The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 19, 2022, 07:13:14 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
88
- most online ever:
565
(October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
The Forge Archives
Independent Game Forums
lumpley games
(Moderator:
lumpley
)
[Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict (Read 1949 times)
watergoesred
Member
Posts: 12
[Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
«
on:
December 16, 2008, 05:31:40 PM »
I ran a game of Poison'd with five players on Monday night. All up it went pretty well. See
here
for an account of play.
We floundered a bit, however, figuring out how conflict works.
For example, Matt's playing Jim Plate, the Dagger's carpenter. Matt says Jim Plate grabs the helpless Tom Reed off the deck and softens him up with a few kidney punches. Matt rolls for attacking the helpless and succeeds. We took that to mean Jim Plate does precisely what Matt says. Then Matt says Jim throws Tom on a capstan and ties him to it. Matt successfully rolls again for attacking the helpless. Here was the first bit of confusion.
1) Can the GM bring on the fight before Tom Reed is tied to the capstan, despite Matt not failing a success roll? Effectively, can the GM ask of the NPC "Will you fight or endure duress"? If so, this seems a little like GM overriding Matt's success rolls. If not, then it seems a player could effectively bring down NPC's without a fight, just by making a success roll or two. I realise in the rules it says there's always going to be a fight, but what if the narration of the success rolls makes that fight more and more uneven, like if Tom Reed's disarmed, stunned and tied to a capstan. Even if Jim Plate's profile isn't four or more than Tom Reed's, how's a real fight between them going to make sense?
2) Can a player narrate killing a NPC with a string of success rolls or must they always use 3 Xs to kill an NPC? If Jim Plate's tied Tom Reed to the capstan and Matt says Jim Plate cuts out Tom Reed's heart with his knife, and Matt successfully rolls attacking the helpless, has he killed Tom Reed without using Xs?
3) How encompassing can the narration of a success roll be? If Matt says he's going to grab Tom Reed, tie him to the capstan and cut out his heart, can Matt narrate all this with only one successful roll against attacking the helpless?
We also had a little trouble understanding the ship-to-ship conflict rules.
4) Is the Captain's brinkmanship used for the player's ship? The conflict rules say the players roll their brinkmanship in a fight and ships haven't brinkmanship.
O, and I found rolling an NPC's brinkmanship or under on 1d6 to determine if they escalate worked fine. Moldy Pedro was like a bull in china and wouldn't stop till someone was down, whereas the Captain of the Forthright hadn't half Pedro's bottle.
Logged
oli
Graham W
Member
Posts: 437
Re: [Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
«
Reply #1 on:
December 17, 2008, 12:25:04 AM »
These are exactly the kind of things that worry me when running Poison'd.
Firstly, winning a success roll doesn't exactly give you narration rights. It allows you to succeed, and there'll be discussion of exactly how you succeed, but you don't get free rein to narrate. If in doubt, you'd hash out the details of
how
you succeed with your group. (The rules aren't too specific on this, I think.)
1) Can the GM bring on the fight before Tom Reed is tied to the capstan, despite Matt not failing a success roll?
Yes, I think so. The GM can bring on the fight whenever there's conceivably a fight at hand. Matt started the fight by attacking Tom.
(Note, here, that Tom isn't necessarily helpless, just because Matt said so in his previous narration. Winning the success roll doesn't grant you narration rights.)
2) Can a player narrate killing a NPC with a string of success rolls or must they always use 3 Xs to kill an NPC?
So, again, winning the success roll doesn't give you the
right
to narrate anything, including killing an NPC.
We've had NPCs killed with a Brutality vs Soul roll, but I don't think it's a given.
3) How encompassing can the narration of a success roll be? If Matt says he's going to grab Tom Reed, tie him to the capstan and cut out his heart, can Matt narrate all this with only one successful roll against attacking the helpless?
That
could
all be narrated, but Matt doesn't get the
right
to narrate it himself.
4) Is the Captain's brinkmanship used for the player's ship?
Yes!
Graham
Logged
lumpley
Administrator
Member
Posts: 3453
Re: [Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
«
Reply #2 on:
December 17, 2008, 06:58:13 AM »
The PCs can kill Tom Reed without a fight, sure.
The GM narrates everything. Players say what their characters undertake to do. The GM has them roll when appropriate (which is strictly defined by the rules, not the GM's call), and then tells them what happens; if they rolled, the GM has to abide by the outcome of the roll.
The GM's allowed to say stuff like "whoa whoa whoa, you've just now laid hands on him, let's deal with cutting his heart out when we know whether you've got him tied to the capstan in the first place." The GM's also allowed to not say that, but go straight to the heart cutting. Everything the players say their characters undertake to do is fair game.
I'm liking the "roll a die under the NPC captain's brinksmanship to escalate" rule.
-Vincent
Logged
watergoesred
Member
Posts: 12
Re: [Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
«
Reply #3 on:
December 17, 2008, 03:14:32 PM »
This helps, thanks.
I didn't realise the GM controlled the narrative to such an extent. The game text didn't give me this impression. And having "to abide by the outcome of the roll" is clearly very flexible. Cool.
Logged
oli
Graham W
Member
Posts: 437
Re: [Poison'd] Success rolls and ship-to-ship conflict
«
Reply #4 on:
December 17, 2008, 05:06:40 PM »
Quote from: lumpley on December 17, 2008, 06:58:13 AM
I'm liking the "roll a die under the NPC captain's brinksmanship to escalate" rule.
Jesus, why? Why why why? You don't need this stat! Get rid of it!
Graham
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum