*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 08, 2022, 01:55:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4285 Members Latest Member: - Jason DAngelo Most online today: 83 - most online ever: 565 (October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Where should people refine their understanding of the Big Model?  (Read 2922 times)
David Hallett
Member

Posts: 23


« on: February 28, 2006, 04:01:50 AM »

If I have a question about my understanding of the Big Model, what should I do?

My guess is: come up with an example of Actual Play that illustrates my fuzziness, and post it in that forum.

Is that right? Or are enquiries of that sort simply no longer welcome here?

If so, I'll take it somewhere else. But this does seem to be the largest concentration of expertise in that area.
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2006, 05:16:53 AM »

Hello,

You're right on the money with the guess about Actual Play.

The current goal is for people to use Actual Play to address practically any question or concern about role-playing, with the Big Model as one of any number of possible topics.

As I see it, the ideas will be refined more effectively and efficiently in that venue.

Best,
Ron
Logged
David Hallett
Member

Posts: 23


« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2006, 06:22:17 AM »

Thanks Ron, I'll do that.

Best,

Dave
Logged
Clyde L. Rhoer
Member

Posts: 391


« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2006, 07:17:53 AM »

Hi Ron,

I'm not trying to be difficult, but...what do you do if you can't think of an actual play example that will help demonstrate what part of the Big Model you don't understand?
Logged

Theory from the Closet , A Netcast/Podcast about RPG theory and design.
clyde.ws, Clyde's personal blog.
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2006, 10:44:21 AM »

Hi Clyde,

That's a pretty hard situation to imagine. If you're absolutely, absolutely sure you've got something like that in mind, then email or PM me.

However, first, I suggest considering the value of both positive and negative examples, not in the fun/not-fun sense, but rather in the analytical. You might say, "Hey, this point in this essay just isn't working for me. I don't know what this guy is saying." Then you say, "Because when I play, it seems to go like this and that doesn't seem to match." That's a negative example and very useful for discussion - you can post about playing and how it turns out, and then how that doesn't seem to connect with the point in the essay.

Or maybe your concern with an essay or point in the essays is more vague; it just isn't gelling for you at all. That's OK too. You can post about your experiences with play that make perfect sense to you, or match well with other points I've made, and then post, "So that part makes sense, but this part here in the essay doesn't work like that for me, for some reason," and we can discuss from there.

Having any kind of well-described actual-play touchpoint for discussion makes Big Model talk possible in the first place. Even if you emailed or PMed me, you can bet I'd start simply by asking about your experiences in play anyway.

Best,
Ron

edited to fix stupid name-mistake
« Last Edit: February 28, 2006, 10:47:40 AM by Ron Edwards » Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!