The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
January 27, 2023, 03:36:37 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
138
- most online ever:
660
(January 18, 2023, 03:22:41 PM)
The Forge Archives
General Forge Forums
Actual Play
Combat molasses
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Combat molasses (Read 15630 times)
Daniel B
Member
Posts: 171
Co-inventor of the Normal Engine
Re: Combat molasses
«
Reply #15 on:
March 07, 2010, 03:23:50 PM »
@ no one in particular
Come to think of it, the nature of a roleplaying game really runs counter to that essence of person-to-person combat, don't you think?
In an RPG, you must depend on the GM and other players to tell things "as they really are", and by the same token, you must trust the other players to believe you when you make statements. Without this trust, you can't really construct an SIS. "Haha players, TPK. I lied when I said there was no dragon sleeping on top of the treasure hoard."
This requirement to trust and be truthworthy hinders capturing the feeling of person-to-person combat because it disallows players from seeking and taking advantage of all the tiny little opportunities that open up. For example, you might get lucky in real, physical simulated combat by, say, ducking left to dodge the enemy's swing and then finding yourself facing his now-exposed left flank. In a game, either the player specifically requests that his PC set this up, or the GM offers "you've ducked the swing and your PC is now in a better position to hit the enemy." In either case, it must be "artificially" added to the SIS; it does not emerge "naturally".
What I'd really love to see is a system that has simple and streamlined rules, but which has lots of leeway for some serious emergent complexity.
Logged
Arthur: "It's times like these that make me wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was little."
Ford: "Why? What did she tell you?"
Arthur: "I don't know. I didn't listen."
FetusCommander
Member
Posts: 21
also Rudy
Re: Combat molasses
«
Reply #16 on:
March 08, 2010, 10:26:38 AM »
Quote from: Daniel B on March 07, 2010, 03:23:50 PM
This requirement to trust and be truthworthy hinders capturing the feeling of person-to-person combat because it disallows players from seeking and taking advantage of all the tiny little opportunities that open up. For example, you might get lucky in real, physical simulated combat by, say, ducking left to dodge the enemy's swing and then finding yourself facing his now-exposed left flank. In a game, either the player specifically requests that his PC set this up, or the GM offers "you've ducked the swing and your PC is now in a better position to hit the enemy." In either case, it must be "artificially" added to the SIS; it does not emerge "naturally".
What I'd really love to see is a system that has simple and streamlined rules, but which has lots of leeway for some serious emergent complexity.
That's a good point tbh, and I'd like a system like that too
A system where it's possible to "do something wrong" that mechanically exposes you, but where that "something" isn't tied to the book research that trick is talking about.
That said, I don't find the other two of those combat phases that uninteresting, only when they bog as someone mentioned. I think the things that frustrate me most about combat are 1) lack of real stakes in the combat (i.e. you're fighting 20 kobolds and know you'll win, but you've got to fight them), and 2) that glaze that happens when its not your turn and nothing is affecting you directly.
Time limits can actually help with both of those if done right. A GM from my group once used a system that relied on people to dictate actions within a certain time frame, then the situation was debated by the group, and ruled on. That definitely made paying attention a lot easier, and elevated the fear of "real" consequences a bit.
Overall, i think some metagame tactics discussions are important for the fun, as long as they don't become rules disputes, looking up rules, or delay the game indefinitely.
Logged
trick
Member
Posts: 18
Re: Combat molasses
«
Reply #17 on:
March 31, 2010, 11:54:49 PM »
Quote from: Daniel B on March 07, 2010, 03:23:50 PM
In an RPG, you must depend on the GM and other players to tell things "as they really are", and by the same token, you must trust the other players to believe you when you make statements. Without this trust, you can't really construct an SIS. "Haha players, TPK. I lied when I said there was no dragon sleeping on top of the treasure hoard."
I think this is a significant part of the problem. The thing is that combat "as it really is" is chaotic, and can often go easily one way or the other. Of course if the GM tries to enforce this to the PCs' detriment, their players get unhappy. I think the solution for this is to use mechanics that are inherently chaotic. One idea (inspired by Black Cadillac's Death Die) would be to get wound counters or something during a combat scene, but the actual result of wound damage be calculated after a combat scene. The result is that nobody knows how much your character is hurt till after the scene is over. Another possibility is to allow players to reroll dice a certain number of times, but for every time they do it, the GM gets a free dice to roll at his choosing. If the GM collects a big enough pill of dice, that could be really bad news.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum