Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Started by Vaxalon, December 05, 2005, 06:06:31 PM
Quote from: Vaxalon on December 06, 2005, 07:14:51 AMthe "social agenda and and anti-social agenda" material I am presenting here is not an attempt to supplant, remove, or add to the "creative agenda" theory. They really aren't creative agendas.
Quote from: Vaxalon on December 06, 2005, 08:47:52 AMWhat I'm talking about is competent leadership. The best gamemasters, in my opinion, are the best leaders. Creativity can be bought (such as running an adventure module) but the ability to communicate, persuade, and unify or divide a group of people is not.
Quote from: Ron Edwards on December 06, 2005, 09:03:00 AMNeal, the player/GM distinction is not relevant. As far as I can tell based on what you're saying, your behavior is uncooperative and pushy when you're not a GM. I see that as a basic Social Contract issue that you bring to the table - "I have to be GM." I was very similar about twenty years ago. This has nothing to do with Creative Agenda, which you seem to be mis-reading as a personal typology, and/or as supposed to explain any and every dysfunction during play.
Quote from: Ron Edwards on December 06, 2005, 12:11:02 AMHello,I'm with Jim on this one. Looking for some kind of real Creative Agenda to describe or justify this guy's actions is a lost cause.Best,Ron