron and Clinton wear (masking or maybe disciplining power).
Notice that all of these solutions are built, as has been suggested in other threads, on trust. But not just "Trust Ron" (not to abuse his "power" as moderator, which interestingly and I think somewhat paradoxically derives from his authority as participant
primus inter pares
). No. What's interesting to me is the way that the Forge's commitment to dialogic ethics requires us all to trust each other. It's really quite extraordinary.
All of which is a long way to go to get to: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. But the solutions break down as soon as the trust does, which is important to realize, in my view.
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
Posts: 16490
Communication Ethics of the Forge
«
Reply #1 on:
May 06, 2004, 07:55:02 AM »
Hi Bill,
I agree in full. And boy, do I have thread references for you ...
The Forge as a community
and
The five percent
, both of which are part of the Infamous Five family of threads (see the sticky thread at the top of Site Discussion for a full list of the Infamous Five links; I highly recommend them as the turning-point of the Forge from a small group of knowledgeable insiders to a real community).
Hello! And welcome to the Forge
, which had a big influence on the etiquette stickies at the top of the forum now.
New days upon us
,
Real names at the Forge
, and
Editing posts
, all of which offer bits and snippets of discussions and explanations about Forge etiquette.
Best,
Ron
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum