The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 23, 2022, 03:54:25 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
89
- most online ever:
565
(October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
The Forge Archives
General Forge Forums
Site Discussion
Confused about where to contribute reference resources.
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Confused about where to contribute reference resources. (Read 3221 times)
Ian Mclean
Member
Posts: 29
Confused about where to contribute reference resources.
«
on:
September 22, 2007, 08:44:02 PM »
I often enough find interesting books and other resources regarding game development and design. I would like to post them for people to look at and consider; especially, since a lot of content regarding game studies is coming out of the wood works. I believe that these resources would be a boon to those of the site.
Is there a place where one would post such resource and if not, then why?
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
Posts: 16490
Re: Confused about where to contribute reference resources.
«
Reply #1 on:
September 23, 2007, 11:38:23 AM »
Hi Ian,
I'd like to see those too! Here's how to do it.
First, you do some analysis of your own: compare what a given reference is saying, in a chapter or whatever, to some actual experiences of yours during role-playing. Does it fit? Does it work? Does it seem to miss a point to you?
Second, describe the experiences of play as well so the readers can understand your perspective. This is absolutely required, because one person's immersion is another person's grandstanding, and one person's GMing is another person's railroading, and one person's realism is person's game-stopper. We'll be reading your post - but to understand it, we have to know what you mean by terms that will do nothing but rouse emotion and cause confusion otherwise.
Therefore, your forum for this purpose is Actual Play. Yes, this
is
the theory forum - when discussions of ideas are clarified by describing play, they work. Otherwise, they don't. I hope to see you there!
Best, Ron
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum