*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 19, 2022, 06:41:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4285 Members Latest Member: - Jason DAngelo Most online today: 83 - most online ever: 565 (October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Buying Initiative Alternative  (Read 1563 times)
Paul Heinz
Member

Posts: 6


« on: October 23, 2002, 04:51:58 PM »

I confess I find the 'buy initiative' rules a little complex. I've been thinking about ways to streamline them whilst still keeping the tradeoff. My current take is the following:

The buyer spends dice from their CP up to the limit of their REF + WT. These dice are then rolled against a TN equal to the opponents PER. The opponent gets to roll their REF in dice against a TN equal to the buyers WP.

The buyer needs to gain more successes than the defender to pre-empt. In the event of ties, you could either rule a double-hit or assume that the buyer failed. I kind of like the double-hit possibility - it's more dramatic!

This makes pre-empting not unlike an additional contest of reflexes, but with different TN's to reflect the battle of the buyers determination (WP) vs the attackers awareness (PER). Also, the defender gets 'free' dice equal to his REF, whilst the buyer has to spend dice from his CP, so the trade-off is still preserved.

Opinions?

I've yet to load both rule models into my TROS dice roll spread-sheet to  examine the expected results for a range of REF, WP, WT and PER values to see how closely they model each other. The opposed pool vs target mechanic gives some interesting alternatives when formulating rules - I quite like the flexibility to do a little 'oppositional calculus' (as I call it :-)
Logged
Jake Norwood
Member

Posts: 2261


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2002, 08:15:13 PM »

Suggestions are always welcome. I, too, think the buying initiative rules aren't as slick as I'd like.

Jake
Logged

"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -R.E. Howard The Tower of the Elephant
___________________
www.theriddleofsteel.NET
Warboss Grock
Member

Posts: 13


« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2002, 07:58:12 AM »

Heck, i ran with a gruop that just had you add whatever dice you wanted from your combat pool to the dice from your reflex roll for inititive
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!